Google sitemaps

Anybody try this out yet?

http://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/

RFM

"Fritz M" <nospam (AT) masoner (DOT) net> skrev i meddelandet
news:1117832867.060460.148570 (AT) o13g2000cwo (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Anybody try this out yet?

http://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/

RFM

I have not. But it sounds interesting. Actually, I was wondering how I could
create a good sitemap on the website
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
to help both Google and other search engines and users to find the pages
within the website.


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/

On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:07:47 +0200, Fritz M <nospam (AT) masoner (DOT) net> wrote:

http://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/

No. And I am not going to try on the website I am trying to get higher
SERPs on. Perhaps someone with test only-site?

BTW: was your pH test crawled? Or is it free account without log access
and you have no idea?

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com - chemical calculators for labs and education
BATE - Base Acid Titration and Equilibria
program for pH calculations
CASC - Concentration and Solution Calculator
program for solution preparation and concentration conversions

"Borek" <borek (AT) parts (DOT) bpp.to.com.remove.pl> skrev i meddelandet
newsp.srtjx6ci584cds (AT) borek (DOT) ..

On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:07:47 +0200, Fritz M <nospam (AT) masoner (DOT) net> wrote:

http://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/

No. And I am not going to try on the website I am trying to get higher
SERPs on. Perhaps someone with test only-site?

What do you think it might happen?

--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...e-i-bionaz.php

Fritz M wrote:

Anybody try this out yet?

http://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/

RFM

Quite a few people are skeptic about it. It appears to mainly help Google by
reducing bandwidth. Also, if a site is fragmented into bits, then creating
one unified feed is difficult and hard to maintain. It might be useful to
blog-only sites.

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com

Borek wrote:

BTW: was your pH test crawled? Or is it free account without log access
and you have no idea?

Yeah, no log access, which was a tactical mistake. I didn't want to put
it on a real hosted domain because I'm using spammy techniques (scraped
content, comment spam, etc) and I don't want my real sites banned.

The experiment was a poorly thought out waste of time, unfortunately.
I'll check it out again in a couple of months.

RFM

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 04:28:18 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote:

Fritz M wrote:

Anybody try this out yet?

http://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/

RFM

Quite a few people are skeptic about it. It appears to mainly help Google by
reducing bandwidth. Also, if a site is fragmented into bits, then creating
one unified feed is difficult and hard to maintain. It might be useful to
blog-only sites.

Roy

There's probably some kind of ulterior motive behind it anyway. If
people are too dumb to make their sites spiderable in the first place,
they're bound to be too dumb to properly implement the xml feed too. I
wonder if it isn't designed to help Google identify mininets or
something.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that watches the river flow...
--

Big Bill wrote:

There's probably some kind of ulterior motive behind it anyway. If
people are too dumb to make their sites spiderable in the first place,
they're bound to be too dumb to properly implement the xml feed too.

I kind of wondered, given Google's recent patent filing on all the
historic information pulled from sites, why they needed this? The
sitemap tool is a PITA too. I doubt that pages that have no external
linking to the Internet will show up in Google search even using
sitemaps... what do you think?