![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Assistance with meta tags. I understand not to spam the description with to many of the same or non relevant keywords but my question is as follows about keywords. I am working with a furniture manufacture and need to enter the keywords for the site. I don't want the search engines to tag the pages as spamming and need some sound advise. In the meta name ="keyword" tag we need to add such items as coffee tables, end tables, dining tables, accent tables, conference tables, chess tables, wood tables, dining furniture, living room furniture, office furniture, patio furniture and so on. My question is what would be the best way to get all the types of tables and furniture items in without being considered spamming an would the example above be considered spamming? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
The words: Talk to the manufacturer and the existing sales people and try to find out what their hoped for customers are likely to type into Google. Write down all the phrases that they can think of - analyse the list - and then make up a home page with all the words in similar (*) proportions in the body text itself - with subsidiary pages concentrating on specific pairs or triplets of words. (*) rare words can be in reduced proportions Test every word with: http://inventory.overture.com/d/sear...ry/suggestion/ to help your imagination. As a guess if you have 100 words total you need 7 table, 7 furniture, 7 manufacturer, 5 coffee, 3 kitchen, 3 dining, etc. More than 7% of one word may penalise you on some search engines. Try to think like a customer - "furniture maker in Blackpool", "chair repairer Fleetwood", "luxury coffee table London", "commerical work tables", "test benches", "wholesale school chairs", "desks" etc The Title Needs to be something like "Table and furniture manufacturer: ABC Furniture" Not "ABC Limited Home page" Avoid repeating the same word more than two times. If possible start with a letter A, as some results are in alphabetical order. The Description Needs to be something like what you suggest: "coffee tables, end tables, dining tables, accent tables, conference tables, chess tables, wood tables, dining furniture, living room furniture, office furniture, patio furniture" *But* take out 4 tables and 1 furniture so they do not appear more than 3 times. Incorporate a couple more keywords like your town and county. A few human appealing words are a good idea as humans read the search results and pick promising sites e.g. "Friendly family company making quality furniture etc etc " Don't waste words on repeating the company name unless it is so well known that people will use that name in their search input. Start the description with a large meaningful word, with the first letter only capitalised. Keywords meta Hardly worth bothering with - Google ignores it. Put in 7 words in decending order of significance. All these words must be in the body text as well. Other hints: Don't use frames Make the page as short as possible by removing all unnecessary characters. Unnecessary characters (like having a 100 meta keywords!) just dilutes all your good work. Use a text editor and clean out all the rubbish. Don't use alt text for pictures unless the picture is a link (purists can use alt=""). Do use alt text for pictures which are links. Don't use loads of comments !-- -- On all your subsidiary pages use links that point back to your home page with anchor text like: "Table and furniture manufacturer: coffee, dining, home, office" or perhaps a picture button "Home Page" but with alt text "Table and furniture manufacturer: coffee, dining, home, office" Best regards, Eric. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Use a text editor and clean out all the rubbish. Don't use alt text for pictures unless the picture is a link (purists can use alt=""). Do use alt text for pictures which are links. Don't use loads of comments |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Eric, By and large I think your advice is very sound. However, I must take issue with your direction not to use the alt attribute in images that are not links. My daughter is a computer user and I'm sure you will agree she has as much right to use the Internet as you, I or anyone else. Yet she is also blind and without considerate Web designers including the alt attribute on every image, she is being barred from "seeing" what most other people take for granted and I am sure you will also agree that that is hardly fair. The only justification for using alt="" is for "non-content" images such as spacer gifs; even graphical bullets should have some alt content - alt="*" on a bullet graphic goes a long way towards enhancing the Internet experience for users of non-graphical interfaces. I find it a shame that you class such content as "rubbish" and I would suggest that you perhaps launch your browser some day with the images disabled, start surfing as usual and then time how long it takes for you to become disheartened / disillusioned / frustrated / annoyed (or all of the above) with the proliferation of blank squares that you will encounter. As I said, I do think that everything else you advise is noteworthy and I have no problem agreeing wholeheartedly with it, however this is an issue about which I feel very strongly since such scant use of the alt attribute undermines the interoperability that no less an organisation than the W3C strives towards. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |