![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
We had a couple of posters recently complaining they weren't ranked with Yahoo. |
|
Listening, anyone? Do you have description tags throughout your site? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
While sitting in a puddle CarolW. scribbled in the mud: Do you have description tags throughout your site? *nod* But those won't help none if the Yahoo Slurp hasn't visited. Also - Yahoo is slower than molasses on updating their index. I have some pages that are 3 months old now and Yahoo claims "they don't exist" [in their index that is]. I would like to know how often Yahoo refreshes their index - right now, with what I have observed in relation to my sites, it appears to be around 6 to 8 months; which if true, that is waaaaay slow. time to donate up your cat. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
While sitting in a puddle CarolW. scribbled in the mud: Do you have description tags throughout your site? *nod* But those won't help none if the Yahoo Slurp hasn't visited. Also - Yahoo is slower than molasses on updating their index. I have some pages that are 3 months old now and Yahoo claims "they don't exist" [in their index that is]. I would like to know how often Yahoo refreshes their index - right now, with what I have observed in relation to my sites, it appears to be around 6 to 8 months; which if true, that is waaaaay slow. time to donate up your cat. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
We had a couple of posters recently complaining they weren't ranked with Yahoo. Listening, anyone? Do you have description tags throughout your site? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
My site is very popular with Google and MSN but nothing with Yahoo. I have been trying to figure this out for a couple years now. No one seems to have a clue why I am not listed. Here is my site www.mcnabs.com . Anyone have any idea why? Yahoo's spider visits my site just about every day. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Much as we ourselves do, it seems sometimes. Hey - you took all the links off from the side. That's good, site doesn't look so cluttered now. You know you have testimonials from previus Mcnabs clients? Why not simply call that real estate testimonials? or use Wordtracker to find out what related testimonials are being searched for and call the link that? See, stuff like that can help a lot. Do the engines know what a mcnab testimonial is? No - stupid, they! But they know what a real estate testimonial is, so use this opportunity to tell them that you have some! And then go through the site thinking like that. Yahoo we'll worry about later. Something odd is happening with Yahoo and indexing and I dunno what it is yet. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
I agree with you that my site can use some more tweaking but it should be ranked the way it is. I am not in the top 1000 for any keywords. I think I have been blacklisted in some way. I am listed in their directory but they refuse to update my title, description and category. I have been trying for years to get them to change them. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 07:35:29 -0700, "Mike" <add (AT) mcnabs (DOT) com> wrote: I agree with you that my site can use some more tweaking but it should be ranked the way it is. I am not in the top 1000 for any keywords. I think I have been blacklisted in some way. I am listed in their directory but they refuse to update my title, description and category. I have been trying for years to get them to change them. Yahoo early on - after releasing their new search - got a rep for penalizing sites they felt were trying to spam or trick their spiders somehow. The few that have gotten their sites relisted in Yahoo - "few" in this context meaning the 'few' that posted about being relisted - shared that they first wrote to Yahoo search to get confirmation that they were penalized/banned then fixed the problem[s] ... then waited a while [around 9 months average of a wait]. In other words, if you are banned or penalized on Yahoo - you will have to clean up the site to BEFORE asking to be reincluded - and Yahoo has been said to inform a person if their site has been penalized [removed from index] but they won't drop any hints about why outside "refer to our guidelines thoughts". If you feel you are penalized then I would look at the subdirectory set-up on your site where you have subdirectories' folders named to share the same keywords that the one page, in that subdirectory, also has in its file name. Such as /keyword1-keyword2-keyword3/keyword1-keyword2-keyword3.html Reason I suggest that is that at one time Yahoo, in their guidelines, dropped a big hint about _not_ liking people doing that - in terms of 'going out of their way' or 'excessively' using that naming technique due to knowing SEs noted keywords in the file names. Your site makes heavy use of this naming process - almost every page has its own subdirectory folder. Yahoo's guidelines wording changes often - I think they are on their 3rd or 4th 'revision' of that page. Some thoughts once shared are dropped - but that doesn't mean those thoughts are dropped by Yahoo Search, just dropped from being shared on the Guidelines page. Big Bill recalls them once saying that they leaned to valid HTML pages and now that is not listed - they also used to list "well-designed" and "site layout" as criteria and those two thoughts are not shared now either but they have retained, I think, the thought about not designing the site or laying out the site contents 'for search engines' and that is a nice gray area thought. Carol |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Does anyone know how to get Yahoo to unpenalize me? Do they have an email address to petition this banning? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |