crit my seo

"Big Bill" <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote

<Snip>

Oh, I have all her dolls. ALL her dolls, heh-heh.

You got the new 2008? :-)

Stacey

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:34:08 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

Oh:-(, good luck BB. Hope all will be ok. I will be thinking about you. Let
us know when you are back and OK! How about dancing? There is nothing wrong
with being 40, wish I was there again.:-)

I'm 54!

I think they can be good for five-minute fame. Top ranks for extreme
long-tail for five minutes.

Yeah, I see a lot of people still using them. Thing is they use them too
much, and wordpress will terminate blogs now for high usage of them for
artificially link ranking purposes.

From high usage of what exactly? I don't know what you mean there. I
never heard yet of WP shutting blogs down for stuff.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:36:35 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"Big Bill" <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:k9fcq39h8h1ad1d5bh3i8dher7o7iogkil (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
Snip

Oh, I have all her dolls. ALL her dolls, heh-heh.

You got the new 2008? :-)

There's a 2008?????

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:16:48 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"Big Bill" <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:6hfcq3lifdrgl3phvhm6lls9p9rtip1p3m (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:21:16 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
use-our-email-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:
snip


Google opened a can of worms with the nofollow as it is now being used
improperly because it used as it was intended to do.

Er.. you went Stacey on me there.

Uh, yeah I did didn't I ? LOL.

It isn't used as it is suppose to be for some. How's that?

Stacey

Given the source, close enough! :-)

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

On Feb 3, 4:29*pm, Big Bill <b... (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:10:42 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
On Feb 3, 7:24*am, "Jezsta Web Productions" *wrote:

link "out" to other related and such articles.

YOU are the only one in this thread discussing OUTBOUND LINKS genius.

Well I had the impression they wre being discussed by other people
myself.

No. Just her & quite persistently too.

Original OP post:

"im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts "

NOFOLLOW
INTERNAL LINKS
JUICE FLOW

Her advice: "You need out going links
that are related to help your relevance also."

simply dumbfounding

I gave the OP a decent answer but nobody will ever find it in this
thread after her ongoing outgoing-link rants. What a waste of
communication tools by someone who should be intelligent enough and
familiar enough to know better.

There should be a question, various answers, and a discussion about
the difference in opinion (with relevant sources referenced) - rather
than a terroristic troll spamming her peer's information in a
vindictive tantrum because she has nothing better to do with her time.
Some people call it crapping where you eat.

simply dumbfounding

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:59:46 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
<webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote:

On Feb 3, 4:29*pm, Big Bill <b... (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:10:42 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
On Feb 3, 7:24*am, "Jezsta Web Productions" *wrote:

link "out" to other related and such articles.

YOU are the only one in this thread discussing OUTBOUND LINKS genius.

Well I had the impression they wre being discussed by other people
myself.

No. Just her & quite persistently too.

Original OP post:

"im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts "

NOFOLLOW
INTERNAL LINKS
JUICE FLOW

Her advice: "You need out going links
that are related to help your relevance also."

simply dumbfounding

I gave the OP a decent answer but nobody will ever find it in this
thread after her ongoing outgoing-link rants. What a waste of
communication tools by someone who should be intelligent enough and
familiar enough to know better.

There should be a question, various answers, and a discussion about
the difference in opinion (with relevant sources referenced) - rather
than a terroristic troll spamming her peer's information in a
vindictive tantrum because she has nothing better to do with her time.
Some people call it crapping where you eat.

simply dumbfounding

Were you ever diagnosed? Don't feel bothered by the question, we get
all kinds here. I'm wondering if your particular brand of
misperception has a name.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

On Feb 4, 4:36*pm, Big Bill <b... (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:59:46 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"



webm... (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote:
On Feb 3, 4:29*pm, Big Bill <b... (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:10:42 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
On Feb 3, 7:24*am, "Jezsta Web Productions" *wrote:

link "out" to other related and such articles.

YOU are the only one in this thread discussing OUTBOUND LINKS genius.

Well I had the impression they wre being discussed by other people
myself.

No. Just her & quite persistently too.

Original OP post:

"im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts "

NOFOLLOW
INTERNAL LINKS
JUICE FLOW

Her advice: "You need out going links
that are related to help your relevance also."

simply dumbfounding

I gave the OP a decent answer but nobody will ever find it in this
thread after her ongoing outgoing-link rants. What a waste of
communication tools by someone who should be intelligent enough and
familiar enough to know better.

There should be a question, various answers, and a discussion about
the difference in opinion (with relevant sources referenced) - rather
than a terroristic troll spamming her peer's information in a
vindictive tantrum because she has nothing better to do with her time.
Some people call it crapping where you eat.

simply dumbfounding

Were you ever diagnosed? Don't feel bothered by the question, we get
all kinds here. I'm wondering if your particular brand of
misperception has a name.

You mean the kind of misperception that makes a fool advise outgoing
links in a discussion about internal links - or the kind that makes a
fool like yourself decide to attack your peers and post insults about
people who are only interested in making your tiny little world of
usenet a better place.

I've seen the ad hominem attacks that you've posted too, so don't
pretend to be any more intelligent, informed, or ethical than the
beast in this thread throwing rocks over her silly vendetta.

Don't think that your juvenile insults are making jezsta's
dumbfounding advice to increase your ranks by linking to other sites
any more relevant to the OP's question. You're just like her: crap
where you eat and spit on anyone that comes near you. You should both
be ashamed of yourselves.

Why are you here anyway bill? Helping the OP out with his question?
Breaking the terms of service?

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal
rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;

post any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, copyright,
trade secret or other proprietary right of any party (the "Rights"),
unless you are the owner of the Rights or have the permission of the
owner to Post such Content;

post messages that promote disruptive commercial messages

restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying the Service;

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:22:13 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
<webmail (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote:

On Feb 4, 4:36*pm, Big Bill <b... (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:59:46 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"



webm... (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote:
On Feb 3, 4:29*pm, Big Bill <b... (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:10:42 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"
On Feb 3, 7:24*am, "Jezsta Web Productions" *wrote:

link "out" to other related and such articles.

YOU are the only one in this thread discussing OUTBOUND LINKS genius.

Well I had the impression they wre being discussed by other people
myself.

No. Just her & quite persistently too.

Original OP post:

"im trying for a more wiki style link structure and have nofollowed
loads of internal links to keep juce flow controlled.. anyone got any
thoughts "

NOFOLLOW
INTERNAL LINKS
JUICE FLOW

Her advice: "You need out going links
that are related to help your relevance also."

simply dumbfounding

I gave the OP a decent answer but nobody will ever find it in this
thread after her ongoing outgoing-link rants. What a waste of
communication tools by someone who should be intelligent enough and
familiar enough to know better.

There should be a question, various answers, and a discussion about
the difference in opinion (with relevant sources referenced) - rather
than a terroristic troll spamming her peer's information in a
vindictive tantrum because she has nothing better to do with her time.
Some people call it crapping where you eat.

simply dumbfounding

Were you ever diagnosed? Don't feel bothered by the question, we get
all kinds here. I'm wondering if your particular brand of
misperception has a name.

You mean the kind of misperception that makes a fool advise outgoing
links in a discussion about internal links - or the kind that makes a
fool like yourself decide to attack your peers and post insults about
people who are only interested in making your tiny little world of
usenet a better place.

I've seen the ad hominem attacks that you've posted too, so don't
pretend to be any more intelligent, informed, or ethical than the
beast in this thread throwing rocks over her silly vendetta.

Don't think that your juvenile insults are making jezsta's
dumbfounding advice to increase your ranks by linking to other sites
any more relevant to the OP's question. You're just like her: crap
where you eat and spit on anyone that comes near you. You should both
be ashamed of yourselves.

Why are you here anyway bill? Helping the OP out with his question?
Breaking the terms of service?

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal
rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;

post any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, copyright,
trade secret or other proprietary right of any party (the "Rights"),
unless you are the owner of the Rights or have the permission of the
owner to Post such Content;

post messages that promote disruptive commercial messages

restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying the Service;

And where's the relevance to what's happening of any of that?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

On Feb 5, 2:22*am, Big Bill <b... (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:22:13 -0800 (PST), "SEOwebMarket.com"

Why are you here anyway bill? Helping the OP out with his question?
Breaking the terms of service?

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal
rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;

post any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, copyright,
trade secret or other proprietary right of any party (the "Rights"),
unless you are the owner of the Rights or have the permission of the
owner to Post such Content;

post messages that promote disruptive commercial messages

restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying the Service;

And where's the relevance to what's happening of any of that?

Because obviously nobody wants YOU around if you don't have anything
productive (RELEVANT) to add to the conversation and are only
interested in harassing and verbally abusing your peers to appease
your "lover's" personal vendetta. It describes (both of) your behavior
perfectly in the Appropriate Conduct "NOT" section of the terms of
service agreement; you deserve each other.

Go tear the heads off of dolls in your own group:

alt.bill&jezsta-in-a-tree

On Feb 3, 5:23 am, "SEOwebMarket.com" <webm... (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com>
wrote:

On Feb 2, 7:12 pm, "Jezsta Web Productions" <use-our-email-

f... (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:
"SEOwebMarket.com" <webm... (AT) seowebmarket (DOT) com> wrote in message
Your ad hominem attack is in "bad taste" and it's also very immature.
You were . . . you came . . . You obviously
helps you.
You really need to read
your pages. . . . you need to
you need to get that out of your head
your site
you need to learn

you really are

Didn't get the hint eh?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

This thread is about the OP,
NOFOLLOW and "Juice Flow".

not to be confused with what jezsta needs:http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...ct+right+juice

It's obvious to ME that the OP (whom this thread is actually ABOUT) is
referencing the recent algorithm changes that have been being
discussed over the past months regarding NOFOLLOW and "Juice Flow".

jezsta's initial question "Why would you do that?" makes it pretty
obvious that she doesn't know what she's talking about. It's also
obvious that she shouldn't be trusted because she's bragging about
"reciprocal cross linking" (in a thread about INTERNAL linking) at a
time when EXTERNAL linking is under great speculation as the cause of
many sites that have dropped out of the SERPs even for their brand
names. jezsta's advice for the OP to link out to increase ranks is
absurd and dumbfounding.

I'm pretty sure the OP was talking about his OWN "seo" when HE titled
this thread. jezsta should go buy herself some dolls to take her
aggressions out on if she doesn't have anything productive to do with
her time (other than wasting ours). I know I have lots of work to do.

-------------------------------------------------

Wikipedia is an "authority site" + quality INTERNAL links + quality
INCOMING links (especially from the .edu domains) to a variety of
pages gives them awesome ranks. Wikipedia does NOT, however, link
"out" - and EVEN if they did, it would have been switched to NOFOLLOW
last month.

The way I see it: if you feel you need to "nofollow" internal links =
you probably shouldn't display those links in the first place -
because they'll distract your customers from what is important.

The fact that you are actually monitoring and controlling "link juice"
shows that you're already leaps beyond most webmasters; try looking at
it from a marketing point of view rather than SEO.

Yep thats what this post was about

thanks for bringing it back on topic