Google itself sucks at SEO

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:32:23 -0700, tonnie wrote
(in article <4mjb2mF6aov4U1 (AT) individual (DOT) net>):

Do you think that anyone is going to take your postings seriously after
this one?

I for sure am not.

Grow up.




================================================== ==============
Hogwasher: You don't have to sacrifice friendliness for power
http://www.asar.com/cgi-bin/product....hogwasher.html
================================================== ==============

Small Bill schreef:

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:32:23 -0700, tonnie wrote
(in article <4mjb2mF6aov4U1 (AT) individual (DOT) net>):


Do you think that anyone is going to take your postings seriously after
this one?

I for sure am not.

Grow up.

Hm, small bill you are, with little brain you are. Just lets see what
Marc Benioff thinks of you abusing his emailadress.



--
Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html

On 10 Sep 2006 16:33:48 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

John Bokma wrote:
Wise word of advice: if the majority of a group is against you, just
ignore the majority. There is a small group that is neutral at this point,
but you are working very hard to make this group very small.

I don't really see how the first sentence and the second fit together
in this paragraph. However, if people (the majority) want to be idiots,
I'm not going to be like them just because they are the majority. If
they are wrong, I'll be sure to tell them about it.

I don't need random idiots to like me. As long as those few I consider
worthy of wasting my time and breath the same air as me are OK with me,
things are fine.

I think you are one of the good guys, but you never know. There are
lots of psycho stalkers and highly skilled trolls out there.

Actually, there aren't. In recent months we've had you and Brett
who've both been pointlessly aggressive from the off. Normally things
are fairly benign around here.

If you want to disrupt this group, the net cops will wake up and take
action. Just let it go, learn from others, and post your opinion *on*
topic.

What "net cops"? And I don't ruin my own threads by posting off-topic
nonsense...

No, you ruin them be being abusive to anyone who disagrees with you,
same as Brett.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...a-i137200.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...ngel-fish.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...aby-seals.html

Big Bill wrote:

No, you ruin them be being abusive to anyone who disagrees with you,
same as Brett.

I guess I can sound rude sometimes when I'm just being honest.

--
http://www.kimmoa.se/

On 11 Sep 2006 09:09:57 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Big Bill wrote:
No, you ruin them be being abusive to anyone who disagrees with you,
same as Brett.

I guess I can sound rude sometimes when I'm just being honest.

More diplomacy, less honesty.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...a-i137200.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...ngel-fish.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...aby-seals.html

KimmoA wrote:

Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
pages don't validate and lack real headers?

Erm... the head element looks reasonable enough to me. The lack of
validation, internal css and javascript is a bit crummy but they rank
1st out of 85 million for the search : "how do i create a sitemap file"
so they must be doing something right :-).

davidof wrote:

KimmoA wrote:
Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
pages don't validate and lack real headers?

Erm... the head element looks reasonable enough to me.

Riiight... Only there is no header element. Just a large normal text.

they rank 1st out of 85 million for the search : "how do i create a sitemap file"
so they must be doing something right :-).

Yeah... like running the most popular search engine in the world and
getting to rule entirely over every and any page.

--
http://www.kimmoa.se/

Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬) wrote:

Yeah... like running the most popular search engine in the world and
getting to rule entirely over every and any page.

So whats the problem with that?

If it's your game you make the rules that allow you to win.

Seems perfectly logical.

Um... yes, but they don't live as they learn.

--
http://www.kimmoa.se/

Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬) wrote:

Um... yes, but they don't live as they learn.

"Do as I say, not as I do" would be the English version, I guess yours
is an English translation of a Swedish saying that means the same thing?

Yeah. But I thought that the English version was identical. :S

--
http://www.kimmoa.se/