![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 10 Sep 2006 02:00:23 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: Yup, and you're right, there are plenty of sites out there, including many wikis that supports Google's idiotic idea on how to tackle spam. The point is most people are not aware of the whole thing because it's silently added to plenty of software. MediaWiki *defaults* to nofollow, at least the install I have at home. So does WordPress, and probably plenty of other software. Clueless developers, clueless users. Easy to remove the nofollow from WordPress. |
#32
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote: On 10 Sep 2006 04:49:24 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: [..] |
|
It's over-rated and over-hyped. Ok, a personal opinion. |
|
Wiki this, wiki that. I have one on my computer. I consider it way more convenient compared to bookmarks. Now I can group bookmarks *and* add comments to them. Also the search works way better IMO. That's you. I am me. Yup, like overrated/hyped is you :-). |
|
Same way bloody blogs went. And all the offshoots. I prefer Britannica myself. You again mix up Wikipedia and wiki. It's like calling SE's shit while you mean Google :-) Only cos I am not familar with it. Just like mobile phones. Don't like them. Don't want nothing to do with them. Same here. I have one, but only because we have no landline (I in general don't like phones :-) ). I had the same with PDAs. But OTOH I know that once one starts to use something, the opinion might be changed. It's not good to call something overrated and overhyped just because you see it pop up often. I mean, people call Google overhyped and overrated. A lot who do rank poor or very poor in Google :-) |
|
[...] Yeah, said in a way. I think I reported that site 4-5 times, but still one can create blogspot blogs and use JavaScript redirect. Google could scan for such abuse with a simple piece of code. Is it happening? No. Why not, I wonder... Could Google be afraid that if it pisses of enough spammers that they will get into trouble? I am somewhat puzzled as to why they do so little over this. Fear? |
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
The problem is that I have had contact with several users who had no idea what nofollow was :-). The issue is that it's default on. When I explained it to people, they turned it off :-) |
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
Why the need for all these wiki's ? Cannot just one do ? And have it in different languages. |
|
Sorry, but it will become too much and the world will flooded with wikisomethingorother. |
|
Fear? I doubt it. Not with their money and lawyers. |
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 10 Sep 2006 16:08:09 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: The problem is that I have had contact with several users who had no idea what nofollow was :-). The issue is that it's default on. When I explained it to people, they turned it off :-) Why not make it a blog so the world will know and then you can just point your users to it. Saves explaining it time and time again. |
#36
| |||
| |||
|
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
Roy Schestowitz: I'm convinced. rel="nofollow" is, just as I expected, pure evil. I will not be using them and probably rant against them in the future. |
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote: Why the need for all these wiki's ? Cannot just one do ? And have it in different languages. Paul, you keep mixing up wiki and Wikipedia I guess. |
|
A wiki is a concept. Wikipedia uses WikiMedia (software). Anyone can use WikiMedia, and create a wiki. No need to turn it into an online encyclopedia. Esme and I use it to store notes, and our bookmarks. I don't want to store them in the Wikipedia :-) Sorry, but it will become too much and the world will flooded with wikisomethingorother. You now probably talk about people who use the content of Wikipedia on their own site, or mirror Wikipedia. Yes, that sucks often. |
|
They forget the important rule: easy content is easy for everybody. Fear? I doubt it. Not with their money and lawyers. I am afraid I am somewhat right: entire countries go easy on spammers IMO. And what's Google going to do when a spam gang outside the USA starts to take them serious? |
#39
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 10 Sep 2006 16:37:15 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote: Why the need for all these wiki's ? Cannot just one do ? And have it in different languages. Paul, you keep mixing up wiki and Wikipedia I guess. I guess. Afterall, lots of long words are abbreviated. Easy mistake to make. |
|
You now probably talk about people who use the content of Wikipedia on their own site, or mirror Wikipedia. Yes, that sucks often. Yep. Won't be long before someone starts a package where you have a blog and wiki installed on default :/ |
|
I am afraid I am somewhat right: entire countries go easy on spammers IMO. And what's Google going to do when a spam gang outside the USA starts to take them serious? Lets hope you're wrong. |
#40
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote: On 10 Sep 2006 16:37:15 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: |
|
Paul, you keep mixing up wiki and Wikipedia I guess. I guess. Afterall, lots of long words are abbreviated. Easy mistake to make. Yup very true. wiki in itself is already short for wiki wiki :-) |
|
You now probably talk about people who use the content of Wikipedia on their own site, or mirror Wikipedia. Yes, that sucks often. Yep. Won't be long before someone starts a package where you have a blog and wiki installed on default :/ LOL, with CPanel one can install a blog and a wiki AFAIK with 2 mouse clicks and entering some values. So we're already getting close. |

|
I am afraid I am somewhat right: entire countries go easy on spammers IMO. And what's Google going to do when a spam gang outside the USA starts to take them serious? Lets hope you're wrong. Aye. I saw bluefrog being ddosed of the net. And that was IIRC just one angry spammer. |

![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |