![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a directory site and allow people to submit their sites to it, I give them a quick check over and if they are blatantly abusing the google guidelines I email them a link to the guidelines and tell them that is why I won't include them. This inevitably leads to them emailing back saying their site was done by a 3rd party and wanting to know what the 3rd party are doing which could cause problems. I usually tell them just to read the guidelines and discuss things with the SEO's. More and more often though they email me back wanting to know more. Would it be ethical to tell them the tricks the SEO's are pulling or should I just keep out of things? What would you do? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a directory site and allow people to submit their sites to it, I give them a quick check over and if they are blatantly abusing the google guidelines I email them a link to the guidelines and tell them that is why I won't include them. This inevitably leads to them emailing back saying their site was done by a 3rd party and wanting to know what the 3rd party are doing which could cause problems. I usually tell them just to read the guidelines and discuss things with the SEO's. More and more often though they email me back wanting to know more. Would it be ethical to tell them the tricks the SEO's are pulling or should I just keep out of things? What would you do? |
#4
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
|
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:21:56 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:dpm7ci$cvo$1 (AT) nwrdmz01 (DOT) dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com... I have a directory site and allow people to submit their sites to it, I give them a quick check over and if they are blatantly abusing the google guidelines I email them a link to the guidelines and tell them that is why I won't include them. This inevitably leads to them emailing back saying their site was done by a 3rd party and wanting to know what the 3rd party are doing which could cause problems. I usually tell them just to read the guidelines and discuss things with the SEO's. More and more often though they email me back wanting to know more. Would it be ethical to tell them the tricks the SEO's are pulling or should I just keep out of things? What would you do? Spill you guts for a price! :-) Actually, you are already helping them out enough for free. If they want more I see no reason that is unethical to tell them what is wrong. It is up to you. But you shouldn't be doing SEO for free to loads of strangers, So you're basically telling him to turn away potential customers? |
|
Especially a customer who is primed, and ready to listen to your sales pitch? I dont' understand |
|
why you would recommend he turn away perfectly qualified sales leads. Most people in the business world would call that insanity. This is a perfect opportunity for him to convert visitors to cash customers. He would be nuts *not* to do it, IMO. |
|
Would you withhold info to a potential rag rug customer because you thought they might go elsewhere to buy it? Or because it was "too much work" to get a sale? That doesnt make any business sense either, IMO. |
|
The only caveat I can see that TJ needs to be wary of, is: snip |
|
may not be the best for a long term SEO business, if SEO is where he wants to make his living. |
| just another 2 cents from the peanut gallery, |
#5
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:21:56 +0100, "Stacey" Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:dpm7ci$cvo$1 (AT) nwrdmz01 (DOT) dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com... I have a directory site and allow people to submit their sites to it, I give them a quick check over and if they are blatantly abusing the google guidelines I email them a link to the guidelines and tell them that is why I won't include them. This inevitably leads to them emailing back saying their site was done by a 3rd party and wanting to know what the 3rd party are doing which could cause problems. I usually tell them just to read the guidelines and discuss things with the SEO's. More and more often though they email me back wanting to know more. Would it be ethical to tell them the tricks the SEO's are pulling or should I just keep out of things? What would you do? Spill you guts for a price! :-) Actually, you are already helping them out enough for free. If they want more I see no reason that is unethical to tell them what is wrong. It is up to you. But you shouldn't be doing SEO for free to loads of strangers, So you're basically telling him to turn away potential customers? |
|
Especially a customer who is primed, and ready to listen to your sales pitch? |
|
I dont' understand why you would recommend he turn away perfectly qualified sales leads. |
|
Most people in the business world would call that insanity. |
|
This is a perfect opportunity for him to convert visitors to cash customers. He would be nuts *not* to do it, IMO. |
|
Would you withhold info to a potential rag rug customer because you thought they might go elsewhere to buy it? Or because it was "too much work" to get a sale? That doesnt make any business sense either, IMO. |
|
The only caveat I can see that TJ needs to be wary of, is: He better make sure his SEO chops will rank the site he has critiqued (or rejected from his directory) higher than they currently are. If he were to take that site on as a customer & and lower their current ranking, he might have some explaining to do and some SEO egg to remove. |
|
I suspect most website owners have little to no sense of whitehat vs. grayhat vs. blackhat and lowering their rank in the SERPS may not be the best for a long term SEO business, if SEO is where he wants to make his living. On the other side of that caveat, he could just as easily cherry pick submitted sites that have poor current SERPS and make himself look like quite the SEO whiz. Really it all just depends on the current rank of the site he is critiquing, how competitive the keywords are, and TJ's SEO skill level and confidence. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:51:43 GMT, Jill L. TotallyMunged (AT) TooManyUsenetEmai...ters (DOT) com> wrote: Spill you guts for a price! :-) Actually, you are already helping them out enough for free. If they want more I see no reason that is unethical to tell them what is wrong. It is up to you. But you shouldn't be doing SEO for free to loads of strangers, Stacy So you're basically telling him to turn away potential customers? Especially a customer who is primed, and ready to listen to your sales pitch? I dont' understand why you would recommend he turn away perfectly qualified sales leads. Most people in the business world would call that insanity. This is a perfect opportunity for him to convert visitors to cash customers. He would be nuts *not* to do it, IMO. Would you withhold info to a potential rag rug customer because you thought they might go elsewhere to buy it? Or because it was "too much work" to get a sale? That doesnt make any business sense either, IMO. The only caveat I can see that TJ needs to be wary of, is: He better make sure his SEO chops will rank the site he has critiqued (or rejected from his directory) higher than they currently are. If he were to take that site on as a customer & and lower their current ranking, he might have some explaining to do and some SEO egg to remove. I suspect most website owners have little to no sense of whitehat vs. grayhat vs. blackhat and lowering their rank in the SERPS may not be the best for a long term SEO business, if SEO is where he wants to make his living. On the other side of that caveat, he could just as easily cherry pick submitted sites that have poor current SERPS and make himself look like quite the SEO whiz. Really it all just depends on the current rank of the site he is critiquing, how competitive the keywords are, and TJ's SEO skill level and confidence. just another 2 cents from the peanut gallery, Jill Sorry Stacy, After re-reading my post, I think I misinterpreted your stance on this. I took your position to be that TJ should never provide information to potential customers until they were willing to pay him for it. What I should have replied instead would be: I think TJ *should* invest the his time to convert inquiries into customers... ...and he will likely have to do this "for free" to acquire them as clients. It's very unrealistic they are going to cough up cash to him at such an early stage when they are so "in the dark" about SEO and how it works. They will still need some basic SEO trouble shooting/diagnosis for them to make financial decisions. So I do disagree with you in that I think he will still have to do more "free" work with them to make a conversion. IMO, I consider that a good business decision on TJ's part, not a bad one. Once he converts them he should most certainly start charging them, I'm sure we agree there. Therefore, in my mind, TJ "doing SEO for free" as part of his email critiques, as you called it, is not the same as him "providing additional free basic SEO education about their sites". I see what he's doing as providing sales info, not giving away "free SEO advice". SEO is a pretty complicated and nebulous process. To give a few basic hints away for free makes sense, and is good business on TJ's part. These website owners are as close to "qualified sales leads" as you can get in the world of SEO-- why lose them right away by asking them to pay for basic information? Why not make them happy and give it to them? Especially if it's followed by an offer to fix their site? I think his idea of setting up a free directory and then critiquing the submissions is quite a brilliant way to get clients. Kudos to him if he chooses to follow through on it. again, just 2 cents on the dollar, as all opinions are. Jill |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
| Now you can try to convince John and Stacy that giving away 15 minutes of "free advice" is a worthwhile investment. ;o)~ It's just a part of the "cost of getting clients" who will then pay you well for hours and hours of SEO work. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jill L." <TotallyMunged (AT) TooManyUsenetEmailHarvesters (DOT) com> wrote in message news:sqdtr19mcq8qds3qib44ir58cstoms1ms2 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:51:43 GMT, Jill L. TotallyMunged (AT) TooManyUsenetEmai...ters (DOT) com> wrote: snip .. I did in the past but some of my techniques are real good and no one has thought of them yet |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 6 Jan 2006 18:48:39 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: snipped lots of points by John about how TJ should not give away basic "free" SEO advice to users of his directory, that I think makes business sense to give away Doing things for free (or discounts for that matter)? Yes, true insanity. It's very simple: you do work, how much is that worth? And are you good at it? Then ask more. Just to make my point about business websites being mainly about converting visitors into customers.... ( and we're not talking hobby sites here). ....why, exactly do you give away--- "for free", SEO tools (scripts and sample code), at your website? Don't you consider "Doing things for free" "true insanity"? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
"T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:dpm7ci$cvo$1 (AT) nwrdmz01 (DOT) dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com... I have a directory site and allow people to submit their sites to it, I give them a quick check over and if they are blatantly abusing the google guidelines I email them a link to the guidelines and tell them that is why I won't include them. This inevitably leads to them emailing back saying their site was done by a 3rd party and wanting to know what the 3rd party are doing which could cause problems. I usually tell them just to read the guidelines and discuss things with the SEO's. More and more often though they email me back wanting to know more. Would it be ethical to tell them the tricks the SEO's are pulling or should I just keep out of things? What would you do? Spill you guts for a price! :-) Actually, you are already helping them out enough for free. If they want more I see no reason that is unethical to tell them what is wrong. It is up to you. But you shouldn't be doing SEO for free to loads of strangers, helping them is good, but doing more is work(IMHO).:-) Stacey |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |