HighDots Forums  

Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)?

Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)


Discuss Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? in the Search Engine Optimization forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old   
Roy Schestowitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-02-2008 , 09:18 AM






____/ Jez on Thursday 31 January 2008 13:50 : \____

Quote:

Andrew Heenan wrote:
"Andrew Heenan" <andrew3 (AT) heenan (DOT) net> wrote
GBB: is news.individual.net user friendly? is it a sensible layout?
10 Euros may be preferable to liberal use of the killfile!

Wow!

This is the New Me, 10 Euros lighter - once I found I could do it via
Outlook Express (Microsoft's only good program!), there was no point hanging on.

I can't be doing with the web-based setups - too slow!

Were you using a web based thing before then?

I have been using news.individual.net for nearly 3 years now and they
are well worth the money IMO - though from memory renewing was very
clunky last year.

(Microsoft's only good program!)

It's not as good as Thunderbird!

Jez.
Personally, I colour all GG posts (originating from Google that is) blue so I
can usually ignore them, especially when they are OPs. That's where the abuse
typically comes from.

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | "Computers are useless. They only solve problems"
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 25.8%us, 4.1%sy, 1.0%ni, 65.2%id, 3.4%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information


Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old   
Roy Schestowitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-02-2008 , 09:19 AM






____/ Tonnie Lubbers on Thursday 31 January 2008 16:08 : \____

Quote:
spammer schreef:
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:
Here is a thought. Since like 80% of the threads here are most clearly
SPAM, what if we did the reverse of SPAM flagging and preceded our subject
lines by something like [AISE]? Most spammers are hit-and-runners, so they
won't get the trick around it. Think of it as white flagging that helps
separate ham
from spam.

udp / filter / drop / score -9999

message-id: <containing> *googlegroups*
references: <containing> *googlegroups*


so easy, a caveman could do it.

A caveman doesn't understand that there is more ...
Yes, grey-flagging/listing is better, but it still leaves burden and clutter.

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | "Computers are useless. They only solve problems"
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 25.8%us, 4.1%sy, 1.0%ni, 65.2%id, 3.4%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information


Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old   
Roy Schestowitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-02-2008 , 09:21 AM



____/ John Bokma on Friday 01 February 2008 00:23 : \____

Quote:
"Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

thing of how this group is. Not doing anything and letting it go
without trying to at least start decent discussions will keep it so.

Spam doesn't go away if we suddenly all start to post on-topic and
informative posts. Spam goes away by reporting it. I've given up, more or
less on that. The plan for spam seems still to be to filter it out,
despite years and years of proof that filtering *does not work*
Yes, at least someone tried to eradicate the issue. Thanks, John.

Quote:
Anyway, most people here into SEO, if they had a long post on SEO, they
probably would put it on their site. I would (but damn, posting silly
posts on Usenet is so much less effort).

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: 111111 X 111111 = 12345654321
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
15:20:01 up 9 days, 1:14, 3 users, load average: 0.42, 1.00, 1.31
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project


Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old   
John Bokma
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-02-2008 , 06:40 PM



Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
____/ John Bokma on Friday 01 February 2008 00:23 : \____

"Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

thing of how this group is. Not doing anything and letting it go
without trying to at least start decent discussions will keep it so.

Spam doesn't go away if we suddenly all start to post on-topic and
informative posts. Spam goes away by reporting it. I've given up,
more or less on that. The plan for spam seems still to be to filter
it out, despite years and years of proof that filtering *does not
work*

Yes, at least someone tried to eradicate the issue. Thanks, John.
You're welcome Roy ;-) I still report spam I get via my blog, and some I
get via email Currently Geocities is abused a lot, and I report the
spamvertized URLs. After some time spammers give up, if they notice that
those sites (which redirect to the real ones), are deleted after a short
time. But still, it's a major pain in the ass to contact ISPs, and some
just say: hey, just put a CAPTCHA on your site, are you a programmer or
what!?

--
John Bokma http://johnbokma.com/


Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old   
Roy Schestowitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-06-2008 , 02:25 AM



____/ John Bokma on Sunday 03 February 2008 00:40 : \____

Quote:
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

____/ John Bokma on Friday 01 February 2008 00:23 : \____

"Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

thing of how this group is. Not doing anything and letting it go
without trying to at least start decent discussions will keep it so.

Spam doesn't go away if we suddenly all start to post on-topic and
informative posts. Spam goes away by reporting it. I've given up,
more or less on that. The plan for spam seems still to be to filter
it out, despite years and years of proof that filtering *does not
work*

Yes, at least someone tried to eradicate the issue. Thanks, John.

You're welcome Roy ;-) I still report spam I get via my blog, and some I
get via email Currently Geocities is abused a lot, and I report the
spamvertized URLs. After some time spammers give up, if they notice that
those sites (which redirect to the real ones), are deleted after a short
time. But still, it's a major pain in the ass to contact ISPs, and some
just say: hey, just put a CAPTCHA on your site, are you a programmer or
what!?
Have you gotten that linux.com problem sorted out at the end?
--
~~ Best of wishes

http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
08:20:01 up 12 days, 18:14, 4 users, load average: 0.54, 1.03, 1.31
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project


Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old   
John Bokma
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-06-2008 , 12:10 PM



Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Have you gotten that linux.com problem sorted out at the end?
Heh, yeah, when I posted a comment on a new article explaining (again) the
issue, it was fixed within a short time. Either that, or the several
emails to them finally arrived.

--
John Bokma http://johnbokma.com/


Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old   
Paul
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-06-2008 , 02:47 PM



On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:25:00 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Yes, at least someone tried to eradicate the issue. Thanks, John.
John wasn't the only one
--
"Religion is based upon blind faith supported by no evidence. Science is based upon confidence that results from evidence -
and that confidence can be modified and/or reversed by further observations and experimentation.
Science approaches truth, closer and closer, by hard dedicated work. Religion already has it all decided, and it's "in the book.
It's dogma, unchangeable, and unaffected by reality and whatever facts we come upon in the real world." -- James Randi

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old   
Roy Schestowitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-11-2008 , 09:28 AM



____/ Paul on Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:47 : \____

Quote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:25:00 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

Yes, at least someone tried to eradicate the issue. Thanks, John.

John wasn't the only one
Did he write about it here?

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | "Avoid missing ball for higher score"
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem: 515500k total, 444760k used, 70740k free, 852k buffers
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms


Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old   
Paul
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Proposal: What if We Started Flagging Non-SPAM Threads (Posts)? - 02-11-2008 , 11:36 AM



On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:28:26 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
____/ Paul on Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:47 : \____

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:25:00 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

Yes, at least someone tried to eradicate the issue. Thanks, John.

John wasn't the only one

Did he write about it here?
I was on about reporting spam, Roy

I haven't seen anything from John lately. So, I guess not.

plh
Paul

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.