Linking inernal pages?

#1

Hi Everyone,

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely? I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

Thanks a lot,

Bob

#2

Nobody have a thought on this one?

Bob

"BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com> wrote

Quote:

Hi Everyone,

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely? I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in
terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

Thanks a lot,

Bob

#3

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:21:08 GMT, "BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com>
wrote:

Quote:

Nobody have a thought on this one?

Bob

Assuming your site map is built round normal text links and not
shrouded in layers of javascript, then you're fine with just that.

BB

Quote:

"BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com> wrote in message
news:%xeUc.8009$54.119839 (AT) typhoon (DOT) sonic.net...
Hi Everyone,

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely? I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in
terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

Thanks a lot,

Bob

#4

Hello Bill,

Yes, everything is normal html links in both Navigation Buttons on each page
and on the Site Map.

Do you think I gain anything by having the footer as well or am I just being
redundant?

Thanks Bill,

Bob

"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:21:08 GMT, "BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com
wrote:

Nobody have a thought on this one?

Bob

Assuming your site map is built round normal text links and not
shrouded in layers of javascript, then you're fine with just that.

BB

"BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com> wrote in message
news:%xeUc.8009$54.119839 (AT) typhoon (DOT) sonic.net...
Hi Everyone,

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I
have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely?
I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in
terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

Thanks a lot,

Bob

#5

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:33:48 GMT, "BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com>
wrote:

Quote:

Hello Bill,

Yes, everything is normal html links in both Navigation Buttons on each page
and on the Site Map.

Do you think I gain anything by having the footer as well or am I just being
redundant?

Thanks Bill,

Bob

If you have working links on the site map, preferably with a word or
two of description, and preferably with descriptive anchor text,
anything else is superfluous. That I can think of off-hand anyhoo.

BB

Quote:

"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:j10ai0dn45s6otnsvedpnfv17bf8poqv5u (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:21:08 GMT, "BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com
wrote:

Nobody have a thought on this one?

Bob

Assuming your site map is built round normal text links and not
shrouded in layers of javascript, then you're fine with just that.

BB

"BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com> wrote in message
news:%xeUc.8009$54.119839 (AT) typhoon (DOT) sonic.net...
Hi Everyone,

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I
have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely?
I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in
terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

Thanks a lot,

Bob

#6

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:01:15 +0000, BobK wrote:

Quote:

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely? I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

I might run it through Martin's PR calculator and see what happens.

--
Will
Webmaster: http://www.internet-search-engines-faq.com

#7

"Will Spencer" <will.spencer (AT) internet-search-engines-faq (DOT) com> wrote in
message
news

an.2004.08.20.01.09.45.770000 (AT) internet-search-engines-faq (DOT) com...

Quote:

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:01:15 +0000, BobK wrote:

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I
have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely? I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in
terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

I might run it through Martin's PR calculator and see what happens.

--
Will
Webmaster: http://www.internet-search-engines-faq.com

Thanks Bill and Will.

Will, you lost me on the Martin's PR calculator. I know it's a joke but what
is it?

Bob

#8

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:55:07 GMT, "BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com>
wrote:

Quote:

"Will Spencer" <will.spencer (AT) internet-search-engines-faq (DOT) com> wrote in
message
news

an.2004.08.20.01.09.45.770000 (AT) internet-search-engines-faq (DOT) com...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:01:15 +0000, BobK wrote:

I have all of my pages 100% interlinked at www.usernomics.com . But I
have
done it in three ways: Navigation Buttons, Site Map, and Footer.

Do you think I would loose anything by removing the footer completely? I
mean, do I need the footer, given the other two linking structures, in
terms
of getting similar page rank across the site?

I might run it through Martin's PR calculator and see what happens.

--
Will
Webmaster: http://www.internet-search-engines-faq.com

Thanks Bill and Will.

Will, you lost me on the Martin's PR calculator. I know it's a joke but what
is it?

Bob

It's Norwegian. That means it only makes sense if you're eight foot
high and chilly.

BB

#9

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:55:07 +0000, BobK wrote:

Quote:

Will, you lost me on the Martin's PR calculator. I know it's a joke but what
is it?

http://www.pagerank.dk/index.html

This is indeed difficult for non-Danes to understand, even with the bright
colors.

But... it can theoretically help to understand how PR flows internally
throughout your site.

--
Will
Webmaster: http://www.internet-search-engines-faq.com

#10

Big Bill wrote in
<k83bi01guthkoo01rh4dqp0uc9fjpvel18 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>

Quote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:55:07 GMT, "BobK" <rk1@usernomics[no spam].com
wrote:

Will, you lost me on the Martin's PR calculator. I know it's a joke
but what is it?

It's Norwegian. That means it only makes sense if you're eight foot
high and chilly.

I'd suggest taking immediate cover, BB.

--
PeterMcC
If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
inappropriate or offensive in any way,
please ignore it and accept my apologies.