crystal-liaison.com now indexed at 11,400

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

BB
--
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/thoma...art/index.html kruse (AT) crystal-liaison (DOT) com
Gifty! Shiny! Arty! BB!

Big Bill wrote:

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

Are you realy going to give us an update every day?

What do we have to think of that?

It looks like spamming to me.

--
Webontwerp:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html

Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

I still have the impression that my new pages are not added to the index
as fast as it used to be (have to look into it though).

Number of visitors is growing like crazy (close to 10,000) though, but I
probably have to thank some zombies for that :-(


--
John Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
NEW ----> Textpad reference card (pdf): http://johnbokma.com/textpad/

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:42:36 +0100, tonnie <t.prasing (AT) chello (DOT) nl>
wrote:

Big Bill wrote:
When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

Are you realy going to give us an update every day?

If I feel like it. Several times if I wanna.

BB


--
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/thoma...art/index.html kruse (AT) crystal-liaison (DOT) com
Gifty! Shiny! Arty! BB!

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:47:45 +0100, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com>
wrote:

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

I still have the impression that my new pages are not added to the index
as fast as it used to be (have to look into it though).

Read my yesterday's comments - I feel like G does some
undersurface things. It is calm before the storm.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

Borek <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:47:45 +0100, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com
wrote:

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

I still have the impression that my new pages are not added to the
index as fast as it used to be (have to look into it though).

Read my yesterday's comments -

message ID / Subject ? I think I missed it

I feel like G does some
undersurface things. It is calm before the storm.

Me too, I mean, PageRank update should be happening in 5 more days?
The crawling looks the same to me (have to check again though), but the
updates to the index are not happening at normal pace, is my feeling.

--
John Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
NEW ----> Textpad reference card (pdf): http://johnbokma.com/textpad/

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:35:18 +0100, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com>
wrote:

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

I still have the impression that my new pages are not added to the
index as fast as it used to be (have to look into it though).

Read my yesterday's comments -

message ID / Subject ? I think I missed it

<op.s3njdnbn26l578@borek>

Me too, I mean, PageRank update should be happening in 5 more days?
The crawling looks the same to me (have to check again though), but the
updates to the index are not happening at normal pace, is my feeling.

Looks like we agree this time

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:15:45 +0100, Borek
<m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:47:45 +0100, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com
wrote:

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

I still have the impression that my new pages are not added to the index
as fast as it used to be (have to look into it though).

Read my yesterday's comments - I feel like G does some
undersurface things. It is calm before the storm.

Best,
Borek

Note my other post on the subject earlier today, even more wild
differences in the index. It isn't calm where I am.

BB
--
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/thoma...art/index.html kruse (AT) crystal-liaison (DOT) com
Gifty! Shiny! Arty! BB!

"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:15:45 +0100, Borek
m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:47:45 +0100, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com
wrote:

When I looked this morning there were a mere 25 mentions indexed and
most of those were on other sites. Up and down we go.

I still have the impression that my new pages are not added to the index
as fast as it used to be (have to look into it though).

Read my yesterday's comments - I feel like G does some
undersurface things. It is calm before the storm.

Best,
Borek

Note my other post on the subject earlier today, even more wild
differences in the index. It isn't calm where I am.

It is always wise to stay away from the seafoam.:-)

Stacey
--
Massage Therapy - http://massage-therapy-101.net
Valentine Gifts-
http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...-day-gifts.htm
Flowers- http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...ts-flowers.htm