![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I just found a website in google which is index under it's domain name *and* under it's IP. Therefore the page is in the index twice. The page is using postNuke; the index from the IP-address did crawl the postnuke directory tree instead of the "normal" one it got by crawling the domain. http://194.209.107.37/postnuke/html/admin.php |
| http://www.skema.ch/ --> both pointing to the same Website |
|
Is this effect already known and google wants to index these pages twice? May this be just a temporary effect during google dance? Should I report this to the google staff? Maybe a report should be done by somebody else - one of the competitors of the organisation in question is my customer... |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Peter Guhl" <spamme (AT) gmx (DOT) ch> wrote in message news:bdbh4n$qfl$1 (AT) dc2-03-su-03 (DOT) t-systems.ch... I just found a website in google which is index under it's domain name *and* under it's IP. [...] --> both pointing to the same Website Not quite. Google's cached copy of these two pages *is* different. Perhaps the crawler found the first one, indexed and cached it; www.skema.ch updated their home page, then the crawler found the 'other' way to the site, checked it for duplicate content, didn't match it, and so indexed and cached it 'again'. |
|
Maybe a report should be done by somebody else - one of the competitors of the organisation in question is my customer... Why are you so keen to seem them reported for this... could it be because they're listed above your client in the SERPs? :-) |
|
It looks like this isn't a deliberate attempt to get listed twice, just a side effect of them using postnuke. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
James<james (AT) exim (DOT) dyndns.org> 25.06.2003 10:12:18 "Peter Guhl" <spamme (AT) gmx (DOT) ch> wrote in message news:bdbh4n$qfl$1 (AT) dc2-03-su-03 (DOT) t-systems.ch... I just found a website in google which is index under it's domain name *and* under it's IP. [...] --> both pointing to the same Website Not quite. Google's cached copy of these two pages *is* different. Perhaps the crawler found the first one, indexed and cached it; www.skema.ch updated their home page, then the crawler found the 'other' way to the site, checked it for duplicate content, didn't match it, and so indexed and cached it 'again'. I see Maybe a report should be done by somebody else - one of the competitors of the organisation in question is my customer... Why are you so keen to seem them reported for this... could it be because they're listed above your client in the SERPs? :-) They are on top of everything - so they are on top of my customer too. That's why I had been not a really good one to file any reports if any reports had been needed. They had suspected me - as you did... But I don't like to find the same stuff over and over again while searching the web. Therefore I had asked that question anyway and I will - as a user of Google - be happy if that situation does not persist; no matter which website it is (even if it had been my own!). It looks like this isn't a deliberate attempt to get listed twice, just a side effect of them using postnuke. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |