![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Take a look at this: http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655 No headers. |
How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!![]() |
|
Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of properly ranking our pages then? |

|
Hmm. |
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Take a look at this: http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655 No headers. So ? |
|
Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is wrong. Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company. |
How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!![]() Don't have to be in a search engine to find pages. Afterall, you found it. And if you can find it, then anyone can LOL |
|
Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of properly ranking our pages then? Ask Matt Cutts. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Take a look at this: http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655 No headers. How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?! ![]() Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of properly ranking our pages then? Hmm. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
So ? Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is wrong. Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company. |
|
Follow alt.internet.search-engines threads | with your Firefox Live Bookmarks! Set it up at | http://www.1-script.com/forums/ | +------------------------------------------------+ |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search anyway. |

|
I do agree with the message bit though. |

#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Proud-Collector.com wrote: Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search anyway. Yeah... they have PR 10 for all their domains. They are sooo biased! ![]() I do agree with the message bit though. Good! ^_^ PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls IRL by replying before the quote! ![]() |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
That was a little harsh. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company. Even more: they are openly anti-SEO company. |
|
PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls IRL by replying before the quote! ![]() That was a little harsh. |
|
That was a little harsh. He is a troll. Trolls do that. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Proud-Collector.com wrote: PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls IRL by replying before the quote! ![]() That was a little harsh. I know. But it's true! And, as the smiley suggests, it was not a serious insult. Paul wrote: That was a little harsh. He is a troll. Trolls do that. Stop trolling, troll. |
|
Paul wrote: That was a little harsh. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |