Google Linkbacks

I have a blog at KMM which is www.brainbasedbusiness.com and would like
to know how to create Google linkbacks. Yahoo lists many linkbacks to
my site and I am unsure who Google shows none. Can somebody help me
out. I use this in the comments...

<a href="http://www.brainbasedbusiness.com">Brain Based
Business</a>

.... and it should create a linkback that Google recognizes... or am I
doing it incorrectly. Many thanks for any suggestions you may have to
correct this.

__/ [ ellen ] on Monday 05 June 2006 04:51 \__

I have a blog at KMM which is www.brainbasedbusiness.com and would like
to know how to create Google linkbacks. Yahoo lists many linkbacks to
my site and I am unsure who Google shows none. Can somebody help me
out. I use this in the comments...

a href="http://www.brainbasedbusiness.com">Brain Based
Business</a

... and it should create a linkback that Google recognizes... or am I
doing it incorrectly. Many thanks for any suggestions you may have to
correct this.

Yahoo lists more backlinks than Google does, but they are equally visible to
both. You are shown just a subsample.

I am assuming that in the comments that you mention, the rel="nofollow" is
not employed.

Hope it helps,

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Error, no keyboard - press F1 to continue"
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
7:20am up 38 days 12:53, 11 users, load average: 0.54, 0.57, 0.81
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project

On 4 Jun 2006 20:51:55 -0700, "ellen" <eweber1 (AT) frontiernet (DOT) net> wrote:

I have a blog at KMM which is www.brainbasedbusiness.com and would like
to know how to create Google linkbacks. Yahoo lists many linkbacks to
my site and I am unsure who Google shows none. Can somebody help me
out. I use this in the comments...
a href="http://www.brainbasedbusiness.com">Brain Based
Business</a

... and it should create a linkback that Google recognizes... or am I
doing it incorrectly. Many thanks for any suggestions you may have to
correct this.

The link operator in Google doesn't work. On a good day it'll show a
random sample. It's been that way for ages. You can't really trust
information you get from Google anyway.

I'm beginning to think that we need a new FAQ on here we can direct
people to so we don't have to answer the same questions over and over.
One that isn't festooned with adverts, I mean.

BB



--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-services.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lempicka-prints.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/armani/index.html

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:29:49 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk>
wrote:

The link operator in Google doesn't work. On a good day it'll show a
random sample. It's been that way for ages.

I disagree on that BB
To say it is random means it will give a different set of results each
time.

I think a better way to phrase it would be the google returns a subset
of results that pass their algo.

plh
Paul


--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:42:25 -0500, Paul
<lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:29:49 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk
wrote:

The link operator in Google doesn't work. On a good day it'll show a
random sample. It's been that way for ages.

I disagree on that BB
To say it is random means it will give a different set of results each
time.

I think a better way to phrase it would be the google returns a subset
of results that pass their algo.

plh
Paul

I may do a page on it actually. I'm beginning to see each and every
SEO wrinkle as potentially good base material for creating additional
pages for my site. Can't hurt!

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-services.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lempicka-prints.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/armani/index.html

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:43:00 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk>
wrote:

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:42:25 -0500, Paul
lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:29:49 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk
wrote:

The link operator in Google doesn't work. On a good day it'll show a
random sample. It's been that way for ages.

I disagree on that BB
To say it is random means it will give a different set of results each
time.

I think a better way to phrase it would be the google returns a subset
of results that pass their algo.

plh
Paul

I may do a page on it actually. I'm beginning to see each and every
SEO wrinkle as potentially good base material for creating additional
pages for my site. Can't hurt!

BB

Good idea Bill, but you may want to block all Indian ISP's otherwise
10 million Indian SEO experts will have copied it within 24 hours
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----