![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
| http://www.justhom.com |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:47:11 GMT, Adam Davies <cornhouse (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: http://www.justhom.com Eeek! CAROL!! |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:42:02 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:47:11 GMT, Adam Davies <cornhouse (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: http://www.justhom.com Eeek! CAROL!! What? Huh? *sheepish look* Sorry *quickly adopts an innocent look* I was, uhm, erm, well ... I was admiring the buns of steel pic on one page ... could flip a quarter off that guy's cheek ... Carol LOL that's mickey then, one of our models , he is a ex pro footballer |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <41e40c4a.718754 (AT) news (DOT) prodigy.net>, from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com says... On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:42:02 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:47:11 GMT, Adam Davies <cornhouse (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: http://www.justhom.com Eeek! CAROL!! What? Huh? *sheepish look* Sorry *quickly adopts an innocent look* I was, uhm, erm, well ... I was admiring the buns of steel pic on one page ... could flip a quarter off that guy's cheek ... Carol LOL that's mickey then, one of our models , he is a ex pro footballer (now a personal trainer), sorry I should of explained in my OP that it was a men's underwear site. |

#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <41e40c4a.718754 (AT) news (DOT) prodigy.net>, from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com says... On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:42:02 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:47:11 GMT, Adam Davies <cornhouse (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: http://www.justhom.com Eeek! CAROL!! What? Huh? *sheepish look* Sorry *quickly adopts an innocent look* I was, uhm, erm, well ... I was admiring the buns of steel pic on one page ... could flip a quarter off that guy's cheek ... Carol LOL that's mickey then, one of our models , he is a ex pro footballer (now a personal trainer), sorry I should of explained in my OP that it was a men's underwear site. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
You might want to explain it in your text content a little more so that way the search engines will know too. BB -- www.kruse.co.uk SEO (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk home of SEO that's shiny! -- I presume some category description would help as well, i.e writing some |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
You might want to explain it in your text content a little more so that way the search engines will know too. BB -- www.kruse.co.uk SEO (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk home of SEO that's shiny! -- I presume some category description would help as well, i.e writing some keyword dense text about thongs, or about maxi's in the maxi's and briefs section. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:13:03 GMT, Adam Davies <cornhouse (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: You might want to explain it in your text content a little more so that way the search engines will know too. BB -- www.kruse.co.uk SEO (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk home of SEO that's shiny! -- I presume some category description would help as well, i.e writing some keyword dense text about thongs, or about maxi's in the maxi's and briefs section. Absolutely. Carol volunteers. Probably. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:39:34 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk wrote: On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:13:03 GMT, Adam Davies <cornhouse (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: You might want to explain it in your text content a little more so that way the search engines will know too. BB -- www.kruse.co.uk SEO (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk home of SEO that's shiny! -- I presume some category description would help as well, i.e writing some keyword dense text about thongs, or about maxi's in the maxi's and briefs section. Absolutely. Carol volunteers. Probably. I think Adam may be looking for someone who does this on a professional level, a the subject line hints he is looking for quotes from folks, and not someone like me who does SEO and such for their own sites. But yes, Adam, keyword density will help you out on the phrases you wish to target via the search engines. You don't have to go "hard and heavy" on the density thoughts in the pages; I get by just fine with around 3% range - so you can use the 2% to 8% thought as a startign off point on that thought. Tweak the wording - and see how it goes then you can tweak it some more and gauge how that worked in your favor [or not] as you don't want to turn off the folks coming to the site also in presenting overly repetitious, boring text either but get a blend that appeals to them and to the search engines both. You can help support your on-page density by targetting 'preferred' anchor text. For example - you may not want outside links coming your way just sharing "Justhom.com" or "Just HOM" [your domain name and/or site name]. You may want some of those inbound links sharing "Just HOM fashionable mens' underwear" or some such wording that has the brand name plus some of your keywords shared in the text pointed your way. Right now anchor text is the "rage" especially in terms of Google; for how long - no one knows. If the algo changes, then you still have a link pointed your way - so that link will count one way or another. *shrug* The above is just a couple of thoughts related to handling of keywords in the text. Carol Thanks great info Carol well worth the read, My business partner is a |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |