Jill Whalen vs Robin Nobles; seconds away - ding!

Put keyword phrases inside noframes tags on frameless sites, suggests
Robin.
Disgusting, responds Jill.
Does the team have any opinions here?

BB
MFW Britpack www.extreme-positioning.co.uk
There is only one war, and it's not the rich against the poor,
the blacks against the whites, the Federation against the Borg,
or the Democrats versus the Republicans. It's those of us who
aren't complete idiots against those of us who are.

Big Bill wrote:

Put keyword phrases inside noframes tags on frameless sites, suggests
Robin.
Disgusting, responds Jill.
Does the team have any opinions here?

sounds like a maintenance headache to me and ...

which doctype would you use for such a page?

--
William Tasso - http://www.WilliamTasso.com

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:40:31 +0100, "William Tasso" <ngx (AT) tbdata (DOT) com>
wrote:

Big Bill wrote:
Put keyword phrases inside noframes tags on frameless sites, suggests
Robin.
Disgusting, responds Jill.
Does the team have any opinions here?


sounds like a maintenance headache to me and ...

which doctype would you use for such a page?

I don't use doctypes. Nor charsets.

BB
MFW Britpack www.extreme-positioning.co.uk
There is only one war, and it's not the rich against the poor,
the blacks against the whites, the Federation against the Borg,
or the Democrats versus the Republicans. It's those of us who
aren't complete idiots against those of us who are.

"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:40:31 +0100, "William Tasso" <ngx (AT) tbdata (DOT) com
Big Bill wrote:
Put keyword phrases inside noframes tags on frameless sites, suggests
Robin.
Disgusting, responds Jill.
Does the team have any opinions here?

sounds like a maintenance headache to me and ...

which doctype would you use for such a page?

I don't use doctypes. Nor charsets.

Which is presumably why your pages don't validate?
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...oning.co.uk%2F

....and even assuming (relatively relaxed) HTML 4.01 with iso-8859-1
encoding, the W3C validator reports 251 html errors on your page:
<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...k%2Fextreme-po
sitioning.htm&doctype=HTML+4.01+Transitional&chars et=iso-8859-1+%28Western+E
urope%29>
(or http://tinyurl.com/h8ow )

James

"William Tasso" <ngx (AT) tbdata (DOT) com> wrote in news:bf4nce$b8e1v$1@ID-
139074.news.uni-berlin.de:

Big Bill wrote:
Put keyword phrases inside noframes tags on frameless sites, suggests
Robin.
Disgusting, responds Jill.
Does the team have any opinions here?


sounds like a maintenance headache to me and ...

You could easily call the keywords from a database, at the same time as you
called the content. Then call the keywords into a field within your CMS at
the same time as the content, same as you can with metadata (if you feel
the need).

which doctype would you use for such a page?

If you're prepared to do something spammy like use noframes for no good
reason, I suspect validation is not your number one priority.

I wouldn't do it because sure as eggs are eggs, it'll start getting
penalised as most keyword hiding systems do. Strikes me as a rather clumsy
approach anyway, and very easy to detect/penalise.

Victoria

--
Clare Associates Ltd
http://www.clareassoc.co.uk/
01822 835802
--