Google high / Yahoo low

On Google my site is at or near the top on many of my target keywords. Yet
on Yahoo it is not even in the top fifty. Obviously Yahoo is looking for
very different things than Google is. Any ideas as to what that is? Thanks
for any tips.

(If responding by email remove REMOVE)

"Neil W." <neilw (AT) REMOVEnetlib (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet
news:xrWpe.70827$NZ1.11840 (AT) fe09 (DOT) lga...

On Google my site is at or near the top on many of my target keywords. Yet
on Yahoo it is not even in the top fifty. Obviously Yahoo is looking for
very different things than Google is. Any ideas as to what that is?
Thanks
for any tips.

It is probably also true that Google is looking for different things than
Altavista and Yahoo...


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...na-chiessi.php

"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote

"Neil W." <neilw (AT) REMOVEnetlib (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet
news:xrWpe.70827$NZ1.11840 (AT) fe09 (DOT) lga...
On Google my site is at or near the top on many of my target keywords.
Yet
on Yahoo it is not even in the top fifty. Obviously Yahoo is looking for
very different things than Google is. Any ideas as to what that is?
Thanks
for any tips.


It is probably also true that Google is looking for different things than
Altavista and Yahoo...


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...na-chiessi.php

i dont know if its coincodence but my site www.iosilver.co.uk is top for
silver jewellery on msn/altavista/yahoo and bottom of page 1 for google i
use the same process, meta keywords repeated no more than 6 times and
description containing ONLY your target phrase (no other banter)
h1,2,3 etc tags contain keyword

HTH
mark

Niel,

I've noticed that my Google and Yahoo ranks seem to almost vary
inversely -- when one goes up the other seems to go down. I noticed
this in particular after we distributed a press release that was widely
picked up --- we had hundreds of incoming links for a while from folks
redistributing the content, and Yahoo loved it (ranks went way up),
while Google hated it (we disappeared from rankings). My guess at the
time was that Yahoo liked the links, but Google did not like the
duplicate content. When the press release was no longer carried on
folks's sites, our Yahoo ranks started dropping while Google began to
recover. Make sense?

Mark

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
http://www.idatatechnologies.com/Cle...pment-Firm.htm
- Cleveland, Ohio Web design and CMS development

On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:34:54 +0200, <mspidc01 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

this in particular after we distributed a press release that was widely
picked up --- we had hundreds of incoming links for a while from folks
redistributing the content, and Yahoo loved it (ranks went way up),
while Google hated it (we disappeared from rankings). My guess at the
time was that Yahoo liked the links, but Google did not like the
duplicate content. When the press release was no longer carried on

Perhaps you were penalized for fast increase in number of links?

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com - chemical calculators for labs and education
BATE - Base Acid Titration and Equilibria
program for pH calculations
CASC - Concentration and Solution Calculator
program for solution preparation and concentration conversions

On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:31:01 +0100, "mark | r"
<trooperbill (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:TtWpe.26902$d5.178161 (AT) newsb (DOT) telia.net...



"Neil W." <neilw (AT) REMOVEnetlib (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet
news:xrWpe.70827$NZ1.11840 (AT) fe09 (DOT) lga...
On Google my site is at or near the top on many of my target keywords.
Yet
on Yahoo it is not even in the top fifty. Obviously Yahoo is looking for
very different things than Google is. Any ideas as to what that is?
Thanks
for any tips.


It is probably also true that Google is looking for different things than
Altavista and Yahoo...


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...na-chiessi.php

i dont know if its coincodence but my site www.iosilver.co.uk is top for
silver jewellery on msn/altavista/yahoo and bottom of page 1 for google i
use the same process, meta keywords repeated no more than 6 times and
description containing ONLY your target phrase (no other banter)
h1,2,3 etc tags contain keyword

HTH
mark

You'll be big on Google for your on-page optimisation because of the
on-page optimisation but mostly because of your links. The OP will
have the ibl's but not the on-page, I'm guessing.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that watches the river flow...
--

On 9 Jun 2005 06:34:54 -0700, mspidc01 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote:

Niel,

I've noticed that my Google and Yahoo ranks seem to almost vary
inversely -- when one goes up the other seems to go down. I noticed
this in particular after we distributed a press release that was widely
picked up --- we had hundreds of incoming links for a while from folks
redistributing the content, and Yahoo loved it (ranks went way up),
while Google hated it (we disappeared from rankings). My guess at the
time was that Yahoo liked the links, but Google did not like the
duplicate content. When the press release was no longer carried on
folks's sites, our Yahoo ranks started dropping while Google began to
recover. Make sense?

Mark

What was in the press release? Where on the site did it link to? Main
page or internals?

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that watches the river flow...
--

On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:06:54 -0400, "Neil W." <neilw (AT) REMOVEnetlib (DOT) com>
wrote:

On Google my site is at or near the top on many of my target keywords. Yet
on Yahoo it is not even in the top fifty. Obviously Yahoo is looking for
very different things than Google is. Any ideas as to what that is? Thanks
for any tips.

(If responding by email remove REMOVE)

Probably you need more on-page optimisation.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that watches the river flow...
--

On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:34:21 +0200, Borek
<borek (AT) parts (DOT) bpp.to.com.remove.pl> wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:34:54 +0200, <mspidc01 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

this in particular after we distributed a press release that was widely
picked up --- we had hundreds of incoming links for a while from folks
redistributing the content, and Yahoo loved it (ranks went way up),
while Google hated it (we disappeared from rankings). My guess at the
time was that Yahoo liked the links, but Google did not like the
duplicate content. When the press release was no longer carried on

Perhaps you were penalized for fast increase in number of links?

Best,
Borek

Given the source they shouldn't have been, no-one would dare do press
releases.

BB

--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that watches the river flow...
--