Rankings.

What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.

I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph

that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?

Cheers

James
--
James Helliwell
Firespin Design
w. www.firespin.co.uk
West Sussex Company specializing in
Web, Print Design, Illustration,
Hosting services and Support.
Affordable prices.

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
<james (AT) firespin (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.

I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph

that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?

Cheers

James

http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

David
--
Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/

David wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
james (AT) firespin (DOT) co.uk> wrote:


What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.

I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph

that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?

Cheers

James


http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

David

Yeh Cheers Dave, is that what you use?

I think tha is what I will use and am using. I think im doing ok bit
pissed at the moment I spent somem £ on wordtracker just to find out
it's US based...

James

--
James Helliwell
Firespin Design
w. www.firespin.co.uk
West Sussex Company specializing in
Web, Print Design, Illustration,
Hosting services and Support.
Affordable prices.

__/ [James Helliwell] on Sunday 11 December 2005 14:26 \__

David wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
james (AT) firespin (DOT) co.uk> wrote:


What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.

I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph

that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?

Cheers

James


http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

David

That's actually a useful tool. You mentioned it before, but I didn't both-
er to register with the site. I wonder if it's of any use for many arbi-
trary results pages. I guess it's mainly of interest to commercial sites
whose scope is narrower and visitor-to-profit ratio is quite high.

Yeh Cheers Dave, is that what you use?

I think tha is what I will use and am using. I think im doing ok bit
pissed at the moment I spent somem £ on wordtracker just to find out
it's US based...

Was that mentioned in the fine prints when you purchased a licence? If
not, perhaps you can get a refund, arguing that it must be stated to the
prospective customer. Many businesses make money out of ambiguities.

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:50pm up 23:58, 18 users, load average: 0.25, 0.37, 0.37
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

David <seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
james (AT) firespin (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.

I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph

that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?

Cheers

James

http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

Anyone interested in an offline, local version?

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
or have them custom made
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:26:28 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
<james (AT) firespin (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

David wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
james (AT) firespin (DOT) co.uk> wrote:


What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.

I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph

that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?

Cheers

James


http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

David

Yeh Cheers Dave, is that what you use?

Yep occasionally though I tend to not worry about specific SERPs, so
only track SERPs for one site of mine. I'm more concerned with
targeted traffic and money, recently lost about 10,000 visitors a day
over all sites and it hit revenue, have recovered around 5,000
visitors and earnings over all is almost normal (one source is up
considerably). The traffic I lost didn't make much money, (poetry
related, lots of it but doesn't convert well).

I think tha is what I will use and am using. I think im doing ok bit
pissed at the moment I spent somem £ on wordtracker just to find out
it's US based...

I have an annual subscription to Wordtracker and I think it's great,
OK it's US biased, but there isn't that much difference really. And
more importantly is there a better alternative?

James

David
--
Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/

__/ [John Bokma] on Sunday 11 December 2005 18:35 \__

David <seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
james (AT) firespin (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.

I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph

that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?

Cheers

James

http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

Anyone interested in an offline, local version?

It would be associated with one's own IP address, so there is a certain risk
of Google banishment, I suspect. I still use the scripts on occasions, but
the daily cron job is disabled. It makes me paranoid.

http://johnbokma.com/perl/google-position.html

[so you never needed self-promoted, did you? *smile*]

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Seeing bad movies only encourages them"
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
6:50pm up 1 day 1:58, 18 users, load average: 0.34, 0.44, 0.50
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:14:11 +0100, David
<seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

It is great but I have found it to give strange results sometimes.
For example today it shows I am 19th for one the KWs I am tracing,
while all datacenters checked at mcdar place me at 9th position.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=EBAS&...-stoichiometry
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=BATE&...ion_equilibria
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=CASC&...n_calcul ator

Borek <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:14:11 +0100, David
seodave (AT) search-engine-optimizat...es (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

It is great but I have found it to give strange results sometimes.
For example today it shows I am 19th for one the KWs I am tracing,
while all datacenters checked at mcdar place me at 9th position.

That's because they use the Google API, which is out of sync now and then
with the other datacenters.

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
or have them custom made
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:52:58 +0100, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com>
wrote:

http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/

And it's free.

It is great but I have found it to give strange results sometimes.
For example today it shows I am 19th for one the KWs I am tracing,
while all datacenters checked at mcdar place me at 9th position.

That's because they use the Google API, which is out of sync now and then
with the other datacenters.

But it should be in sync with at least ONE, shouldn't it?
And I can't find any dc showing same results

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=EBAS&...-stoichiometry
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=BATE&...ion_equilibria
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=CASC&...n_calcul ator