crit my seo

www.xrio.com/website

im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts

cheerz

mark

"mark r" <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

www.xrio.com/website

im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts

So you think your internal links are crap and not worth going to? Why would
you do that? PR reasons? I suppose you haven't heard the latest links that
are related count real nicely as weighted text on your pages. You need out
going links that are related to help your relevance also. The only things
you should nofollow are maybe affiliate links and sites that are unrelated
or not really needing the link per say.

Stacey
--
Jezsta Web Productions
SEO Tips - Website Design - Marketing
http://jezsta.com/

On Feb 1, 1:25 pm, "Jezsta Web Productions" <Please-use-our-contact-
f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"mark r" <markr... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:93e7de88-9c9f-4bf7-83a0-3b77689754fb (AT) s19g2000prg (DOT) googlegroups.com...

www.xrio.com/website

im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts

So you think your internal links are crap and not worth going to? Why would
you do that? PR reasons? I suppose you haven't heard the latest links that
are related count real nicely as weighted text on your pages. You need out
going links that are related to help your relevance also. The only things
you should nofollow are maybe affiliate links and sites that are unrelated
or not really needing the link per say.

Stacey
--
Jezsta Web Productions
SEO Tips - Website Design - Marketinghttp://jezsta.com/

hmm not heard the outbound thing...

my theory is that wikipedia does so good because internal links are so
focused on a keyword to page relationship with little 'fat' on the
site at all.

got any references to that outbound links thing?

mark

"mark r" <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

On Feb 1, 1:25 pm, "Jezsta Web Productions" <Please-use-our-contact-
f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:
"mark r" <markr... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:93e7de88-9c9f-4bf7-83a0-3b77689754fb (AT) s19g2000prg (DOT) googlegroups.com...

www.xrio.com/website

im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts

So you think your internal links are crap and not worth going to? Why
would
you do that? PR reasons? I suppose you haven't heard the latest links
that
are related count real nicely as weighted text on your pages. You need
out
going links that are related to help your relevance also. The only things
you should nofollow are maybe affiliate links and sites that are
unrelated
or not really needing the link per say.

hmm not heard the outbound thing...

Well I link my related sites back and forth, yep reciprocal cross linking
for some and have not seen any decreases for as rank goes only increasing.

Anytime you link with related sites it can only help your site's relevance
as you are point to other sites that are similar to yours.

my theory is that wikipedia does so good because internal links are so
focused on a keyword to page relationship with little 'fat' on the
site at all.

I think Wikipedia does so well cause they have a butt load of links pointing
to them. Good quality links that are using them as references to different
things. There internal linking structure is fortifying each page sort of
speak I think.

got any references to that outbound links thing?

Yeah.
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...d+for+websites

I also read it on Google's blog talking about linking and they said they
will reward linking that way. I can't find it now, but they said it.

I think too many people are concentrating too much on PR and not really
considering that everything will fall into place if you just link the way
you should. PR will come but trust and relevancy is more important than PR.

Stacey
--
Jezsta Web Productions
SEO Tips - Website Design - Marketing
http://jezsta.com/

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:06:06 -0800 (PST), mark r <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

On Feb 1, 1:25 pm, "Jezsta Web Productions" <Please-use-our-contact-
f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:
"mark r" <markr... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

news:93e7de88-9c9f-4bf7-83a0-3b77689754fb (AT) s19g2000prg (DOT) googlegroups.com...

www.xrio.com/website

im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts

So you think your internal links are crap and not worth going to? Why would
you do that? PR reasons? I suppose you haven't heard the latest links that
are related count real nicely as weighted text on your pages. You need out
going links that are related to help your relevance also. The only things
you should nofollow are maybe affiliate links and sites that are unrelated
or not really needing the link per say.

Stacey
--
Jezsta Web Productions
SEO Tips - Website Design - Marketinghttp://jezsta.com/

hmm not heard the outbound thing...

It's only about as old as time. If you link to likely useful sites for
your visitors, you make your own site a better resource.

my theory is that wikipedia does so good because internal links are so
focused on a keyword to page relationship with little 'fat' on the
site at all.

got any references to that outbound links thing?

I agree with it. Good enough or do I have to mention my kitchen again?

BB

--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:25:48 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"mark r" <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:93e7de88-9c9f-4bf7-83a0-3b77689754fb (AT) s19g2000prg (DOT) googlegroups.com...
www.xrio.com/website

im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts

So you think your internal links are crap and not worth going to? Why would
you do that? PR reasons? I suppose you haven't heard the latest links that
are related count real nicely as weighted text on your pages. You need out
going links that are related to help your relevance also. The only things
you should nofollow are maybe affiliate links and sites that are unrelated
or not really needing the link per say.

Stacey

What she said. There, that'll teach you to go defending poor, helpless
little me.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

On Feb 1, 10:14*am, "Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-
f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

Anytime you link with related sites it can only help your site's relevance
as you are point to other sites that are similar to yours.

"as you are" don't understand what you're talking about, eh jezsta?

http://searchengineland.com/071007-173841.php
http://searchengineland.com/071029-084449.php

"Anytime you link with related sites"
= you are asking visitors to LEAVE YOUR SITE.

"SEOwebMarket.com" <webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote

On Feb 1, 10:14 am, "Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-
f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

Anytime you link with related sites it can only help your site's
relevance
as you are point to other sites that are similar to yours.

"as you are" don't understand what you're talking about, eh jezsta?

http://searchengineland.com/071007-173841.php
http://searchengineland.com/071029-084449.php

<"Anytime you link with related sites"

= you are asking visitors to LEAVE YOUR SITE.

Oh, my goodness you again! Trust me you don't know. Those articles are about
selling PR and paid links has nothing to do with linking out.

Google rewards linking out to related sites and this can actually help a
page. Linking without worry about PR or anything is better for your sites!

BTW if you start you threatening and cussing emails again trust me I will
tell your hosting or anything I can have have you shut down.

Stacey
--
Jezsta Web Productions
SEO Tips - Website Design - Marketing
http://jezsta.com/

"SEOwebMarket.com" <webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote

On Feb 1, 10:14 am, "Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-
f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

Anytime you link with related sites it can only help your site's
relevance
as you are point to other sites that are similar to yours.

"as you are" don't understand what you're talking about, eh jezsta?

<meta name="robots" content="all">
<meta name="revisit-after" content="7 Days">
<meta name="expires" content="never">
<meta name="distribution" content="Global">
<meta name="rating" content="GENERAL">
<meta name="city" content="Minneapolis">
<meta name="state" content="Minnesota">
<meta name="country" content="United States (usa)">
<meta name="zipcode" content="55441">
<meta name="author" content="SEOwebMarket.com">
<meta name="copyright" content="Copyright &copy; One Small Business, LLC -
All rights reserved">

LOL! And you know what you are doing? I noticed that your sites' that you
have made have the home page not using the top level of the domain, you also
are not using good SEO because of that and even saying home instead of
something better like "Art Store" homepage is bad SEO.

So those websites you list there that you stated you have optimized them for
high rankings what are those rankings?

Also having your link on their website is a not good. Not unless you did
their site for free and got the link for it. A big banner is just to me in
bad taste. http://edm4.com/.

Your code has a lot of fluff and you are using a lot a lot of style that can
be moved to css, and you even have inline style that is even easier to place
on a CSS.
a:link {text-decoration: none; color: #000099;}
a:visited {text-decoration: none; color: #000066;}
a:hover {text-decoration: underline; color: #006600;}
a:active {text-decoration: none; color: #3366FF;}

So please don't try and tell someone they don't know what they are talking
about.

Stacey
--
Jezsta Web Productions
SEO Tips - Website Design - Marketing
http://jezsta.com/

On Feb 1, 7:39 pm, "Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-
f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

saying home instead of
something better like "Art Store" homepage is bad SEO.

It only has ONE homepage. I'd use adjectives if there were more than
one.

Your advice to spam keywords is "bad SEO".

So those websites you list there that you stated you have optimized them for
high rankings what are those rankings?

As if that were any of your business . . .

http://www.google.com/search?q=international+art+store

& FYI what you claim "I stated" is BS. Don't confuse your naive
assumptions with reality.

I designed and built ALL of those websites from scratch

Also having your link on their website is a not good. Not unless you did
their site for free and got the link for it. A big banner is just to me in
bad taste.

Your ad hominem attack is in "bad taste" and it's also very immature.
You're throwing rocks at a brick wall.

What if I DID design and build that website for free? What if they
specifically told me to add links as a 'thank you'?

NASA didn't mention "bad taste" when they found that website and gave
them a contract.

Get back under the bridge and mind your own business ;p