![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:0pfrr1hq97jhjljjbr8fmcqc1eeisp2le5 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:30:54 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:5varr1lamthi9faa1s5m4ibivejbnsm2l6 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts accordingly. Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does) Maybe for you but not for me. Looks fine. Well, I am on 1024 768 and if I open "favorites" so it reduces the size of the page, then look at the right panel (Web Developer Help section) you will see the problem. ![]() I am on a 1280 by 1024. I have actually went and made it as skinny as possible until of course the info moves to the bottom. That is what it is suppose to do if it is fluid with that much info. I never have my screen that small of a width. But to me it isn't a problem even with the small width. BTW poor Justin all I did was make a compliment. I apologize to you Justin. I really liked your design. |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 02:54:26 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:0pfrr1hq97jhjljjbr8fmcqc1eeisp2le5 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:30:54 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:5varr1lamthi9faa1s5m4ibivejbnsm2l6 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts accordingly. Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does) Maybe for you but not for me. Looks fine. Well, I am on 1024 768 and if I open "favorites" so it reduces the size of the page, then look at the right panel (Web Developer Help section) you will see the problem. ![]() I am on a 1280 by 1024. I have actually went and made it as skinny as possible until of course the info moves to the bottom. That is what it is suppose to do if it is fluid with that much info. I never have my screen that small of a width. But to me it isn't a problem even with the small width. Different strokes ![]() BTW poor Justin Porr Justin ? I am poorer than he is LOL |

|
all I did was make a compliment. So did I - and gave him some advise too about the adsense. Or would you prefer that I said nowt and then he gets banned ? I apologize to you Justin. I see no need why you need to. We both gave him compliments. |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul wrote: On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 02:54:26 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:0pfrr1hq97jhjljjbr8fmcqc1eeisp2le5 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:30:54 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:5varr1lamthi9faa1s5m4ibivejbnsm2l6 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts accordingly. Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does) Maybe for you but not for me. Looks fine. Well, I am on 1024 768 and if I open "favorites" so it reduces the size of the page, then look at the right panel (Web Developer Help section) you will see the problem. ![]() I am on a 1280 by 1024. I have actually went and made it as skinny as possible until of course the info moves to the bottom. That is what it is suppose to do if it is fluid with that much info. I never have my screen that small of a width. But to me it isn't a problem even with the small width. Different strokes ![]() BTW poor Justin Porr Justin ? I am poorer than he is LOL Can you be sure of that? ![]() |

#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:57:58 -0600, Justin Koivisto <justin (AT) koivi (DOT) com wrote: Paul wrote: On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 02:54:26 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:0pfrr1hq97jhjljjbr8fmcqc1eeisp2le5 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:30:54 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:5varr1lamthi9faa1s5m4ibivejbnsm2l6 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts accordingly. Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does) Maybe for you but not for me. Looks fine. Well, I am on 1024 768 and if I open "favorites" so it reduces the size of the page, then look at the right panel (Web Developer Help section) you will see the problem. ![]() I am on a 1280 by 1024. I have actually went and made it as skinny as possible until of course the info moves to the bottom. That is what it is suppose to do if it is fluid with that much info. I never have my screen that small of a width. But to me it isn't a problem even with the small width. Different strokes ![]() BTW poor Justin Porr Justin ? I am poorer than he is LOL Can you be sure of that? ![]() Unless you have less than £300 to your name, and can put all your belongings into 2 suitcases, then yes. ![]() |

#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
read the page on the home page. For the most part I view sites it the full view. Unless I run a side by side when viewing SERPs. From whatI noticed with my family we all go to full screen except when needingto view several things |

#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
There is a background picture (some street with bottom part of somebody walking). If you scroll the screen down in IE, what happens to the picture under the text? At least in IE 6.0 background picture splits - parts outside of the text boxes remains in its position (as it is expected to do), but part under the text boxes scrolls together with text. Just for the record, FF does it right... ![]() |


#27
| |||
| |||
|
| Porr Justin ? I am poorer than he is LOL Can you be sure of that? ![]() Unless you have less than £300 to your name, and can put all your belongings into 2 suitcases, then yes. ![]() so.. that what about US$600? ... ok I guess you do have me beat there, I have a 13 yr. old jeep that I'd need to fit my stuff into. ![]() |


#28
| |||
| |||
|
phone. ![]() |
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:h38tr1pkt76mgfefghpaqa7gmfqo84rr2g (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... snip Nor do I have a mobile phone. ![]() Not missing much. I forget to turn mine on, forget it at home, leave it on and kill the battery, etc.:-) |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:23:26 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message news:h38tr1pkt76mgfefghpaqa7gmfqo84rr2g (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... snip Nor do I have a mobile phone. ![]() Not missing much. I forget to turn mine on, forget it at home, leave it on and kill the battery, etc.:-) I can't stand the damn things. I wouldn't have one if they were free. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |