![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
| http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...071948043E9%7D Google's share of U.S. search market dips in July SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Google Inc.'s share of the U.S. Internet search market dipped a full percentage point in July when compared to June's total, according to research released Friday by comScore Networks Inc. While Google's (GOOG : news, chart, profile ) still the dominant provider of Internet search both in the U.S. and worldwide, what comScore noted Friday has some ominous overtones for the Mountain View, Calif.-based firm, Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. analyst Robert Peck wrote in a note to clients Friday. "We think (the) loss in domestic market share could signal a topping point" for Google, he wrote. "We do not expect Google's aggressive market share gains to continue in perpetuity." According to comScore, 43.7% of all search queries conducted in the United States in July used a Google search engine, down from the 44.7% attributed to Google the month before. Meanwhile, Google's loss was its competitors' gain. ComScore reports No. 2 Internet search engine Yahoo Search, from Yahoo Inc., (YHOO : news, chart, profile ) saw its share of U.S. Internet search queries increase to 28.8% in July from 28.5% the month before. Meanwhile search engine AOL's U.S. share was up to 5.9% in July from the 5.6% it garnered in June, comScore notes. Also soaking up Google's U.S. losses was Ask, owned by IAC Search & Media (IACI : news, chart, profile ) . The Ask search engine's U.S. market share rose to 5.4% in July from 5.1% in June, comScore reported. No. 3 search engine MSN from Microsoft Corp. (MSFT : news, chart, profile ) retained its 12.8% share of the U.S. market in July, comScore reported. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I read that a couple of days ago |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:13:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: I read that a couple of days ago Same here. History, not news. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 21 August 2006 06:21 \__ On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:13:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: I read that a couple of days ago Same here. History, not news. Here is some news: http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=357 Google CEO wants $74 billion TV ad market Brother O' brother! It's Big Brother. http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:27:08 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: __/ [ Paul ] on Monday 21 August 2006 06:21 \__ On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:13:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: I read that a couple of days ago Same here. History, not news. Here is some news: http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=357 Google CEO wants $74 billion TV ad market Brother O' brother! It's Big Brother. http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html 'Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes television viewers should not have to stand for tv commercials that are "a waste of your time."' Shame the same doesn't go for gmail spam. |
|
Symantec presented a trilogy report following a generalized evaluation of the operating system's network stack, User Account Control (UAC) technology and kernel mode security and stated an instability diagnosis concluding that Vista will deliver an inferior level of protection compared to its predecessor. And Symantec is not a singular case in this regard; security experts from Agnitum have pointed the finger at Microsoft for eliminating third party proactive protection by denying kernel control via the altering of the Service Dispatch Table through the implementation of Kernel Patch Protection. [...] The sins of the father... Microsoft's incubatory exorcism failed, Vista vulnerabilities proved inherent to the system, a collateral baggage of the code source genealogy. `---- |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 21 August 2006 06:36 \__ On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:27:08 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: __/ [ Paul ] on Monday 21 August 2006 06:21 \__ On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:13:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: I read that a couple of days ago Same here. History, not news. Here is some news: http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=357 Google CEO wants $74 billion TV ad market Brother O' brother! It's Big Brother. http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html 'Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes television viewers should not have to stand for tv commercials that are "a waste of your time."' Shame the same doesn't go for gmail spam. That's a good one! I read about the connections between GMail and SPAM, but thought it was a baseless and grossly-exaggerated accusation. To be fair, the vast majority of SPAM (over 80%) is being sent from hijacked Windows PC's (I can link to studies). |
|
The majority is the global E-mail traffic is, as a matter of fact, 'spewage' from Windows XP. DDOS attacks likewise. And it's not getting any better. Windows Vista Inherits the Sins of the Father ,----[ Quote ] | Symantec presented a trilogy report following a generalized evaluation | of the operating system's network stack, User Account Control (UAC) | technology and kernel mode security and stated an instability | diagnosis concluding that Vista will deliver an inferior level of | protection compared to its predecessor. | | And Symantec is not a singular case in this regard; security experts | from Agnitum have pointed the finger at Microsoft for eliminating third | party proactive protection by denying kernel control via the altering | of the Service Dispatch Table through the implementation of Kernel | Patch Protection. | | [...] | | The sins of the father... Microsoft's incubatory exorcism failed, | Vista vulnerabilities proved inherent to the system, a collateral | baggage of the code source genealogy. `---- http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windo...er-33279.shtml |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
__/ [ Paul ] on Monday 21 August 2006 06:21 \__ On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:13:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: I read that a couple of days ago Same here. History, not news. Here is some news: http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=357 Google CEO wants $74 billion TV ad market Brother O' brother! It's Big Brother. http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:21:48 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: __/ [ Paul ] on Monday 21 August 2006 06:36 \__ On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:27:08 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: __/ [ Paul ] on Monday 21 August 2006 06:21 \__ On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:13:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: I read that a couple of days ago Same here. History, not news. Here is some news: http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/index.php?p=357 Google CEO wants $74 billion TV ad market Brother O' brother! It's Big Brother. http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html 'Google CEO Eric Schmidt believes television viewers should not have to stand for tv commercials that are "a waste of your time."' Shame the same doesn't go for gmail spam. That's a good one! I read about the connections between GMail and SPAM, but thought it was a baseless and grossly-exaggerated accusation. To be fair, the vast majority of SPAM (over 80%) is being sent from hijacked Windows PC's (I can link to studies). So can I. Just deleted 18000 emails that bombarded my server. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |