![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was just wondering if a few of you pros could could give me an idea of the most obvious do's and dont's for website design for SEO?? Or point me in the direction of a good website that can tell me... Thanks |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was just wondering if a few of you pros could could give me an idea of the most obvious do's and dont's for website design for SEO?? Or point me in the direction of a good website that can tell me... DO: |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:27:43 +0800, "Harps" darren (AT) netflowsystems (DOT) com> wrote: I was just wondering if a few of you pros could could give me an idea of the most obvious do's and dont's for website design for SEO?? Or point me in the direction of a good website that can tell me... Thanks I try. www.kruse.co.uk/ BB |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
dont hide keywords on your site (unless your site is massiveley relevant to the topic and i mean MASSIVELEY - like a market leader) dont keep submitting your site - its a waste of time |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
mark | r wrote: dont hide keywords on your site (unless your site is massiveley relevant to the topic and i mean MASSIVELEY - like a market leader) dont keep submitting your site - its a waste of time I'd like to know a bit more about this one myself. One of our competitors (centennial.co.uk) spam the hell out of the search engines, including tonnes of hidden keywords in all of their pages (take a look at their homepage, or any of their pages, in Firefox with Styles turned off and you'll see what I'm talking about). Now, we offer essentially the same solutions as Centennial, only much cheaper. So someone searching for "network auditing software" should be as interested in seeing our products in the results as centennial stuff - I don't see why they should have some get away free card for search engine spamming if we don't - regardless of their position in the market place. The end result? Centennial are now number 1 in the Google listings for a number of software products as a direct result of their search engine spamming (before they started spamming, they were down in the same place as we were). Up until this point I've had a bit too much moral fiber to drop myself down to their level - we've focused on providing good relevant content in things like knowledge base articles that still, after 6 months or so, have a page rank of 0 on google. Sure makes me wonder what kind of pages Google want people to write - if they reward people for spamming then that's exactly what they'll do. Maybe the advice you should be giving to the chap above is spam the hell out of all your keywords - that way you'll get a great ranking. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was just wondering if a few of you pros could could give me an idea of the most obvious do's and dont's for website design for SEO?? Or point me in the direction of a good website that can tell me... |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was just wondering if a few of you pros could could give me an idea of the most obvious do's and dont's for website design for SEO?? Or point me in the direction of a good website that can tell me... |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
mark | r wrote: dont hide keywords on your site (unless your site is massiveley relevant to the topic and i mean MASSIVELEY - like a market leader) dont keep submitting your site - its a waste of time I'd like to know a bit more about this one myself. One of our competitors (centennial.co.uk) spam the hell out of the search engines, including tonnes of hidden keywords in all of their pages (take a look at their homepage, or any of their pages, in Firefox with Styles turned off and you'll see what I'm talking about). Now, we offer essentially the same solutions as Centennial, only much cheaper. So someone searching for "network auditing software" should be as interested in seeing our products in the results as centennial stuff - I don't see why they should have some get away free card for search engine spamming if we don't - regardless of their position in the market place. The end result? Centennial are now number 1 in the Google listings for a number of software products as a direct result of their search engine spamming (before they started spamming, they were down in the same place as we were). Up until this point I've had a bit too much moral fiber to drop myself down to their level - we've focused on providing good relevant content in things like knowledge base articles that still, after 6 months or so, have a page rank of 0 on google. Sure makes me wonder what kind of pages Google want people to write - if they reward people for spamming then that's exactly what they'll do. Maybe the advice you should be giving to the chap above is spam the hell out of all your keywords - that way you'll get a great ranking. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
"James Crosswell" <james (AT) microforge (DOT) net> wrote in message news:425a97df$0$11711$8fcfb975 (AT) news (DOT) wanadoo.fr... mark | r wrote: dont hide keywords on your site (unless your site is massiveley relevant to the topic and i mean MASSIVELEY - like a market leader) dont keep submitting your site - its a waste of time I'd like to know a bit more about this one myself. One of our competitors (centennial.co.uk) spam the hell out of the search engines, including tonnes of hidden keywords in all of their pages (take a look at their homepage, or any of their pages, in Firefox with Styles turned off and you'll see what I'm talking about). Now, we offer essentially the same solutions as Centennial, only much cheaper. So someone searching for "network auditing software" should be as interested in seeing our products in the results as centennial stuff - I don't see why they should have some get away free card for search engine spamming if we don't - regardless of their position in the market place. The end result? Centennial are now number 1 in the Google listings for a number of software products as a direct result of their search engine spamming (before they started spamming, they were down in the same place as we were). Up until this point I've had a bit too much moral fiber to drop myself down to their level - we've focused on providing good relevant content in things like knowledge base articles that still, after 6 months or so, have a page rank of 0 on google. Sure makes me wonder what kind of pages Google want people to write - if they reward people for spamming then that's exactly what they'll do. Maybe the advice you should be giving to the chap above is spam the hell out of all your keywords - that way you'll get a great ranking. the technique im using is to run 2 domains, the first is the legitimate site with all standard seo stuff the second is a spam site that uses all of the grey techniques - its working well and for some reason the legit site is diong better than the spam site but if i delete the spam sites my legit site drops massiveley. Mark |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |