HighDots Forums  

New SEO Contest!

Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)


Discuss New SEO Contest! in the Search Engine Optimization forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
sam
 
Posts: n/a

Default New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 12:12 AM






Okay here we go:

This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com
Title: Lady Enterainers
Incoming links: 45
Internal Pages: 311
Main Keywords: phone sex

Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search.
Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its
title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the
page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is
ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I
figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added
to page 1 or some other google employee.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
teranews
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 12:31 AM







"sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Okay here we go:

This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com
Title: Lady Enterainers
Incoming links: 45
Internal Pages: 311
Main Keywords: phone sex

Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search.
Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its
title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the
page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is
ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I
figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added
to page 1 or some other google employee.
I was intrigued by this line in the source code of the index page :-

<head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11">

The page in that link has PR7, so I went to the home page and found a whole
new meta tag thing going on which I had no idea about.

Anyone here seen/used this stuff before ? Is google somehow favouring sites
with this code in order to promote it ?

(BTW Sam, the content is rubbish, but what were you doing searching for that
in he first place ?!!)

--
Rich
http://www.richdavies.com/low-carb-diet.htm


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Vance
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 03:00 AM



"teranews" <nosp (AT) mnospam (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wrote

Okay here we go:

This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com
Title: Lady Enterainers
Incoming links: 45
Internal Pages: 311
Main Keywords: phone sex

Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search.
Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its
title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the
page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is
ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I
figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added
to page 1 or some other google employee.

I was intrigued by this line in the source code of the index page :-

head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11"

The page in that link has PR7, so I went to the home page and found a
whole
new meta tag thing going on which I had no idea about.

Anyone here seen/used this stuff before ? Is google somehow favouring
sites
with this code in order to promote it ?

(BTW Sam, the content is rubbish, but what were you doing searching for
that
in he first place ?!!)

--
Rich
http://www.richdavies.com/low-carb-diet.htm


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Hi Rich

It's a Microsoft thingy!!

See: http://gmpg.org/xmdp/description &
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...51(VS.85).aspx

Not that I understand why of course.

Regards
Vance - Bristol
www.theinternetgolfclub.com





Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Tonnie Lubbers
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 03:02 AM



teranews schreef:
Quote:
"sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wrote

Okay here we go:

This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com
Title: Lady Enterainers
Incoming links: 45
Internal Pages: 311
Main Keywords: phone sex

Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search.
Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its
title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the
page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is
ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I
figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added
to page 1 or some other google employee.

I was intrigued by this line in the source code of the index page :-

head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11"

http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/...html#h-7.4.4.3




--
Webdesign: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Tonnie Lubbers
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 03:46 AM



Vance schreef:
Quote:
"teranews" <nosp (AT) mnospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:4798260a$0$30486$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com...
"sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wrote

Okay here we go:

This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com
Title: Lady Enterainers
Incoming links: 45
Internal Pages: 311
Main Keywords: phone sex

Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search.
Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its
title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the
page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is
ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I
figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added
to page 1 or some other google employee.
I was intrigued by this line in the source code of the index page :-

head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11"

The page in that link has PR7, so I went to the home page and found a
whole
new meta tag thing going on which I had no idea about.

Anyone here seen/used this stuff before ? Is google somehow favouring
sites
with this code in order to promote it ?

(BTW Sam, the content is rubbish, but what were you doing searching for
that
in he first place ?!!)

--
Rich
http://www.richdavies.com/low-carb-diet.htm


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Hi Rich

It's a Microsoft thingy!!
Yeah right, W3 has been bought by MS. Tsss....


Thats obvious.


--
Webdesign: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Andrew Heenan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 06:08 AM



"sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wittered...
Quote:
Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search.
Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its
title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the
page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is
ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I
figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added
to page 1 or some other google employee.
I guess if it rained, that would be Matt Cutts' fault too?
How sad would you have to be to search for 'phone sex' in this age of
webcams, YourFace, MyBook etc., and bars?
And how much sadder to fret about a phone sex site's search engine spam?

So, on all three counts, get a life.
--

Andrew
http://www.seo2seo.com/
http://www.sick-site-syndrome.com/
First things first - but not necessarily in that order.

The video that makes YouTube worthwhile:
Charlie The Unicorn - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Jez
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 07:53 AM





Andrew Heenan wittered...

Quote:
How sad would you have to be to search for 'phone sex' in this age of
webcams, YourFace, MyBook etc., and bars?
Which bars, specifically, Andrew? :-)

You could put up another site to explain all - sick-pervert-syndrome.com!

Jez.


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Sam
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 10:44 AM



Andrew Heenan wrote:
Quote:
I guess if it rained, that would be Matt Cutts' fault too?
How sad would you have to be to search for 'phone sex' in this age of
webcams, YourFace, MyBook etc., and bars?
And how much sadder to fret about a phone sex site's search engine spam?

So, on all three counts, get a life.
--

Andrew

I think it's sad that you would visit a bar or meet someone from online
in real life and risk getting aids or some other disease or killed by
some stranger you met from yourface or mybook rather than something like
phone sex which is totally safe sex as you can't get a disease or be
killed from having sex on the phone with someone but you can in a bar or
meeting someone from online. It's sad that so many people think the way
you do and we're constantly hearing about kids being killed on the news
who meet online preditors from websites like myspace.com and facebook
etc. I can't understand your illogical thinking.


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
ladki
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 02:51 PM



I am participating in a SEO contest at http://www.sdslabs.org/sristi08/seo-contest.php

Please take a look at my site and tell me what you think about it!

http://cheeni.mechanic.googlepages.com

Also, put a link of my website in yours !!!

Thanks for back-linking.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Phil Payne
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New SEO Contest! - 01-24-2008 , 03:41 PM



Quote:
I am participating in a SEO contest athttp://www.sdslabs.org/sristi08/seo-contest.php
One prerequisite is an ability to spell.

http://www.sdslabs.org/srishti08/seo-contest.php


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.