![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
If the URL of a links page contains the word "link" (for example, www.somename.com/links/ or www.somename.com/link_03.html), would it adversely effect that links page's PR? I've heard some time before that it could. By looking at the link pages on my website, I might suspect this could be the case, but I am still not sure. Is it worth re-designing the link URLs to exclude the l-word considering my link pages are ranked (PR3 and PR4 -- though the home page is PR6) and already contain a decent amount of links to other sites, and their owners might not be happy to see PR0 for the substitute links pages, though temporarily? -- Thanks. Mark. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
If the URL of a links page contains the word "link" (for example, www.somename.com/links/ or www.somename.com/link_03.html), would it adversely effect that links page's PR? I've heard some time before that it could. By looking at the link pages on my website, I might suspect this could be the case, but I am still not sure. Is it worth re-designing the link URLs to exclude the l-word considering my link pages are ranked (PR3 and PR4 -- though the home page is PR6) and already contain a decent amount of links to other sites, and their owners might not be happy to see PR0 for the substitute links pages, though temporarily? -- Thanks. Mark. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I don't know the answer to that. But a question comes to mind: It will take you a maximum of 3 to 4 seconds to rename a page whatever you'd like. So what's the big deal? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
The big deal is that all my links pages become PR0 or PR<grey> till at least the next Google PR update, and the webmasters linked to me might dislike this fact, you know. I might looses a good deal of incoming links. And this is a big deal, I would think. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |