![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
| RE> "The best thing about DMOZ is that it forces webmasters to classify their site only one way. " The (ridiculous) requirement to choose one and only one identity hides important information. Understanding that limitation requires a little abstract thinking. But it becomes obvious, with a little logic and reflection. |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
But DMOZ does list individual pages of websites. So classifying one's site "only one way" isn't necessary after all. One of my sites has 7 different DMOZ listings (7 different pages), in 4 categories. But a single webpage can only go in one category. |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
Denise wrote: ... that she has some deep-linked references to individual pages |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
darnel wrote: Denise wrote: ... that she has some deep-linked references to individual pages The ODP prejudice against the shopping/informational divide remains. Many commercial sites (that have shopping carts, etc) seek to attract customers by providing excellent information. And if you try to reference those sites in an informational category, at ODP, you'll get your head chopped off. |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) com wrote: very little You been smokin those vegetables, haven't you |

#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Not to John. He's been here a while, latest in a long line of attention-seekers we can't get rid of. Not that there's much left of us anymore either. Yeah, it's slowly getting quiet here. One reason why I haven't unsubscribed from this group, I hate to turn off the light. |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
|
DMOZ? What is DMOZ? What is Google good for? |
|
If not answering this question? |
#28
| |||
| |||
|
|
johngohde (AT) naturalhealthperspective (DOT) comwrote : DMOZ? What is DMOZ? What is Google good for? ... well, you don`t really want to know. If not answering this question? I didn`t know Google was able to think on its own, let alone answer a question by itself. |
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 12 Dec 2006 20:08:07 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Not to John. He's been here a while, latest in a long line of attention-seekers we can't get rid of. Not that there's much left of us anymore either. Yeah, it's slowly getting quiet here. One reason why I haven't unsubscribed from this group, I hate to turn off the light. If I need anything you can do I'll be in touch. |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote: On 12 Dec 2006 20:08:07 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Not to John. He's been here a while, latest in a long line of attention-seekers we can't get rid of. Not that there's much left of us anymore either. Yeah, it's slowly getting quiet here. One reason why I haven't unsubscribed from this group, I hate to turn off the light. If I need anything you can do I'll be in touch. Thanks. BTW, the unsubscribing thing has most to do with that I want to use that time to extend my blog, especially since it looks like its going somewhere :-) |
)![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |