HighDots Forums  

[News] Search Engines Relevance Benchmark

Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)


Discuss [News] Search Engines Relevance Benchmark in the Search Engine Optimization forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Roy Schestowitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default [News] Search Engines Relevance Benchmark - 05-02-2006 , 03:50 PM






Google, Yahoo!, MSN.com, Ask.com Search Engine Study Released

,----[ Quote ]
Quote:
Cincinnati, Ohio - (Cheap Web Hosting Directory) - May 2, 2006 - Google,
Yahoo!, MSN.com, Ask.com and three other search engines have been
evaluated on relevancy and other factors to determine which search
engine delivered the most relevant results over a broad range of
searches.
`----

http://www.cheaphostingdirectory.com...ased-2014.html

This looks fairly amateur to me, but it made the news...


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Phil Payne
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Search Engines Relevance Benchmark - 05-02-2006 , 05:01 PM






Quote:
http://www.cheaphostingdirectory.com...msn-com-ask-co...

This looks fairly amateur to me, but it made the news...
Considering the frequency with which the Ask and Yahoo bots turn up on
my sites, their "freshness" score is no surprise. Neither is the
"staleness" of Google's searches.



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Roy Schestowitz
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Search Engines Relevance Benchmark - 05-03-2006 , 09:29 AM



__/ [ Phil Payne ] on Tuesday 02 May 2006 22:01 \__

Quote:
http://www.cheaphostingdirectory.com...msn-com-ask-co...

This looks fairly amateur to me, but it made the news...

Considering the frequency with which the Ask and Yahoo bots turn up on
my sites, their "freshness" score is no surprise. Neither is the
"staleness" of Google's searches.
Try Google News for anything that has recently been published. It improves
rapidly. Recently they added the "suggest as you type" feature (much like
Google Suggest)...

http://news.google.com/news?complete=1

As for the study in question, the experiments could be carefully doctored to
support the hypothesis. If this study placed Google at the top, there would
not be much interest. It would *not* have stood out. I have seen
circumstances where particular search phrases are chosen -- ones with a
particular nature, e.g. heavilily spammed or a matter fortunate. I haven't
looked into the study in depth, but I'm sure it relatively flawed. As I said
before, that Web page looks very amateur. The graphs look as though a
15-year-old produced them as homework in Excel/Calc/other.

Best wishes,

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Reversi for Linux/Win32: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
2:20pm up 5 days 21:17, 12 users, load average: 0.75, 0.76, 0.72
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.