Has my site been unbanned??

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it not.
There's still no results for the site: search but it's only one page anyway.

Thanks,
Georgie

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net>
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it not.

The way I see it, yes.
If it was greyed out, then you should worry.

There's still no results for the site: search but it's only one page anyway.

You won't have results. All it says is "Ringtones website is currently
down. Expected to be online again in Summer 2006. While you wait,
check out some other free ringtone websites."

Hardly inspires spiders to keep coming back, so if I were you I would
add some content. Not only that, some of the sites linking to may
remove their links as you have nothing to offer anyone. And if that
happens, then you could go back to PR0

Thanks,
Georgie

plh

Paul

--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it not.

The way I see it, yes.

I concur with Paul.

If it was greyed out, then you should worry.

Not necessarily. Google is broken. *wink* Well, not toolbar PageRank, _yet_.

There's still no results for the site: search but it's only one page
anyway.

You won't have results. All it says is "Ringtones website is currently
down. Expected to be online again in Summer 2006. While you wait,
check out some other free ringtone websites."

*gasp* Did I hear "ringtone"?! Are you by any chance one of the arseholes
that shower my blogs with hundreds of spam comments? I hate poker. I hate
ringtones. I even almost, just _almost_, hate pr0n.

Hardly inspires spiders to keep coming back, so if I were you I would
add some content. Not only that, some of the sites linking to may
remove their links as you have nothing to offer anyone. And if that
happens, then you could go back to PR0

Whatever you do, keep it clean. And whatever it is that got you banned in the
first place, I imagine that you very much deserved it. Your niche is a
whorehouse that kills Web 2.0 (defined as "things that can be spammed").
Sorry to have been so direct and prejudiced...

Best wishes,

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Computers are useless. They only solve problems"
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
8:00pm up 39 days 1:33, 11 users, load average: 5.19, 4.52, 3.96
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it not.
The way I see it, yes.


I concur with Paul.


If it was greyed out, then you should worry.


Not necessarily. Google is broken. *wink* Well, not toolbar PageRank, _yet_.

Toolbar Pagerank has been broken from day 1, it never showed the true
PR. It was merely there to give the boy's something to play with.

There's still no results for the site: search but it's only one page
anyway.
You won't have results. All it says is "Ringtones website is currently
down. Expected to be online again in Summer 2006. While you wait,
check out some other free ringtone websites."


*gasp* Did I hear "ringtone"?! Are you by any chance one of the arseholes
that shower my blogs with hundreds of spam comments? I hate poker. I hate
ringtones. I even almost, just _almost_, hate pr0n.

The latter is merely a glitch of manhood.

Hardly inspires spiders to keep coming back, so if I were you I would
add some content. Not only that, some of the sites linking to may
remove their links as you have nothing to offer anyone. And if that
happens, then you could go back to PR0


Whatever you do, keep it clean. And whatever it is that got you banned in the
first place, I imagine that you very much deserved it. Your niche is a
whorehouse that kills Web 2.0 (defined as "things that can be spammed").
Sorry to have been so direct and prejudiced...

The fact that the whole niche is, doesn't make him a ... well you know.
Now a days, even SEO is becomming a jucky word. And god knows what these
these pimps are up to.


--
Webontwerp: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:49:37 +0200, tonnie <t.prasinge (AT) chello (DOT) nl>
wrote:

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it not.
The way I see it, yes.


I concur with Paul.


If it was greyed out, then you should worry.


Not necessarily. Google is broken. *wink* Well, not toolbar PageRank, _yet_.

Toolbar Pagerank has been broken from day 1, it never showed the true
PR. It was merely there to give the boy's something to play with.

Not exactly true. It's not broken, it is updated in undefined periods.
Just because it shows a fixed PR for long periods of time does not
mean it's broken.

Anyway, that is not what we were on about.
Anyone with some sense would check with other sites to see if the
problem was across the board, or just the one site.

If it was acorss the board, you would not worry about it. But if your
site, or some pages on your site were like it, then it is a different
matter.

plh
Paul

--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

__/ [ tonnie ] on Monday 05 June 2006 20:49 \__

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it not.
The way I see it, yes.


I concur with Paul.


If it was greyed out, then you should worry.


Not necessarily. Google is broken. *wink* Well, not toolbar PageRank,
_yet_.

Toolbar Pagerank has been broken from day 1, it never showed the true
PR. It was merely there to give the boy's something to play with.

No, that's pr0n.

There's still no results for the site: search but it's only one page
anyway.
You won't have results. All it says is "Ringtones website is currently
down. Expected to be online again in Summer 2006. While you wait,
check out some other free ringtone websites."


*gasp* Did I hear "ringtone"?! Are you by any chance one of the arseholes
that shower my blogs with hundreds of spam comments? I hate poker. I hate
ringtones. I even almost, just _almost_, hate pr0n.

The latter is merely a glitch of manhood.

Oh, there's this other industry and niche that I totally forgot about. It
offers remedies to 'glitches of manhood'.

Hardly inspires spiders to keep coming back, so if I were you I would
add some content. Not only that, some of the sites linking to may
remove their links as you have nothing to offer anyone. And if that
happens, then you could go back to PR0


Whatever you do, keep it clean. And whatever it is that got you banned in
the first place, I imagine that you very much deserved it. Your niche is a
whorehouse that kills Web 2.0 (defined as "things that can be spammed").
Sorry to have been so direct and prejudiced...

The fact that the whole niche is, doesn't make him a ... well you know.
Now a days, even SEO is becomming a jucky word. And god knows what these
these pimps are up to.

The same thing with the hacker-cracker crossover. I have come to the point of
being 'ashamed' of being in some hackers mailing lists. The word got
associated with troublemaking and wrongdoing; not justifiable so. Even some
spammers would say they do SEO, as means of embellishing their daytime job
description and make it sound like an occupation.

Best wishes,

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Disk quota exceeded; sig discontinued"
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
8:55pm up 39 days 2:28, 11 users, load average: 3.37, 3.41, 3.41
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote

__/ [ tonnie ] on Monday 05 June 2006 20:49 \__

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it
not.
The way I see it, yes.


I concur with Paul.


If it was greyed out, then you should worry.


Not necessarily. Google is broken. *wink* Well, not toolbar PageRank,
_yet_.

Toolbar Pagerank has been broken from day 1, it never showed the true
PR. It was merely there to give the boy's something to play with.


No, that's pr0n.

Sometime girls like to play.:-)

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:12:38 +0200, "Stacey"
<Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:27395171.UodJ9NUoCn (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com...
__/ [ tonnie ] on Monday 05 June 2006 20:49 \__

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.

<snip>

No, that's pr0n.

Sometime girls like to play.:-)

Come on Stacey, don't stop there, tell us more

--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Paul" <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:12:38 +0200, "Stacey"
Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:27395171.UodJ9NUoCn (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com...
__/ [ tonnie ] on Monday 05 June 2006 20:49 \__

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was
no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to
0.

snip

No, that's pr0n.

Sometime girls like to play.:-)

Come on Stacey, don't stop there, tell us more

No, that's pr0n.:-)

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 23:00:48 +0200, "Stacey"
<Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"Paul" <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ic4982tv7ccco57eqrseklkmel5svklsr9 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:12:38 +0200, "Stacey"
Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:27395171.UodJ9NUoCn (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com...
__/ [ tonnie ] on Monday 05 June 2006 20:49 \__

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind (AT) eircom (DOT) net
wrote:

My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was
no
results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to
0.

snip

No, that's pr0n.

Sometime girls like to play.:-)

Come on Stacey, don't stop there, tell us more

No, that's pr0n.:-)

Dang, and I got a box of kleenex ready

--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----