PR7 and 37,700 backlinks in one update

I must of been asleep - I just noticed one of my pages has a Google PR7 with
37,700 backlinks - I have only just noticed the miracle.

Take a look for yourself
http://www.ebooks-marketplace.com/adnetwork.htm

It's in your own interest to look - You can do the same and have thousands
of links to your website free

In article <qBXEd.516$EM3.17 (AT) newsfe3-win (DOT) ntli.net>, Neil Groom says...

I must of been asleep - I just noticed one of my pages has a Google PR7 with
37,700 backlinks - I have only just noticed the miracle.

Take a look for yourself
http://www.ebooks-marketplace.com/adnetwork.htm

It's in your own interest to look - You can do the same and have thousands
of links to your website free

The ad code defines a class (us82jsdd) several times in a link, causing
pages to fail W3C validation.

<a href="http://www.mob453.com" class="us82jsdd" class="us82jsdd"
class="us82jsdd" />Polyphonic Ringtones</a>

Source: http://www.searchifa.co.uk/ (or any site with the ad code, I
just picked at random)

Is there any way to avoid that?

--
Daniel Ruscoe
daniel.ruscoe (AT) gmail (DOT) com
http://www.danruscoe.com/

In article <MPG.1c4e67162e0e9bab5a (AT) news (DOT) btopenworld.com>, Daniel Ruscoe
says...

In article <qBXEd.516$EM3.17 (AT) newsfe3-win (DOT) ntli.net>, Neil Groom says...
I must of been asleep - I just noticed one of my pages has a Google PR7 with
37,700 backlinks - I have only just noticed the miracle.

Take a look for yourself
http://www.ebooks-marketplace.com/adnetwork.htm

It's in your own interest to look - You can do the same and have thousands
of links to your website free

The ad code defines a class (us82jsdd) several times in a link, causing
pages to fail W3C validation.

On closer inspection, some sites running the code don't have any classes
defined in the ad links. Are there two different versions?

--
Daniel Ruscoe
daniel.ruscoe (AT) gmail (DOT) com
http://www.danruscoe.com/

Hi Daniel, There is no way around that, but I would'nt worry about it. I
have just checked about 20 of my high ranking pages and beleive it or not -
Not one validated to the W3C validation test.

I have even checked some number one rankings in Google for highly
competitive keywords and even they don't validate. I really don't think it's
a big problem.

(that dreaded Microsoft frontpage does'nt help)

This page is number 6 at Yahoo for - learn to play guitar' and
http://validator.w3.org says;
Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on lines 261, 342, 347,
384, 474, 490, 508-509, 511-512 it contained one or more bytes that I cannot
interpret as utf-8 (in other words, the bytes found are not valid values in
the specified Character Encoding). Please check both the content of the file
and the character encoding indication.

Neil


"Daniel Ruscoe" <daniel.ruscoe (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

In article <qBXEd.516$EM3.17 (AT) newsfe3-win (DOT) ntli.net>, Neil Groom says...
I must of been asleep - I just noticed one of my pages has a Google PR7
with
37,700 backlinks - I have only just noticed the miracle.

Take a look for yourself
http://www.ebooks-marketplace.com/adnetwork.htm

It's in your own interest to look - You can do the same and have
thousands
of links to your website free

The ad code defines a class (us82jsdd) several times in a link, causing
pages to fail W3C validation.

a href="http://www.mob453.com" class="us82jsdd" class="us82jsdd"
class="us82jsdd" />Polyphonic Ringtones</a

Source: http://www.searchifa.co.uk/ (or any site with the ad code, I
just picked at random)

Is there any way to avoid that?

--
Daniel Ruscoe
daniel.ruscoe (AT) gmail (DOT) com
http://www.danruscoe.com/

On closer inspection, some sites running the code don't have any classes
defined in the ad links. Are there two different versions?

Sorry Daniel, The php code for the ads has been updated and should'nt show

classes defined in the ad links.

Neil

I must of been asleep - I just noticed one of my pages has a Google PR7
with 37,700 backlinks - I have only just noticed the miracle.

Take a look for yourself
http://www.ebooks-marketplace.com/adnetwork.htm

It's in your own interest to look - You can do the same and have thousands
of links to your website free

You're right, I love dp. But I also love www.yourcan.com we need more

Hi Gingerbreadman, You have to be carefull though of having the two network
ads on your site together.

The digital point network is closing accounts if they get found out.

I got a warning for it - Be carefull

Neil


"GingerBreadMan" <me3 (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote

I must of been asleep - I just noticed one of my pages has a Google PR7
with 37,700 backlinks - I have only just noticed the miracle.

Take a look for yourself
http://www.ebooks-marketplace.com/adnetwork.htm

It's in your own interest to look - You can do the same and have
thousands of links to your website free

You're right, I love dp. But I also love www.yourcan.com we need more

In article <XVYEd.1268$yM6.636 (AT) newsfe5-win (DOT) ntli.net>, Neil Groom says...

Hi Daniel, There is no way around that, but I would'nt worry about it. I
have just checked about 20 of my high ranking pages and beleive it or not -
Not one validated to the W3C validation test.

I have even checked some number one rankings in Google for highly
competitive keywords and even they don't validate. I really don't think it's
a big problem.

It shouldn't have any effect on your Google ranking, but I use W3C
compliance as a selling point when I'm dealing with clients and having
sites show up errors wouldn't look fantastic

I've just read your other post about the updated code. That's good news.

--
Daniel Ruscoe
daniel.ruscoe (AT) gmail (DOT) com
http://www.danruscoe.com/

37,000 links?

What is your weight at digital point?

By the way if you arent doing something like the digital point coop I
dont see how you can compete seeking out one link parter at a time.

It just isnt possible. It would take years to get enough backlinks to
get a first page ranking inhighly competitive categories.

Tim

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:53:19 +0000 (UTC), Daniel Ruscoe
<daniel.ruscoe (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

In article <XVYEd.1268$yM6.636 (AT) newsfe5-win (DOT) ntli.net>, Neil Groom says...
Hi Daniel, There is no way around that, but I would'nt worry about it. I
have just checked about 20 of my high ranking pages and beleive it or not -
Not one validated to the W3C validation test.

I have even checked some number one rankings in Google for highly
competitive keywords and even they don't validate. I really don't think it's
a big problem.

It shouldn't have any effect on your Google ranking, but I use W3C
compliance as a selling point when I'm dealing with clients and having
sites show up errors wouldn't look fantastic

Tons of third-party affiliate code doesn't validate.

BB

I've just read your other post about the updated code. That's good news.

--
www.kruse.co.uk SEO (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
home of SEO that's shiny!
--