![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Okay here we go: This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com Title: Lady Enterainers Incoming links: 45 Internal Pages: 311 Main Keywords: phone sex Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search. Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added to page 1 or some other google employee. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wrote Okay here we go: This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com Title: Lady Enterainers Incoming links: 45 Internal Pages: 311 Main Keywords: phone sex Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search. Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added to page 1 or some other google employee. I was intrigued by this line in the source code of the index page :- head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11" The page in that link has PR7, so I went to the home page and found a whole new meta tag thing going on which I had no idea about. Anyone here seen/used this stuff before ? Is google somehow favouring sites with this code in order to promote it ? (BTW Sam, the content is rubbish, but what were you doing searching for that in he first place ?!!) -- Rich http://www.richdavies.com/low-carb-diet.htm -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Hi Rich |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wrote Okay here we go: This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com Title: Lady Enterainers Incoming links: 45 Internal Pages: 311 Main Keywords: phone sex Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search. Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added to page 1 or some other google employee. I was intrigued by this line in the source code of the index page :- head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11" |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"teranews" <nosp (AT) mnospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:4798260a$0$30486$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com... "sam" <sam (AT) as (DOT) com> wrote Okay here we go: This web site: http://ladyentertainers.com Title: Lady Enterainers Incoming links: 45 Internal Pages: 311 Main Keywords: phone sex Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search. Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added to page 1 or some other google employee. I was intrigued by this line in the source code of the index page :- head profile="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11" The page in that link has PR7, so I went to the home page and found a whole new meta tag thing going on which I had no idea about. Anyone here seen/used this stuff before ? Is google somehow favouring sites with this code in order to promote it ? (BTW Sam, the content is rubbish, but what were you doing searching for that in he first place ?!!) -- Rich http://www.richdavies.com/low-carb-diet.htm -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Hi Rich It's a Microsoft thingy!! |
|
See: http://gmpg.org/xmdp/description & http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...51(VS.85).aspx Not that I understand why of course. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Site is high up on page one of phone sex at google, yahoo, msn search. Has the poorest SEO I've ever seen, doesn't even use keywords in its title, no page header, hardly even uses keywords in the text on the page. One million dollars to anyone who can tell me why this site is ranking so high? If content is king this site is a pawn. The way I figure it this must be one of Matt Cutt's sites that he manually added to page 1 or some other google employee. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
How sad would you have to be to search for 'phone sex' in this age of webcams, YourFace, MyBook etc., and bars? |

#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
I guess if it rained, that would be Matt Cutts' fault too? How sad would you have to be to search for 'phone sex' in this age of webcams, YourFace, MyBook etc., and bars? And how much sadder to fret about a phone sex site's search engine spam? So, on all three counts, get a life. -- Andrew I think it's sad that you would visit a bar or meet someone from online |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am participating in a SEO contest athttp://www.sdslabs.org/sristi08/seo-contest.php |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |