The CPanel botched 509 error Googlefuck

http://www.google.com/search?q=%2250...e=off&filter=0

If you check, most of these sites are online now. All of the first
10 listed sites were working when I checked a few minutes ago. However,
they all were blown out Google due to a moronic bug in CPanel. Cpanel
returns in the HTTP headers are 200 error instead of a 509 error. Which
means that the server is telling Google all is fine, and this site is
one of thousands that voluntarily changed their home page to "509
Bandwidth Limit Exceeded." Which is exactly how Google is indexing these
sites. Eventually Google will respider them, and their actual content
will get in. However, until then they are Googlefucked and nobody will
find them in that search engine, thanks to CPanel.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.
Yet another murder by someone on Coricidin:
http://www.coricidin.org/kansas-coricidin-murder.htm

Brothermark wrote:

tut tut.

This is USENET. The owner Fluffy the Cat has been known to revoke
posting privs of people who don't use an adequate amount of profanity.
Besides, considering today Usenet is 99+% pornography, and various
other intellectual property thefts, do you really think the crowd here
is that moral?
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.
Yet another murder by someone on Coricidin:
http://www.coricidin.org/kansas-coricidin-murder.htm

"rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" <rfgdxm (AT) KILLSPAMMERSmochamail (DOT) com> wrote in
message news:3f80aed8$0$161$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) puce.readfreenews.net...

do you really think the crowd here
is that moral?

Speak for yourself Mr G!!
--
Charles Sweeney
www.CharlesSweeney.com

The current trend nationally and in California is to elect vicious idiots to
high office. Does that make idiocy a good thing?


"rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" <rfgdxm (AT) KILLSPAMMERSmochamail (DOT) com> wrote in
message news:3f80aed8$0$161$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) puce.readfreenews.net...

Brothermark wrote:
tut tut.

This is USENET. The owner Fluffy the Cat has been known to revoke
posting privs of people who don't use an adequate amount of profanity.
Besides, considering today Usenet is 99+% pornography, and various
other intellectual property thefts, do you really think the crowd here
is that moral?
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.
Yet another murder by someone on Coricidin:
http://www.coricidin.org/kansas-coricidin-murder.htm

This is USENET.

It's what we make it

peace out
mark

Brothermark wrote:

This is USENET.

It's what we make it

Hmm...we've made it a massive wonderland of porn and warez. Could be
worse.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.
Yet another murder by someone on Coricidin:
http://www.coricidin.org/kansas-coricidin-murder.htm

This is USENET.

It's what we make it

Hmm...we've made it a massive wonderland of porn and warez. Could be
worse.

It could be lots lots worse.
Currently I'd say maybe less than 1% of usenet are responsible for its poor
reputation.
Most people you meet are decent folk..... of course it depends where you
hang out

mark

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 02:13:49 +0100, Brothermark <yonnermark (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

This is USENET.

It's what we make it

Hmm...we've made it a massive wonderland of porn and warez. Could be
worse.

It could be lots lots worse.
Currently I'd say maybe less than 1% of usenet are responsible for its
poor
reputation.
Most people you meet are decent folk..... of course it depends where you
hang out

You *must* be frequenting all the wrong places...

Grey

--
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the
pitfall corollory that nothing is ridiculous.
- http://www.greywyvern.com - ORCA - Camouflaged PHP Web Scripts.

GreyWyvern wrote:

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 02:13:49 +0100, Brothermark
yonnermark (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:


This is USENET.

It's what we make it

Hmm...we've made it a massive wonderland of porn and warez.
Could be worse.

It could be lots lots worse.
Currently I'd say maybe less than 1% of usenet are responsible for
its poor
reputation.
Most people you meet are decent folk..... of course it depends where
you hang out

You *must* be frequenting all the wrong places...

Are you implying that this is the wrong place.

--
Duende

rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:

http://www.google.com/search?q=%2250...e=off&filter=0

If you check, most of these sites are online now. All of the first
10 listed sites were working when I checked a few minutes ago.

I won't check them if their bandwidth allocation is somewhat limited - it
just adds to their problems.

However, they all were blown out Google due to a moronic bug in
CPanel. Cpanel returns in the HTTP headers are 200 error instead of a
509 error. Which means that the server is telling Google all is fine,
and this site is one of thousands that voluntarily changed their home
page to "509 Bandwidth Limit Exceeded." Which is exactly how Google
is indexing these sites. Eventually Google will respider them, and
their actual content will get in. However, until then they are
Googlefucked and nobody will find them in that search engine, thanks
to CPanel.

somebody remind me again why people use cPanel for business sites.

presumably, these domains could define and configure their own 509 page.

--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com