HighDots Forums  

Google itself sucks at SEO

Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)


Discuss Google itself sucks at SEO in the Search Engine Optimization forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
KimmoA
 
Posts: n/a

Default Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 11:25 AM






Take a look at this:
http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655

No headers. How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!


Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
properly ranking our pages then?

Hmm.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Paul
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 11:32 AM






On 9 Sep 2006 08:25:42 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Take a look at this:
http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655

No headers.
So ?

Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is wrong.
Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.

Quote:
How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!

Don't have to be in a search engine to find pages.
Afterall, you found it.
And if you can find it, then anyone can LOL

Quote:
Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
properly ranking our pages then?
Ask Matt Cutts.

Google it, you will find him.

Quote:
Hmm.
--
Handmade Jewelry
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/earrings-107.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-213.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
KimmoA
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 11:39 AM



Paul wrote:
Quote:
Take a look at this:
http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655

No headers.

So ?
Yeah... it's quite obvious why this is pretty insane.

Quote:
Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is wrong.
Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.
Um... Google... is a... search... engine...

Quote:
How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!


Don't have to be in a search engine to find pages.
Afterall, you found it.
And if you can find it, then anyone can LOL
Oookay...

Quote:
Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
properly ranking our pages then?

Ask Matt Cutts.
Shouldn't he reply himself?



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Proud-Collector.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 11:44 AM



Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search
anyway. I do agree with the message bit though.

KimmoA wrote:
Quote:
Take a look at this:
http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655

No headers. How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!


Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
properly ranking our pages then?

Hmm.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
www.1-script.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 11:47 AM



Paul wrote:

Quote:
So ?

Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is
wrong.
Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.
Even more: they are openly anti-SEO company.

--
Cheers,
Dmitri
See Site Sig Below



--
+------------------------------------------------+
Quote:
Follow alt.internet.search-engines threads |
with your Firefox Live Bookmarks! Set it up at |
http://www.1-script.com/forums/ |
+------------------------------------------------+



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
KimmoA
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 11:49 AM



Proud-Collector.com wrote:
Quote:
Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search
anyway.
Yeah... they have PR 10 for all their domains. They are sooo biased!

Quote:
I do agree with the message bit though.
Good! ^_^

PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
IRL by replying before the quote!



Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Proud-Collector.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 11:55 AM



KimmoA wrote:
Quote:
Proud-Collector.com wrote:
Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search
anyway.

Yeah... they have PR 10 for all their domains. They are sooo biased!

I do agree with the message bit though.

Good! ^_^

PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
IRL by replying before the quote!
That was a little harsh.



Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Paul
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 12:02 PM



On 9 Sep 2006 08:55:30 -0700, "Proud-Collector.com"
<webmaster (AT) proud-collector (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
That was a little harsh.
He is a troll. Trolls do that.

--
Handmade Jewelry
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/earrings-107.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-213.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
KimmoA
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 12:16 PM



www.1-script.com wrote:
Quote:
Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.

Even more: they are openly anti-SEO company.
Huh?

Proud-Collector.com wrote:
Quote:
PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
IRL by replying before the quote!

That was a little harsh.
I know. But it's true! And, as the smiley suggests, it was not a
serious insult.

Paul wrote:
Quote:
That was a little harsh.

He is a troll. Trolls do that.
Stop trolling, troll.



Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Paul
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Google itself sucks at SEO - 09-09-2006 , 12:23 PM



On 9 Sep 2006 09:16:31 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Proud-Collector.com wrote:
PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
IRL by replying before the quote!

That was a little harsh.

I know. But it's true! And, as the smiley suggests, it was not a
serious insult.

Paul wrote:
That was a little harsh.

He is a troll. Trolls do that.

Stop trolling, troll.
Learn to post properly you IDIOT.

I DID NOT say
Quote:
Paul wrote:
That was a little harsh.
Troll.

--
Handmade Jewelry
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/earrings-107.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-213.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.