![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Incidentally I've been reading that even 301s are not full-proof. I hear people are having problems with Yahoo. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've been told that "domain name aliasing," which would involve only one company (since theoretically I would do this with GoDaddy domain names and a GoDaddy hosting account), is something different form 301 and 302 and URL forwarding and all of that. Is aliasing just another name for something already mentioned and therefore something I'm already reading about under a different name, or is this something new? And if it's new, is it good or bad in SE terms? |
|
Incidentally I've been reading that even 301s are not full-proof. I hear people are having problems with Yahoo. "Aliasing" is not something I think we need at this point, but we happen to have domain-names just lying around and I'm curious. (We have no intention of screwing around with things when we're in the process of picking ourselves up and dusting ourselves off!) |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 1 Nov 2004 12:00:08 -0800, swervedrivers (AT) comcast (DOT) net (swervedrivers.com) wrote: Incidentally I've been reading that even 301s are not full-proof. I hear people are having problems with Yahoo. Yahoo ignores 301 redirects. Has for several months now. They will just show the old link/info until you give them a 404 error page for that URL. Google is rumored [and I stress the word "rumor"] to consider ignoring them also. Something about duplicate content thoughts. Carol |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"C.W." <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:418698ed.20219527 (AT) news (DOT) prodigy.net... On 1 Nov 2004 12:00:08 -0800, swervedrivers (AT) comcast (DOT) net (swervedrivers.com) wrote: Incidentally I've been reading that even 301s are not full-proof. I hear people are having problems with Yahoo. Yahoo ignores 301 redirects. Has for several months now. They will just show the old link/info until you give them a 404 error page for that URL. Google is rumored [and I stress the word "rumor"] to consider ignoring them also. Something about duplicate content thoughts. Carol how do you check for a 301? i have multiple domains pointing at a single slot of webspace is this 301? mark |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yahoo ignores 301 redirects. Has for several months now. They will just show the old link/info until you give them a 404 error page for that URL. Google is rumored [and I stress the word "rumor"] to consider ignoring them also. Something about duplicate content thoughts. Carol |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
It is different than a redirect. It is the same server using a different name. ServerName staceyssimplestuff.com ServerAlias www.staceyssimplestuff.com d22351.u23.hostunite.com |
|
I wouldn't. Just stick with things you know. What might be good with your linking is this. The swervedriver site can say it is a dedicated fan site directory etc. Your swervedriver.com listing your actorname.com sites, and your actorname.com sites having links to your mac pages(as this has your info on them) well most of the pictures, and also the other actorname.com sites. Make it easy to navigate to where a person doesn't have to go back to much, and everything can be accessible from your internal pages almost. This way, you don't have to have redirects and it might work out for you. I hope this makes some sense. Stacey |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
It is different than a redirect. It is the same server using a different name. ServerName staceyssimplestuff.com ServerAlias www.staceyssimplestuff.com d22351.u23.hostunite.com I wouldn't. Just stick with things you know. What might be good with your linking is this. The swervedriver site can say it is a dedicated fan site directory etc. Your swervedriver.com listing your actorname.com sites, and your actorname.com sites having links to your mac pages(as this has your info on them) well most of the pictures, and also the other actorname.com sites. Make it easy to navigate to where a person doesn't have to go back to much, and everything can be accessible from your internal pages almost. This way, you don't have to have redirects and it might work out for you. I hope this makes some sense. Stacey |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |