More Google love ....

http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=542

Check out news.google.com and see headline news for tech and business
and ZDNET features in the top 10. ZDNET has an article again slamming
Google even with a fake Google logo all dripping and waning.

"I have been questioning Google's motivations and power since the
Spring, at this Digital Micro-Markets Blog, when I put forth "Ten
Questions for Google," to help Google be more forthcoming in an
upcoming Investor Conference Call"

On 15 Oct 2006 22:32:01 -0700, "Logician" <sales (AT) logicians (DOT) com> wrote:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=542

Check out news.google.com and see headline news for tech and business
and ZDNET features in the top 10. ZDNET has an article again slamming
Google even with a fake Google logo all dripping and waning.

"I have been questioning Google's motivations and power since the
Spring, at this Digital Micro-Markets Blog, when I put forth "Ten
Questions for Google," to help Google be more forthcoming in an
upcoming Investor Conference Call"

You should join Googlewatch. http://www.google-watch.org/

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm

Big Bill wrote:

On 15 Oct 2006 22:32:01 -0700, "Logician" <sales (AT) logicians (DOT) com> wrote:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=542

Check out news.google.com and see headline news for tech and business
and ZDNET features in the top 10. ZDNET has an article again slamming
Google even with a fake Google logo all dripping and waning.

"I have been questioning Google's motivations and power since the
Spring, at this Digital Micro-Markets Blog, when I put forth "Ten
Questions for Google," to help Google be more forthcoming in an
upcoming Investor Conference Call"

You should join Googlewatch. http://www.google-watch.org/

I already saw that site.

The point about the ZDNET style of articles is that they reflect a
growing dislike of Google which is expressed by highly ranked people. I
already included Gates' famous quote: "I'm goin fuckin kill Google."

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm

ogician wrote:

Big Bill wrote:
On 15 Oct 2006 22:32:01 -0700, "Logician" <sales (AT) logicians (DOT) com> wrote:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=542

Check out news.google.com and see headline news for tech and business
and ZDNET features in the top 10. ZDNET has an article again slamming
Google even with a fake Google logo all dripping and waning.

"I have been questioning Google's motivations and power since the
Spring, at this Digital Micro-Markets Blog, when I put forth "Ten
Questions for Google," to help Google be more forthcoming in an
upcoming Investor Conference Call"

You should join Googlewatch. http://www.google-watch.org/

I already saw that site.

The point about the ZDNET style of articles is that they reflect a
growing dislike of Google which is expressed by highly ranked people. I
already included Gates' famous quote: "I'm goin fuckin kill Google."


BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm

Fuckin Nazies.... I mean google-watch of course!
And i have a feeling execs from Microsoft are definately are behind the gang.
All the gest things on the internet, half of them were from google,
including gmail wich changed my life? Best minds in the biz are
employed there.

-Privacy? And Internet?!? give me a break, privacy+internet iz
synonimous with Hitler+justice or Bush+common sence. Everything your
EVER send, especially email gets tranced and recorded somewhere one way
or another, either in transaction log, or even in plain text. I bet
that US government storing thing f*cking post on their servers right
the time I am sending it (not because I'm using google account, it does
the same with hotmail or yahoo).
And how the f*ck Hotmail is more private? Since they were forced to
upgrade from 2 to 250 megabytes, CAN YOU BIEVE IT?? If not for the
gmail reform, the would be sucking your guts together with all internal
organs now in exchange of their scanky service for some mega-obtrusive
advertising.

Why the privacy matters so you anyways, what are you - a terrorist? If
you are planning to send something secret, than dont use internet! or
use encryption. Ther are billion emails sent every day, and what
somebody is going to read particularly your every letter, on personal
stuff like what you think on that guy or girl and whom did she/he slept
with during the last month, give me a break!
If you are planning to overthrogh the government, i would send plain
text anyway. BTW i'm joking, i dont want you even if they killed your
Mom - just forgive them instead.

And yes, Billy and the Boys hate Google, big time!


Big Bill wrote:

On 15 Oct 2006 22:32:01 -0700, "Logician" <sales (AT) logicians (DOT) com> wrote:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=542

Check out news.google.com and see headline news for tech and business
and ZDNET features in the top 10. ZDNET has an article again slamming
Google even with a fake Google logo all dripping and waning.

"I have been questioning Google's motivations and power since the
Spring, at this Digital Micro-Markets Blog, when I put forth "Ten
Questions for Google," to help Google be more forthcoming in an
upcoming Investor Conference Call"

You should join Googlewatch. http://www.google-watch.org/

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm

Fuckin Nazies.... I mean google-watch of course!
And i have a feeling execs from Microsoft are definately are behind the gang.
All the gest things on the internet, half of them were from google,
including gmail wich changed my life? Best minds in the biz are
employed there.

-Privacy? And Internet?!? give me a break, privacy+internet iz
synonimous with Hitler+justice or Bush+common sence. Everything your
EVER send, especially email gets tranced and recorded somewhere one way
or another, either in transaction log, or even in plain text. I bet
that US government storing thing f*cking post on their servers right
the time I am sending it (not because I'm using google account, it does
the same with hotmail or yahoo).
And how the f*ck Hotmail is more private? Since they were forced to
upgrade from 2 to 250 megabytes, CAN YOU BIEVE IT?? If not for the
gmail reform, the would be sucking your guts together with all internal
organs now in exchange of their scanky service for some mega-obtrusive
advertising.

Why the privacy matters so you anyways, what are you - a terrorist? If
you are planning to send something secret, than dont use internet! or
use encryption. Ther are billion emails sent every day, and what
somebody is going to read particularly your every letter, on personal
stuff like what you think on that guy or girl and whom did she/he slept
with during the last month, give me a break!
If you are planning to overthrogh the government, i would send plain
text anyway. BTW i'm joking, i dont want you even if they killed your
Mom - just forgive them instead.

And yes, Billy and the Boys hate Google, big time!


Big Bill wrote:

On 15 Oct 2006 22:32:01 -0700, "Logician" <sales (AT) logicians (DOT) com> wrote:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=542

Check out news.google.com and see headline news for tech and business
and ZDNET features in the top 10. ZDNET has an article again slamming
Google even with a fake Google logo all dripping and waning.

"I have been questioning Google's motivations and power since the
Spring, at this Digital Micro-Markets Blog, when I put forth "Ten
Questions for Google," to help Google be more forthcoming in an
upcoming Investor Conference Call"

You should join Googlewatch. http://www.google-watch.org/

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm

I love Google.

My backwards links count has recently tripled.

Both my internal and DMOZ clone links are starting to appear, once
again. Who knows in a few more months my my backwards links count will
be what it actually should be. And, my home page will once again have
a PR of 6/10, which it once did for close to a year.

Now, if Google was only intellingent enough to combine my
WWW.domain.com name with my domain.com site name; Google would almost
be like heaven.

Just thougth that ALL you SEO droogies might want to know.

On 24 Oct 2006 06:47:20 -0700,
"johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com"
<johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com> wrote:

I love Google.

My backwards links count has recently tripled.

Both my internal and DMOZ clone links are starting to appear, once
again. Who knows in a few more months my my backwards links count will
be what it actually should be. And, my home page will once again have
a PR of 6/10, which it once did for close to a year.

Now, if Google was only intellingent enough to combine my
WWW.domain.com name with my domain.com site name; Google would almost
be like heaven.

Just thougth that ALL you SEO droogies might want to know.

You can do that with the Google webmaster tools, there's an option to
tell Google to consider the home url the www or the non-www one.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm

Big Bill wrote:

On 24 Oct 2006 06:47:20 -0700,
"johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com"
johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com> wrote:


I love Google.

My backwards links count has recently tripled.

Both my internal and DMOZ clone links are starting to appear, once
again. Who knows in a few more months my my backwards links count will
be what it actually should be. And, my home page will once again have
a PR of 6/10, which it once did for close to a year.

Now, if Google was only intellingent enough to combine my
WWW.domain.com name with my domain.com site name; Google would almost
be like heaven.

Just thougth that ALL you SEO droogies might want to know.

You can do that with the Google webmaster tools, there's an option to
tell Google to consider the home url the www or the non-www one.

Too bad their tool don't work.

On 24 Oct 2006 13:30:46 -0700,
"johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com"
<johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com> wrote:

Big Bill wrote:
On 24 Oct 2006 06:47:20 -0700,
"johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com"
johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com> wrote:


I love Google.

My backwards links count has recently tripled.

Both my internal and DMOZ clone links are starting to appear, once
again. Who knows in a few more months my my backwards links count will
be what it actually should be. And, my home page will once again have
a PR of 6/10, which it once did for close to a year.

Now, if Google was only intellingent enough to combine my
WWW.domain.com name with my domain.com site name; Google would almost
be like heaven.

Just thougth that ALL you SEO droogies might want to know.

You can do that with the Google webmaster tools, there's an option to
tell Google to consider the home url the www or the non-www one.

Too bad their tool don't work.

I agree. Have you tried it though? Do you have a Google account? Have
you set up a preference with the Google tool? Or are you just mouthing
off again?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm