PR7 Search Engine Blog Offers Link

You can have a link at my PageRank 7 Google Blogoscoped
http://blog.outer-court.com for a monthy PayPal payment. Email
philipp.lenssen (AT) gmail (DOT) com to discuss the details. Your site should
offer search engine relevant information, or at least be somewhat
"neutral." The link will be shown on my blog's front-page (right-hand
side) and on all pages throughout the site (around 20,000).

Hmmm.. lookie here. Links to PR7 Blog for a PayPal monthly payment.
It's offers like this that convinces me that Google needs to take a
hard look at what is happening out there. You have to think that the
zero relevantcy holocaust will be right around the corner once you see
links for sale on eBay.

"troar" <TheRaideronaRock (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Hmmm.. lookie here. Links to PR7 Blog for a PayPal monthly payment.
It's offers like this that convinces me that Google needs to take a
hard look at what is happening out there. You have to think that the
zero relevantcy holocaust will be right around the corner once you see
links for sale on eBay.

http://tinyurl.com/6xzgy


there's already been those looong time ago

You have to think that the
zero relevantcy holocaust will be right around the corner once you see
links for sale on eBay.

Zero relevency? I don't understand what you mean.
The links will have anchor text that relates to the target site, what more
relevency do you need than that?

regards,
mark

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:18:54 -0000, "Yonnermark"
<yonnermark (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

You have to think that the
zero relevantcy holocaust will be right around the corner once you see
links for sale on eBay.

Zero relevency? I don't understand what you mean.
The links will have anchor text that relates to the target site, what more
relevency do you need than that?

I am thinking that troar is speaking of theme relevancy - that Site A
[where the link is at] also attracts in some traffic that would be
interested in clicking on the link to Site B [the other site] due to
some "similarity" thoughts.

Like if I had my humor site link on a site selling saxophones or clock
radios; the clock radio or sax site may have a PR6 - cool for PR
thoughts, but when considering about theming playing a bit [notice I
said a bit] of a factor on Google [in terms of links/anchor text] and
click through thoughts ... then the link is just a <a href="">link to
any ol' site</a> thought.

Some folks may not care about those other two thoughts, but other
folks it may be a bit of a factor on their side on where they "pay"
for a link at as they may want more than a temporary boost to their PR
[as the little bit of PR from Site A will only flow as long as Site B
pays]. Which, thanks to at least two coop sites, why even pay for PR
thoughts anymore?

Carol

"CarolW." <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote


<snip>

Like if I had my humor site link on a site selling saxophones or clock
radios; the clock radio or sax site may have a PR6 - cool for PR
thoughts, but when considering about theming playing a bit [notice I
said a bit] of a factor on Google [in terms of links/anchor text] and
click through thoughts ... then the link is just a <a href="">link to
any ol' site</a> thought.

I think it plays a bigger factor than what some think. A few non related
links are fine but when a site goes overboard with the percentage on the non
related similar site side...then I feel it can cause more harm than good.
But, in terms of PR then yeah you can beef up PR real fast that way.

Some folks may not care about those other two thoughts, but other
folks it may be a bit of a factor on their side on where they "pay"
for a link at as they may want more than a temporary boost to their PR
[as the little bit of PR from Site A will only flow as long as Site B
pays]. Which, thanks to at least two coop sites, why even pay for PR
thoughts anymore?

Good point Carol. And how different is a coop really compared to these web
rings and such. If people don't mind adverts all over their pages then fine.
And a lot of the adverts are really non related to the sites in general so I
feel it really doesn't look very good for cosmetic reasons.

Stacey

LOL.. okay I suppose I should have checked to see if was happening
before I said that. Unreal, or more like surreal.

Stacey wrote:

"CarolW." <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:41e731fe.29829974 (AT) news (DOT) prodigy.net...

snip

Like if I had my humor site link on a site selling saxophones or
clock radios; the clock radio or sax site may have a PR6 - cool for
PR thoughts, but when considering about theming playing a bit
[notice I said a bit] of a factor on Google [in terms of
links/anchor text] and click through thoughts ... then the link is
just a <a href="">link to any ol' site</a> thought.

I think it plays a bigger factor than what some think. A few non
related links are fine but when a site goes overboard with the
percentage on the non related similar site side...then I feel it can
cause more harm than good. But, in terms of PR then yeah you can
beef up PR real fast that way.

Just speaking for my site, as it started the thread, the links to the
right side are mostly relevant, and not too many.

--
Google Blogoscoped
http://blog.outer-court.com

Philipp Lennsen wrote:

Just speaking for my site, as it started the thread, the links to the
right side are mostly relevant, and not too many.

--
Google Blogoscoped
http://blog.outer-court.com

So if a pineapple broker wants to pony up every month on pay pal for a
link to your blog, you are saying that you wouldn't take his money?

"Philipp Lenssen" <info (AT) outer-court (DOT) com> wrote

Stacey wrote:

"CarolW." <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:41e731fe.29829974 (AT) news (DOT) prodigy.net...

snip

Like if I had my humor site link on a site selling saxophones or
clock radios; the clock radio or sax site may have a PR6 - cool for
PR thoughts, but when considering about theming playing a bit
[notice I said a bit] of a factor on Google [in terms of
links/anchor text] and click through thoughts ... then the link is
just a <a href="">link to any ol' site</a> thought.

I think it plays a bigger factor than what some think. A few non
related links are fine but when a site goes overboard with the
percentage on the non related similar site side...then I feel it can
cause more harm than good. But, in terms of PR then yeah you can
beef up PR real fast that way.


Just speaking for my site, as it started the thread, the links to the
right side are mostly relevant, and not too many.

Philip,

But your site really is about a lot of different things really. What is your
main SERP and how do you rank? That is what the importance of what I am
saying about the related links.

Stacey