 | |
Creating Backlinks
Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
Creating Backlinks -
05-17-2008
, 04:54 PM
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I just bought a new domain for a site that I want to use for backlinks to my main site. My idea is to create approx. 100 pages at this new site and have a link on all 100 pages to my other (main) site for incoming backlinks for it. What would be the best way to go creating those 100 pages all in the main directory or having them in one single sub-directory or creating 100 sub-directories? What would give my main site the strongest backlinks? The 100 pages in main directory, single sub-directory, or 100 seperate sub-directories? Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it |
Creating all those pages would be a waste of your time. Backlinks have
to be from real activities you are doing to help people by giving out
real information of value. eg articles.
The search engines would totally disregard your efforts as your
inbound links have to be from top quality sites.
All the best
David Ashton
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I just bought a new domain for a site that I want to use for backlinks to my main site. My idea is to create approx. 100 pages at this new site and have a link on all 100 pages to my other (main) site for incoming backlinks for it. |
since, oh, a couple of years later.
The idea of 'one page, one seo vote' has been so discreditied by spammers,
that the SEs have had be much more sophisticated in deciding what votes
'count' - and what you suggest simply clutters up the web, does no good to
anybody, and is much more likely to have your site banned than to succeed in
cheating the search engines.
If you want better results, first build a better site ... then look for
Quality Links.
That'll work!
--
Andrew
seo2seo.com
sick-site-syndrome.com
UK Residents:
STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff"
Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the
very poorest tell your friends about this petition:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/10penceband/
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
George Orwell <nob... (AT) mixmaster (DOT) it> wrote: I just bought a new domain for a site that I want to use for backlinks to my main site. My idea is to create approx. 100 pages at this new site and have a link on all 100 pages to my other (main) site for incoming backlinks for it. This form of web spam has been used since about 2002,and a waste of space since, oh, a couple of years later. The idea of 'one page, one seo vote' has been so discreditied by spammers, that the SEs have had be much more sophisticated in deciding what votes 'count' - and what you suggest simply clutters up the web, does no good to anybody, and is much more likely to have your site banned than to succeed in cheating the search engines. If you want better results, first build a better site ... then look for Quality Links. That'll work! -- Andrew seo2seo.com sick-site-syndrome.com UK Residents: STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff" Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the very poorest tell your friends about this petition:http://petitions.pm.gov..uk/10penceband/ |
making it the best resource possible to give the links weight. It also
helps if the site is less salesy and more factual (like wikipedia) as
people may give your new site links if the contents good enough with
will translate into a better quality of link.
Its not a fire and forget solution.
Mark
www.neue.co.uk
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On May 19, 5:10*pm, "Andrew Heenan" <andr... (AT) heenan (DOT) net> wrote: George Orwell <nob... (AT) mixmaster (DOT) it> wrote: I just bought a new domain for a site that I want to use for backlinks to my main site. My idea is to create approx. 100 pages at this new site and have a link on all 100 pages to my other (main) site for incoming backlinks for it. This form of web spam has been used since about 2002,and a waste of space since, oh, a couple of years later. The idea of 'one page, one seo vote' has been so discreditied by spammers, that the SEs have had be much more sophisticated in deciding what votes 'count' - and what you suggest simply clutters up the web, does no good to anybody, and is much more likely to have your site banned than to succeed in cheating the search engines. If you want better results, first build a better site ... then look for Quality Links. That'll work! -- Andrew seo2seo.com sick-site-syndrome.com UK Residents: STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff" Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the very poorest tell your friends about this petition:http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/10penceband/ What ppl are saying is that you need to pay attention to the new site, making it the best resource possible to give the links weight. It also helps if the site is less salesy and more factual (like wikipedia) as people may give your new site links if the contents good enough with will translate into a better quality of link. Its not a fire and forget solution. Markwww.neue.co.uk- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
linking back to your site would never happen naturally. Try creating
fewer pages with good and valuable content and work your links into
the content of some of the pages. Make it look natural. Use the
keywords your are targeting in the visible text of the link. Do like
one of the other people suggested, make this site a resource for
others so they will want to link to it. Just as you want inbound
links to your main site, in order for the links from this new site to
carry any weight, it too must have quality inbound links.
Shea
Strategic Internet LLC
http://www.strategic-internet.com
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On May 20, 1:08*pm, mark r <markr... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: On May 19, 5:10*pm, "Andrew Heenan" <andr... (AT) heenan (DOT) net> wrote: George Orwell <nob... (AT) mixmaster (DOT) it> wrote: I just bought a new domain for a site that I want to use for backlinks to my main site. My idea is to create approx. 100 pages at this new site and have a link on all 100 pages to my other (main) site for incoming backlinks for it. This form of web spam has been used since about 2002,and a waste of space since, oh, a couple of years later. The idea of 'one page, one seo vote' has been so discreditied by spammers, that the SEs have had be much more sophisticated in deciding what votes 'count' - and what you suggest simply clutters up the web, does no good to anybody, and is much more likely to have your site banned than to succeed in cheating the search engines. If you want better results, first build a better site ... then look for Quality Links. That'll work! -- Andrew seo2seo.com sick-site-syndrome.com UK Residents: STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff" Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the very poorest tell your friends about this petition:http://petitions.pm..gov.uk/10penceband/ What ppl are saying is that you need to pay attention to the new site, making it the best resource possible to give the links weight. It also helps if the site is less salesy and more factual (like wikipedia) as people may give your new site links if the contents good enough with will translate into a better quality of link. Its not a fire and forget solution. Markwww.neue.co.uk-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The search engines are looking for natural linking and 100 pages all linking back to your site would never happen naturally. *Try creating fewer pages with good and valuable content and work your links into the content of some of the pages. *Make it look natural. *Use the keywords your are targeting in the visible text of the link. *Do like one of the other people suggested, make this site a resource for others so they will want to link to it. *Just as you want inbound links to your main site, in order for the links from this new site to carry any weight, it too must have quality inbound links. Shea Strategic Internet LLChttp://www.strategic-internet.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
sure the sites are on different servers. I remember reading somewhere
that google checks to see if backlinks are on the same server, and if
so it most likely ignores them.
Good luck,
Shane
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On May 20, 1:08 pm, mark r <markr... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: On May 19, 5:10 pm, "Andrew Heenan" <andr... (AT) heenan (DOT) net> wrote: George Orwell <nob... (AT) mixmaster (DOT) it> wrote: I just bought a new domain for a site that I want to use for backlinks to my main site. My idea is to create approx. 100 pages at this new site and have a link on all 100 pages to my other (main) site for incoming backlinks for it. This form of web spam has been used since about 2002,and a waste of space since, oh, a couple of years later. The idea of 'one page, one seo vote' has been so discreditied by spammers, that the SEs have had be much more sophisticated in deciding what votes 'count' - and what you suggest simply clutters up the web, does no good to anybody, and is much more likely to have your site banned than to succeed in cheating the search engines. If you want better results, first build a better site ... then look for Quality Links. That'll work! -- Andrew seo2seo.com sick-site-syndrome.com UK Residents: STOP THE "10p Tax Ripoff" Sign the petition to stop the government stealing from the very poorest tell your friends about this petition:http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/10penceband/ What ppl are saying is that you need to pay attention to the new site, making it the best resource possible to give the links weight. It also helps if the site is less salesy and more factual (like wikipedia) as people may give your new site links if the contents good enough with will translate into a better quality of link. Its not a fire and forget solution. Markwww.neue.co.uk-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The search engines are looking for natural linking and 100 pages all linking back to your site would never happen naturally. Try creating fewer pages with good and valuable content and work your links into the content of some of the pages. Make it look natural. Use the keywords your are targeting in the visible text of the link. Do like one of the other people suggested, make this site a resource for others so they will want to link to it. Just as you want inbound links to your main site, in order for the links from this new site to carry any weight, it too must have quality inbound links. Shea Strategic Internet LLChttp://www.strategic-internet.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I advise against this too. But if you do decide to do it, make sure the sites are on different servers. I remember reading somewhere that google checks to see if backlinks are on the same server, and if so it most likely ignores them. |
own server won't count? Great!
+mrcakey
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
I just bought a new domain for a site that I want to use for backlinks to my main site. My idea is to create approx. 100 pages at this new site and have a link on all 100 pages to my other (main) site for incoming backlinks for it. What would be the best way to go creating those 100 pages all in the main directory or having them in one single sub-directory or creating 100 sub-directories? What would give my main site the strongest backlinks? The 100 pages in main directory, single sub-directory, or 100 seperate sub-directories? Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Your site reports there is a problem with its security certificate. I would get that fixed before you do anything else. The important thing about back links is the text contained in the anchor "<a> </a>". Make it meaningful and with useful keywords. a>Click here</a> is useless. |
be told what to do. So, "Click here - call to action - key phrase" is
likely to have much more effect in gaining conversions than would "key
phrase". That should be born in mind.
Quote:
|
Instead write" if you want to buy <a>Model of the Ford Escort 500</a>" (or what ever). |
Escort 500</a>"
or maybe be even more concise and just have a link set on its own a
little <a>Buy the Ford Escort 500</a> in larger font, too, maybe. Make
it stand out, be eye-catching.
BB
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.