![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is there any evidence that right navigation affects SERPs due to it being placed after the content in the markup? |
|
Also are there any usability issues with it, and ways round them? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is there any evidence that right navigation affects SERPs due to it being placed after the content in the markup? Also are there any usability issues with it, and ways round them? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:16:40 +0100, xyZed <xyzed (AT) xyzed (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Is there any evidence that right navigation affects SERPs due to it being placed after the content in the markup? Also are there any usability issues with it, and ways round them? Right navigation has nothing to do with the order in the markup. Visit chembuddy to see left navigation being put after content. Best, Borek |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
› I'd second that. If you build your site properly, the location of navigation › bars, menus and the like is not dependent upon the order in which they are › included in the markup. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
How do you do that? When I put my floated right nav column before the content in my markup, then the content only appears after the end of the nav column. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
TomekK <tomekk.nospam.delete__it (AT) amsnet (DOT) pl |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Spammers will eat amsnet.pl bandwidth trying to send something to you. Modify domain to impossible one - like amsnet.pl.dupa |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Spammers will eat amsnet.pl bandwidth trying to send something to you. Modify domain to impossible one - like amsnet.pl.dupa Dzieki ;-) TK |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
› The key to success is the Box Model. If you would use DIVs instead of › TABLEs to divide your layout parts you could do almost everything with › them applying accurate CSS positioning. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |