New found links and Google

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:50:45 -0500, "--Fred--"
<canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Paul B" <webmaster (AT) firstpeople (DOT) us> wrote in message
news:iq8ms1leml0inj30hubtfg5gavb6eipls5 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On 16 Jan 2006 04:35:11 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

"--Fred--" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

very good records of my exact keyphrase searches each time. So don't
take my word for it but I would suspect that we should get some
movements within a couple of weeks.

Shouldn't there be a PR update starting soon?

Something is happening John.
Have you looked at your cached date on your homepage.
No doubt google caches yours every day too.

I have noticed this recently that it caches the page and shows it has
been cached on todays date. You check later or next day and it has
reverted back to an older date.

The sites (i've looked at) seem to be last cached on 5th jan - but
most are 30st dec - 1st jan.

May be something is going to happen. Last year we had it on jan 1st.

My sites are getting respidered every second day, yet there is no movement
in rankings in my keyphrase competitions. Nothing moves but everything get
analyzed repeatedly. My hunch is that they are testing a new ranking system
again, something revolutionary again, and are not ready to release it to the
public yet.

Which is what they're demo-ing at the BigDaddy DC.

BB

--
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html kruse (AT) crystal-liaison (DOT) com
Gifty! Shiny! BB!

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:35:11 +0100, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com>
wrote:

very good records of my exact keyphrase searches each time. So don't
take my word for it but I would suspect that we should get some
movements within a couple of weeks.

Shouldn't there be a PR update starting soon?

Define "soon" - or "soon by Google"

But that's what I expect too.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:15:14 +0100, Paul B <webmaster (AT) firstpeople (DOT) us>
wrote:

My rankings seem to drop, then go up, then drop yadda yadda yadda.

I dont know if Bigdaddy has anything to do with it, but things are
rather strange. We could do with another PR update. They should be
every two months IMO.

And my SERPs in Bigdaddy are identical to these in all other DCs.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:57:36 +0100, Borek
<m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:15:14 +0100, Paul B <webmaster (AT) firstpeople (DOT) us
wrote:

<snip>

And my SERPs in Bigdaddy are identical to these in all other DCs.

Best,
Borek

Really Borek ?
What about DC's :

216.239.37.147
216.239.37.105
which both show 0 (probably dead DCs now)

and :
64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.105
64.233.171.147
which have different IBL's and PR

plh
Paul



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:02:45 +0100, Paul B <webmaster (AT) firstpeople (DOT) us>
wrote:

And my SERPs in Bigdaddy are identical to these in all other DCs.

Really Borek ?
What about DC's :

216.239.37.147
216.239.37.105
which both show 0 (probably dead DCs now)

and :
64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.105
64.233.171.147
which have different IBL's and PR

What I mean is that yesterday I have compared results from all DCs
shown by McDar - and they were identical (like 9th everywhere - IBL
and PR discrepancies ignored). I was especially interested in Bigdaddy
(66.249.93.104) results and they were no different.

Today it looks like Bigdaddy likes me a little bit more than other
DCs, like 7th instead of 9th, or 5th instead of 7th, depending on
the KW. But these are hardly substantial differences - shifts
1 or 2 positions up or down happen occasionally.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:21:42 +0100, Borek
<m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:02:45 +0100, Paul B <webmaster (AT) firstpeople (DOT) us
wrote:

And my SERPs in Bigdaddy are identical to these in all other DCs.

Really Borek ?
What about DC's :

216.239.37.147
216.239.37.105
which both show 0 (probably dead DCs now)

and :
64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.105
64.233.171.147
which have different IBL's and PR

What I mean is that yesterday I have compared results from all DCs
shown by McDar - and they were identical (like 9th everywhere - IBL
and PR discrepancies ignored). I was especially interested in Bigdaddy
(66.249.93.104) results and they were no different.

Today it looks like Bigdaddy likes me a little bit more than other
DCs, like 7th instead of 9th, or 5th instead of 7th, depending on
the KW. But these are hardly substantial differences - shifts
1 or 2 positions up or down happen occasionally.

Best,
Borek

Ah, I thought you were seeing something different than I was
plh
Paul


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:50:45 -0500, "--Fred--"
canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Paul B" <webmaster (AT) firstpeople (DOT) us> wrote in message
news:iq8ms1leml0inj30hubtfg5gavb6eipls5 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On 16 Jan 2006 04:35:11 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

"--Fred--" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

very good records of my exact keyphrase searches each time. So don't
take my word for it but I would suspect that we should get some
movements within a couple of weeks.

Shouldn't there be a PR update starting soon?

Something is happening John.
Have you looked at your cached date on your homepage.
No doubt google caches yours every day too.

I have noticed this recently that it caches the page and shows it has
been cached on todays date. You check later or next day and it has
reverted back to an older date.

The sites (i've looked at) seem to be last cached on 5th jan - but
most are 30st dec - 1st jan.

May be something is going to happen. Last year we had it on jan 1st.

My sites are getting respidered every second day, yet there is no movement
in rankings in my keyphrase competitions. Nothing moves but everything get
analyzed repeatedly. My hunch is that they are testing a new ranking
system
again, something revolutionary again, and are not ready to release it to
the
public yet.

Which is what they're demo-ing at the BigDaddy DC.

BB

I've been in the bush tooo long. Just got back this month. Thanks Bill for
making me aware.

http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/32710.htm

Fred