Link Building advice

"T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote:

"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A01BD78E801Ccastleamber (AT) 130 (DOT) 133.1.4...
"T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote:

"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote in message

What you suggested sounds to me like manual referer spam. And
people get soon tired of manual, and come up with a scripted
solution....


Thje principal behind it is that you make webmasters
of the similar websites aware of you in an attempt to
build up a relationship.

And a nice relationship it is: a webmaster putting a link on his/her
site, and manually clicking on it once or twice a week to get
attention....

I give up, goodbye

Anyway, I hope you get that your advice is grey to say the least...

--
John Bokma http://johnbokma.com/

Forget about building backlinks because backlinks and link popularity
along with toolbar pagerank are dead as dinosaurs at Google and Yahoo
and they no longer count or mean a hill of beans to ranking anymore. You
can have thousands of high pagerank backlinks from other related sites
and still be listed no where for your search terms while a site with 0
backlinks and a PR of 0 can be listed as number 1 of page 1 for its
search terms these days. That's because the google and yahoo algos are
completely based now having hundreds to thousands of internal pages at
your site and that is all ranking is based on these days. If you don't
believe me then check the sites on page 1 of most serps and check their
PR and backlinks (link:url.com) and then check site:url.com and you will
see that most high ranked sites have hundreds to thousands of totally
useless internal pages they've created to rank well at google and yahoo
but most of these same sites will have very low PR and very low
backlinks. This is where search is at today on the internet! Enjoy!

"Sam" <sam (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

<snip>

Once posted ok twice spam. You know the rules Sam.

Stacey
--
Jezsta Web Productions
SEO Tips - Website Design - Marketing
http://jezsta.com/

Once posted ok twice spam. You know the rules Sam.

Well, yes. But it's complete bollocks anyway:

If you don't believe me then check the sites on page 1 of
most serps and check their PR and backlinks (link:url.com)
and then check ..

As just about _EVERYONE_ ought to know by now, Google broke the link:
search quite deliberately over two years ago. Even the Webmaster
Tools link function only shows a sample, and that sample _can_ indeed
be zero. All this is dealt with in the FAQ to the Google Support
Group. You can't do link management with Google - period.

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:05:03 -0800, Sam <sam (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote:

Forget about building backlinks because backlinks and link popularity
along with toolbar pagerank are dead as dinosaurs at Google and Yahoo
and they no longer count or mean a hill of beans to ranking anymore.

You been to webworld Sam?

You
can have thousands of high pagerank backlinks from other related sites
and still be listed no where for your search terms while a site with 0
backlinks and a PR of 0 can be listed as number 1 of page 1 for its
search terms these days. That's because the google and yahoo algos are
completely based now having hundreds to thousands of internal pages at
your site and that is all ranking is based on these days.

So the more pages with relevant content the better? That's been the
case for ages.

If you don't
believe me then check the sites on page 1 of most serps and check their
PR and backlinks (link:url.com) and then check site:url.com and you will
see that most high ranked sites have hundreds to thousands of totally
useless internal pages they've created to rank well at google and yahoo
but most of these same sites will have very low PR and very low
backlinks. This is where search is at today on the internet! Enjoy!

Example?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/