![]() | |
#41
| |||
| |||
|
|
"canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1153846377.367203.98730 (AT) p79g2000cwp (DOT) googlegroups.com... Stacey wrote: snip What is the purpose of a outbound link? It is to facilitae a way for an Internet visitor to find more information on the sunbject at hand. You really want to rewrite Tonnie's page?:-) Oh I see what you mean. No, as it stands I don't want to link to it. The concept is good but the content is sub-standard. I'll be happy to correct it and then after it is uploaded I'll deem it acceptable for inclusion. LOL!! Actually no. I thought it(Tonnie's page)was good. In fact Tonnie makes real nice sites. I don't think it needs to be rewritten by you as you have some misspellings and most of the stuff you write doesn't make sense. It could be the bong or fishing gets in the way! snip the rest as it doesn't matter if you go to the grey area, just don't try boast about ethical |
|
snip the rest as it doesn't matter if you go to the grey area, just don't try boast about ethical |
#42
| |||
| |||
|
|
"canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1153824863.327094.165170 (AT) m79g2000cwm (DOT) googlegroups.com... Big Bill wrote: Snip We could all link to each other, I suppose, while we're on the subject. Any link intended to assist your Internet visitor is indisputably ethical. Links from relevant, semantically congruent ( http://canadian-web-site-promotion.b...keyphrase-anch ors-congruency.html ) web pages usually flows credibility to both web pages. I think it is a good idea if done naturally. Ah, so you do think reciprocal linking is ok? LOL. Doesn't matter how mcuh you sugar coat it and change the wording it is "reciprocal linking". Reciprocal linking isn't bad and sometimes it is the only way to gain links. |
#43
| |||
| |||
|
|
Stacey schreef: "tonnie" <t.prasing (AT) chello (DOT) nl> wrote in message news:4in1qeF4ht69U1 (AT) individual (DOT) net... Stacey schreef: "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1153846377.367203.98730 (AT) p79g2000cwp (DOT) googlegroups.com... Stacey wrote: snip What is the purpose of a outbound link? It is to facilitae a way for an Internet visitor to find more information on the sunbject at hand. You really want to rewrite Tonnie's page?:-) Oh I see what you mean. No, as it stands I don't want to link to it. The concept is good but the content is sub-standard. I'll be happy to correct it and then after it is uploaded I'll deem it acceptable for inclusion. LOL!! Actually no. I thought it(Tonnie's page)was good. In fact Tonnie makes real nice sites. I don't think it needs to be rewritten by you as you have some misspellings and most of the stuff you write doesn't make sense. It could be the bong or fishing gets in the way! snip the rest as it doesn't matter if you go to the grey area, just don't try boast about ethical Ah, this makes more sence to me. Ok, I am glad you are understanding it now.:-) I meant nothing against you Tonnie. As i wrote in another post, i am still trying to figure you out and in that proces i am easily going to misunderstand you. |
#44
| |||
| |||
|
|
However, although I'm certainly picking up on SEO stuff and incorporating it in my work, I'm nowhere near a SEO expert, |
|
I don't even have any info on the subject on any site. So I'd say Fred is right to not link to me. At least not on a page that says SEO experts. (Yet! ;-) ) |
#45
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1153824863.327094.165170 (AT) m79g2000cwm (DOT) googlegroups.com... Big Bill wrote: Snip We could all link to each other, I suppose, while we're on the subject. Any link intended to assist your Internet visitor is indisputably ethical. Links from relevant, semantically congruent ( http://canadian-web-site-promotion.b...keyphrase-anch ors-congruency.html ) web pages usually flows credibility to both web pages. I think it is a good idea if done naturally. Ah, so you do think reciprocal linking is ok? LOL. Doesn't matter how much you sugar coat it and change the wording it is "reciprocal linking". Reciprocal linking isn't bad and sometimes it is the only way to gain links. IMO, reciprocal linking is more like: can you put my link on your links page, then I add yours. |
|
I guess Fred is more talking about related linking. For example, someone keeps scorpions, and links to my page on scorpions, and I link back, because I consider it a great resource. We both consider each other an addition to our own pages. |
|
Note the "if done naturally". |
#46
| |||
| |||
|
|
Els <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl> wrote: However, although I'm certainly picking up on SEO stuff and incorporating it in my work, I'm nowhere near a SEO expert, You are better then a majority of self proclaimed SEO experts I have seen dropping in here :-) Moreover, because you use HTML semantically a lot of SEO is a piece of cake to you and also you understand why & in the value of the href attribute should be written as & and that it doesn't affect the actual URL in any way. I don't even have any info on the subject on any site. So I'd say Fred is right to not link to me. At least not on a page that says SEO experts. (Yet! ;-) ) And yet you can beat quite some people who want to have a link on that page ;-) Like I wrote: semantic HTML, your expertise, is already important for SEO, and it will certainly get more and more important. Moreover, visitors want (or better need) a site that's accessible: your expertise as well. When is one a SEO expert? I am sure this includes a firm understanding of semantic HTML and accessible webdesign. Those are important tools IMO. |
#47
| |||
| |||
|
|
canadafred wrote: Best Regards - Fred http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/ Hey Fred, You really want to go a little easier on hyphens in your domain name! I don't know about your REZULTZ ;-) but mine are not all that great on hyphenated domains and, although I've never used more than one myself, chances are you'll get hit by Google's latest quality score big times. It's a relatively new site, you will not loose much if you 301 it to something that's easier to spell. I think the sooner you do that the better. BTW, I can't believe canadafred.ca is not available - did you check it? I went back to this response and did a search for: |
#48
| |||
| |||
|
|
Stacey wrote: snip snip the rest as it doesn't matter if you go to the grey area, just don't try boast about ethical I don't think is called for and I did take offense to it. I'm not seeking or expecting a response from you on this issue. Out of professional respect for you and in respect for you as a person I wish to end this debate with you. |
#49
| |||
| |||
|
| www.1-script.com wrote: canadafred wrote: Best Regards - Fred http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/ Hey Fred, You really want to go a little easier on hyphens in your domain name! I don't know about your REZULTZ ;-) but mine are not all that great on hyphenated domains and, although I've never used more than one myself, chances are you'll get hit by Google's latest quality score big times. It's a relatively new site, you will not loose much if you 301 it to something that's easier to spell. I think the sooner you do that the better. BTW, I can't believe canadafred.ca is not available - did you check it? I went back to this response and did a search for: web site promotion expert mine is 14th with 4 domains above me using hyphens. To me this indicates hyphens in domain names are certainly not penalized. They may be negligible in value although it doesn't appear that way in my eyes. |
#50
| |||
| |||
|
|
John Bokma wrote: Els <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl> wrote: However, although I'm certainly picking up on SEO stuff and incorporating it in my work, I'm nowhere near a SEO expert, You are better then a majority of self proclaimed SEO experts I have seen dropping in here :-) Moreover, because you use HTML semantically a lot of SEO is a piece of cake to you and also you understand why & in the value of the href attribute should be written as & and that it doesn't affect the actual URL in any way. I don't even have any info on the subject on any site. So I'd say Fred is right to not link to me. At least not on a page that says SEO experts. (Yet! ;-) ) And yet you can beat quite some people who want to have a link on that page ;-) Like I wrote: semantic HTML, your expertise, is already important for SEO, and it will certainly get more and more important. Moreover, visitors want (or better need) a site that's accessible: your expertise as well. When is one a SEO expert? I am sure this includes a firm understanding of semantic HTML and accessible webdesign. Those are important tools IMO. All true. But still - listed as a SEO expert? For me, SEO is mainly a by-product of the way I build my sites. |

![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |