![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Will help a bit but not as much as links from sites outside your own. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:24:47 GMT, James Wong <james (AT) no-spam (DOT) com wrote: Hello, I'm thinking about creating a few doorway pages. All my competitors have doorway pages and I feel if I don't I will be "left in the dust" by my competitors. Has anybody's main site (not doorway page) been banned or penalized by having doorway pages? Has anybody's doorway pages been banned? If so, how does that affect your main site if any? James Wong Define doorway pages. BB |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:57:13 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:24:47 GMT, James Wong <james (AT) no-spam (DOT) com wrote: Hello, I'm thinking about creating a few doorway pages. All my competitors have doorway pages and I feel if I don't I will be "left in the dust" by my competitors. Has anybody's main site (not doorway page) been banned or penalized by having doorway pages? Has anybody's doorway pages been banned? If so, how does that affect your main site if any? James Wong Define doorway pages. BB I think more importantly, how does Google Define doorway pages?? - James |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 20 Jul 2004 02:48:51 -0700, friendlyware (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Vadim) wrote: Does it define what a doorway page is though? And could you not build something that falls outside the usual concept but effectively does the job? |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
The reason is exactly that it is difficult to distinguish between legitimate doorway, supported by site content, and pure spam. Only human may distinguish and it takes time. Considering how many pages they index they simply has no time to do it. The robots seem not so intellectual yet so errors are unavoidable. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |