![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
z wrote: Microsoft have sometimes added JavaScript to their sites to break functionality in Firefox. Don't use Microsoft tools, web sites, services, and software, and encourage other people to avoid MS also. If you have ever taken any MS certified classes, you are familiar with the phrase "the microsoft way". MS was founded on the theft and reverse engineering of a Macintosh. MS has to steal and deceive in order to survive; that is their "way". If you work for MS, they will teach you in the training how to lie, cheat, and steal in order to survive as an inferior product. They were fined by the US Supreme court for using their w95 monopoly power to rip-off their customers; when w98 released with the same issues they were stating that they don't care if it is illegal because they can make more money by screwing their clients than it will cost them in fines. MS was ordered to compensate my state's university something like $75 million dollars for overcharging them for products. Microsoft products are anti-productive and barely work with their sixty-billion bug complex. I've seen some of the new improvements for this vista crap that they say is coming soon - the new vista features are the same tools that I have been using for years on my Mac (only reverse engineered in a code that they don't want you to see because it is bug-ridden). Although I have been using ms word for grammar checking, excel for spreadsheets, and IE to check browser compatability - these are the only three programs that can actually crash my system (not a coincidence that they are all inferior microcrap products). How long will it take before windows users realize that maintenance isn't supposed to consume 20% of your work day? How long before they realize that there is an easier to use and more powerful parallel universe on Macs that hasn't been infected by millions of viruses and spyware? How long until they realize that MS is spyware that has been spread like a virus? The solution is simple: don't use windows, don't use microsoft crapware. Eventually the process of natural selection will devour their entire company as people realize that MS is actually just a group of cheating thieves, that MS products aren't worth the time that it takes to maintain them, and that there are other products available that are more stable, have more features, and are open-sourced so you can be assured that you don't have a can of worms co-existing with your precious files. Microsoft knows they are looking at the "blue screen of death" and they are scared like a rat in a cage. |
|
Full Version ?Vista Ultimate $450 ?Vista Business $341 ... `---- |
|
While Microsoft's entry-level and upgrade prices might appear reasonable on paper to some, and little changed to the five-year-old Windows XP, there are a few clouds to this sliver lining. The first is the ability for machines running Windows XP to actually be able to run Windows Vista, as Microsoft's hardware guidance for new versions of Windows has tended historically towards the, ah, optimistic shall we say. [...] For consumers, Vista Home Basic does exactly what it says on the box - you get the an OS, browser, search and parental controls but no sexy Aero interface and no Windows Media Center (for watching and recording all those episodes of CSI: Miami, hooking up the Xbox 360, and viewing photos). Those little gems are reserved for users of Vista Home Premium, while Ultimate gives you all this plus additional power features from the business products like BitLocker encryption, support for domain group policy, and advanced and simplified networking. `---- |
|
Being forward looking is never cheap. We've configured a system that will run Vista superbly, but it's really not complete. The lack of practical high definition optical drives and DirectX 10 hardware means that the system will likely to be upgraded at least once in its lifetime. `---- |
|
January 30th may be the day that Vista is released, but it could also be the day that hordes of Windows users make the move over to Linux. `---- |
|
While we don't usually report on anything Microsoft related (as it's outside PCBurn's perview) this tidbit was too good for me to pass up. Microsoft is reporting (at El Reg) that by releasing an operating system it will magically create $40 Billion dollars rather than simply suck money out of Europe. They've done this by positing a story somewhat similar to the theory of "broken window" economics. `---- |
|
Drivers are Half-Done, Is There Really a Problem Here? It depends. Do you like the idea of buying an expensive video card to take advantage of the latest Vista technology only to discover that the drivers offered will not allow you to game at peak performance? The same problem could be said for web cams, soundcards, and other needed devices. And to be frank, it is beginning to look like a repeat of the same issue that we had to deal with Windows XP. `---- |
|
Microsoft is making its first Vista release candidate and pricing information more broadly available to partners and consumers this week. Solution providers who have seen it say it's not yet ready for prime time. [...] A number of partners and analysts who have downloaded Vista RC1 say the code is solid but they are not convinced it will be ready for release this fall. [...] One Microsoft analyst suggested the code is in good shape but he is not convinced that Vista Enterprise will be ready for volume licensed customers in November. "RC1 is in the best shape of anything they have shipped for Vista, but in the old nomenclature I would call this at best a Beta Three and not a Release Candidate One," said Mike Cherry... [...] "There are still major concerns about hardware and software interoperability, including the inability to get the tablet functionality working correctly," said the Microsoft solution provider, which is based in the Midwest. "Pricing looks high to me, especially the Ultimate package for $400. That is the cost of a low-end computer." `---- |
|
It's the UI, stupid. Actually, it's a stupid UI A few applications that need to be brought out back and shot `---- |
|
It hopes to have about 5 million testers checking out latest version of Windows update, as it tries to stamp out bugs. `---- |
|
Microsoft rushed what may be the final test version of its Windows Vista operating system to more than a million testers on Friday, trying to meet deadlines for its long-delayed commercial release. [...] In the interview posted by Microsoft, Mr. Hallauer said Vista would have fewer dreaded "blue screens of death," in which the operating system freezes and leaves the user with a blue display screen. Instead, Vista will automatically recover from such freezes and start over, without forcing the user to restart the system manually. `---- |
|
The VoleWare version is clunky, it requires you to download .net, but it does tell you which types of software will not work under Vista at the moment too. In my case Nero 7 Premium Nero will have to be uninstalled as well as a little thing called Sun J2SE Runtime Environment 5.0 Update 6. However, Vole says I will have no problem with any of my hardware and I will be able to install Vista's premium packs just as soon as I have mortgaged the house and sold the wife and the cat into slavery to afford it. The question is, which one is right? It seems that ATi want me to dump my Nvidia card and Microsoft wants me to abandon Java. We wonder what they are really trying to say? `---- |
|
Vista's still a mess. It's meant to be at release candidate stage, yet vendor's are struggling to provide sufficient driver support, features are still missing or not yet complete, and its performance compared to XP is still poor. Nowadays hardware is cheap, and it would be sufficiently acceptable to upgrade in anticipation of a wonderfully revolutionary OS. Unfortunately Vista provides little to no benefit for end users compared to that of the previous version of Windows, released five years ago in 2001. There are no upgrades or features to the OS that are sufficiently compelling to make upgrading a necessity, some which were earlier promised, allowed for sufficient reason for an upgrade to be considered, but these have been removed one by one over the course of Vista's prolonged patchy road of development, and now Vista appears little more than an ill-performing version of XP with a glorified interface. `---- |
|
The complaints about sluggish performance in Windows Vista keep growing. While it's unfair to point to beta software apps -- whatever Microsoft wants to call them -- the warning flags are already evident. [...] Asato observed that the demo games of Mahjong and Solitaire included with the Beta ran "awfully slow," even with the drivers written for Vista. His system has a 2.8GHz Intel P4 processor, 768MB of memory and an ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP, which he admits is not the most recent GPU, "but it's no slouch." `---- |
|
Unfortunately, after many months of using Windows Vista, I conclude that Microsoft has placed a thick security facade around the operating system that impedes usability compared to Windows XP. The comparison to XP is important. Microsoft must emphasize user benefits to show potential customers that the current operating system isn't good enough compared to Windows Vista. If the experience isn't better--as in much better--customers will be less likely to rush out and buy off-the-shelf upgrades or new Windows Vista PCs. Neither situation would be good for Microsoft partners. [...] For me, Internet Explorer 7 security warnings are so much a nuisance I now mainly use Firefox, which is a dramatic change. For years, I continued to use and defend IE to Firefox switchers. Firefox is safe enough without all the security noise. `---- |
|
'Since installing Vista, I have found that my MacBook Pro runs hot. No doubt Microsoft hasn't worked on power management issues that might affect Apple hardware, which leaves me to wonder whether I'm slowly cooking the motherboard of my laptop. It's not hot enough to fry an egg on the aluminum case, but my laptop is noticeably warmer than when I use Mac OS X. I've also noticed that battery life is substantially reduced. Once again, energy management for Apple hardware is not likely at the top of Microsoft's list. Once Apple writes updated drivers to work with Vista, I'd expect these issues to be addressed.' `---- |
|
One of Vista's big security features is 'User Account Protection' (or 'User Account Control') which pops up and asks for user authentication before software can make any administrative changes to the system. But the TweakVista utility can turn off UAP in one click... `---- |
|
Microsoft's Vista developers can't catch a break these days. After years of warnings from security researchers that old code in Windows was creating security risks, the software giant decided to rewrite key parts of the operating system. The result? Last month, Symantec published a report suggesting all of this new code will introduce new security problems. "The network stack in Windows Vista was rewritten from the ground up. In deciding to rewrite the stack, Microsoft has removed a large body of tried and tested code and replaced it," Symantec wrote, noting that it found vulnerabilities in the Windows Vista networking software. "Despite the claims of Microsoft developers, the Windows Vista network stack as it exist today is less stable than the earlier Windows XP stack," it said after examining a beta release of the software. After years of being blamed for countless security problems, Microsoft may be in a no-win situation. `---- |
|
Unfortunately, Bill Gates is not a wizard. Even worse, he is a bad programmer. When Martin Eller, a Microsoft programmer, found an error in the flood fill routine of the MS-Basic interpreter, he exclaimed "Which moron wrote this brainless sh*t?" only to find out it was Gates himself who wrote the "brainless sh*t". I think it is safe to say that Bill Gates is hardly the technical wizard he would so much like to be. [...] Of course, this way of working simply couldn't continue. This had to go wrong one time. I don't mean the viruses, the spyware or the overall security (or lack of it). Microsoft tolerates the bugs riddling the software, since problems can always be patched over. However, with each patch and enhancement, it becomes harder to strap new features onto the software, since new code can affect everything else in unpredictable ways. In short, the software becomes unmaintainable. And Vista reached that point. `---- |
|
In the first part of this series, I mentioned how Jim Allchin came in, saved the day and everything was hunky dory again. Wrong. The story that "Windows was broken" came out in September, 2005. The same month a blog was published about the up and coming reorganization of Microsoft, stating that is was "just shuffling the chairs on the deck of the Titanic". [...] Six months later, the programmers seem to have come close to a mutiny, saying "Fire the leadership now!", saying "People need to be fired and moved out of Microsoft today. Where's the freakin' accountability"? [...] One day later, David Richards reports: "Up to 60% of the code in the new consumer version of Microsoft new Vista operating system is set to be rewritten as the Company 'scrambles' to fix internal problems a Microsoft insider has confirmed to SHN. (..) Microsoft has also admitted that it has major problems in it's Windows division and has has immediately initiated a total restructure of the division, a move that comes after a costly delay in rolling out its Vista program. (..) An internal memo written by Kevin Johnson the Co-President of the Windows division has revealed the changes that the Windows division faces: 'As part of the next step of Jim's transition, we discussed when it was appropriate to move his direct reports to me, and decided that this organization change was the right time.'" [...] Less than three months later, Bill Gates decides to resign. Even more features are scrapped in a desperate attempt to hit the release date. Now even the major networks are beginning to pick up the problems at Microsoft, like ABC ("What's wrong with Microsoft") and CNN ("A reality check for Vista"). [...] You may or may not like Linux, but I promise you that the next guy who has the guts to publish an article like "Is Linux ready for the desktop?", I'll personally come over and punch his lights out! You say Aero, we got Xgl. You say WinFS, we got Beagle. You say Monad, we got plenty of those! [...] So, those of you who still think Microsoft will pull it off easily, are you still that convinced? Microsoft is seeking help with Xen, an Open Source company. [...] IBM went down when they introduced their PS/2 line of products. It should have been their finest hour. Microsoft may share the same fate. It will certainly not be the end of the giant, but it will be the end of a reign of terror. Still not convinced? I will give a Microsoft employee the last word: "It scares me that this is what Linux does today, it?s free. Open Office is free. I can do anything on the 'free' platform that I can do on Windows. Eventually it will be like an old sweater that I am comfy with. Wait 10 years and watch as these folks graduate and move into positions of influence. Its no longer a hard migration issue -- that generation will be comfy with Linux and it will be the kind of decision (if not easier) that was made when corporations moved from OS/2 or DOS to Windows. No need to train.. What the hell is Windows anyway? I truly believe that was a big factor that drove our platform; we were able to get the stuff for almost free. Give it away to students.." `---- |
|
So here's a modest proposal: Boycott Vista. Keep your old Windows XP PC around. Don't buy a new one. That's the only way we have to let Microsoft know Vista is an overhyped, late, and pointless update to XP - a perfectly fine operating system. `---- |
|
As a geek, why would you not want to run multiple operating systems on the same piece of hardware? People have dual booted between Linux and Windows for years. And if you think Linux is still worse off than Windows, watch this video. You?ll wonder when Microsoft will get over itself long enough to create a unique user experience half as compelling. I usually support myself in Windows, so I?m likely to support myself equally in Linux or OS X. [...] Oh, and Vista's not faring well with the 64-bit stuff according to reports - so even this Windows situation is going to get worse before it comes close to getting better. `---- |
|
There's Linux, there's OsX and there's Windows at the very bottom. On this site you'll be able to see each OS in action, showing some of their visual capabilities, and XGL pretty much kicks ass! It's just too laughable, Microsoft has been developing Vista since 2001, and this is what they got in the visual compartment, a 3D way of tabbing programs. Hurray! This is neat and all, but XGL is so much more, and the really funny thing is, that Vista requires "state of the art" hardware, at least fairly new hardware, for it to operate with its"?graphics". Whereas XGL can be run on low-end machines, pretty much not eating any resources, and yet its so much farther up and beyond anything in Vista's visual range it's almost not to believe. It's been a good run Microsoft, it really has, but I think it may be time to retire. Commercial/proprietary software has minimal or no place in the future of computing, deal with it. `---- |
|
Vista looks like a pile of crap compared to Mac OS X and Ubuntu with GLX. Their software is buggy, overpriced, and stress inducing. Their development tools are staid, designed and developed by committees to solve every problem you could ever conceive of, while being ideally suited to solving none. `---- |
|
Microsoft Corp.'s Business Solutions group senior vice president Doug Burgum will resign, effective June 30, and leave the company to pursue other opportunities, the company said on Tuesday. `---- |
|
A number of my projects in Vista got cut and then my post-Vista work was continually held up but the whims of other teams. `---- |
|
...Ann McLaughlin Korologos, chairman of the RAND Corp. board of trustees, has decided not to seek re-election to Microsoft's board of directors at the company's 2006 shareholder meeting. `---- |
|
Niall Kennedy, a high-profile hire from Technorati who joined Microsoft in April 2006 as Program Manager for syndication with the Windows Live team, has quit. And quit with a bang. From Kennedy's "Leaving Microsoft" post: "Windows Live is under some heavy change, reorganization, pullback, and general paralysis and unfortunately my ability to perform, hire, and execute was completely frozen as well." Ouch. Kennedy is off to do a startup, according to his blog, as of August 18. `---- |
|
Jesper Johansson, a high-profile security guru at Microsoft, has left the company. `---- |
|
Time Warner's AOL has hired a Microsoft manager as chief technical evangelist for AOL's wireless group, AOL said on Tuesday. `---- |
|
XenSource, a start-up commercializing the open-source Xen virtualization software, said Thursday it has hired Gordon Mangione as senior vice president of product operations. `---- |
|
Snyder most recently served as principal and founder of Matasano Security, a New York-based startup that was one of several external penetration testers hired by Microsoft to conduct simulated hacking attacks on Windows Vista. `---- |
|
Lots of echoes in the chamber rolled up at TechMeme. Rumblings of cut-backs and paralysis and Microsoft being the new IBM. I certainlya gree with the desire for Microsoft to be a way smaller company (thoughI think every time I say that, or ring a bell, 100 more people get hired). I'm not bought into the split-up, except for the sobering benefit of cutting off the cash-cow money flow that allows an abundance of waste and bad decisions elsewhere in the company. `---- |
|
"The current, integrated architecture of Microsoft Windows is unsustainable - for enterprises and for Microsoft," (Gartner) `---- |
|
As SaaS (Software as a Service) and Web 2.0 apps take center stage, there is less and less motivation for customers to plunk down their dollars for a completely proprietary OS, and I see Linux gaining steam in that environment unless we are able to do something significant. `---- |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
the phrase "the microsoft way". MS was founded on the theft and reverse engineering of a Macintosh. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 17 Sep 2006 John Bokma wrote in alt.internet.search-engines I am amazed at the number of idiots this group seems to attract Hi John ![]() |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 17 Sep 2006 John Bokma wrote in alt.internet.search-engines Duende <myusenet (AT) sify (DOT) com> wrote: On 17 Sep 2006 John Bokma wrote in alt.internet.search-engines I am amazed at the number of idiots this group seems to attract Hi John ![]() :-) Hi Duende, long time no talk. I hope everything is well. All is well here except now I seem to be an idiot. ![]() |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
"SEOwebMarket.com" <webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote: the phrase "the microsoft way". MS was founded on the theft and reverse engineering of a Macintosh. |
#16
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
John Bokma wrote: "SEOwebMarket.com" <webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote: the phrase "the microsoft way". MS was founded on the theft and reverse engineering of a Macintosh. LOL, for the uneducated "idiots", the movie is called "Pirates of Silicone Valley". True story about how windows is just a reverse engineered, bug-ridden, make-shift immitation of the first Apple computer. |
|
has rewritten the entire system (OSX) in open-source code and based it on a secure UNIX kernel |
|
that doesn't crash even while running 64-bit and 32-bit apps side by side - so now microcrap can spend more time trying to debug their pathetic immitation and spend less time cheating and stealing secrets. It's been open-source for a few years now and the clowns at microcrap still can't figure it out. |
|
Mac has been able to run windows (in a window) since before 2000. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
But I do only write nonsense. I thought the bit about operating systems was optional. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
"SEOwebMarket.com" <webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote: John Bokma wrote: "SEOwebMarket.com" <webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote: the phrase "the microsoft way". MS was founded on the theft and reverse engineering of a Macintosh. LOL, for the uneducated "idiots", the movie is called "Pirates of Silicone Valley". True story about how windows is just a reverse engineered, bug-ridden, make-shift immitation of the first Apple computer. Funny, since I always heard that both Jobs and Gates visited Xerox. You know, that place where the mouse and the GUI was *invented*. Since then, Apple has rewritten the entire system (OSX) in open-source code and based it on a secure UNIX kernel There is very little you *do* know about yes? that doesn't crash even while running 64-bit and 32-bit apps side by side - so now microcrap can spend more time trying to debug their pathetic immitation and spend less time cheating and stealing secrets. It's been open-source for a few years now and the clowns at microcrap still can't figure it out. In the mean time MS has still the largest market share, and will so for several years to come :-) Mac has been able to run windows (in a window) since before 2000. Why is there a need for such a thing if it's perfect? :-D. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 17 Sep 2006 John Bokma wrote in alt.internet.search-engines Duende <myusenet (AT) sify (DOT) com> wrote: On 17 Sep 2006 John Bokma wrote in alt.internet.search-engines I am amazed at the number of idiots this group seems to attract Hi John ![]() :-) Hi Duende, long time no talk. I hope everything is well. All is well here except now I seem to be an idiot. ![]() |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
...and John defends Microsoft. Behind the apologetic face, there's the John who sought to buy an Apple and also thought about Ubuntu Linux recently. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |