![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. |

|
As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. Is this permitted? If not how can I contact Google for them to take action. I find this behaviour pathetic. Thanks |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 6 May 2006 09:09:11 -0700, christian9997 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: Hi A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. Is this permitted? If not how can I contact Google for them to take action. I find this behaviour pathetic. Thanks Hi Techinally, they could be seen as different sites, so I guess they are within the rules. But, are they duplicate sites ? Is so, report them for that instead. I guess only google knows the answers. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. Is this permitted? If not how can I contact Google for them to take action. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
christian9997 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. Is this permitted? If not how can I contact Google for them to take action. To answer my own question ;-) I've checked the Adwords policy and from what I understand, one company can only have one Adwords account, meaning they are cheating. I've contacted Google and I'll see what happens. To answer Borek: It just doesn't make sense for a company to be able to use several Adwords slots, that means a rich company like Microsoft could for example buy all the slots for the word "Software". I don't have the funds to overbid them. To answer Paul: They aren't duplicate sites they use a redirect. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 6 May 2006 10:03:15 -0700, christian9997 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: christian9997 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. Is this permitted? If not how can I contact Google for them to take action. To answer my own question ;-) I've checked the Adwords policy and from what I understand, one company can only have one Adwords account, meaning they are cheating. I've contacted Google and I'll see what happens. To answer Borek: It just doesn't make sense for a company to be able to use several Adwords slots, that means a rich company like Microsoft could for example buy all the slots for the word "Software". I don't have the funds to overbid them. To answer Paul: They aren't duplicate sites they use a redirect. Then, to me, that would cheating, and if I were running adwords, then they would be banned. I guess google would as well. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
christian9997 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. Is this permitted? If not how can I contact Google for them to take action. To answer my own question ;-) I've checked the Adwords policy and from what I understand, one company can only have one Adwords account, meaning they are cheating. I've contacted Google and I'll see what happens. To answer Borek: It just doesn't make sense for a company to be able to use several Adwords slots, that means a rich company like Microsoft could for example buy all the slots for the word "Software". I don't have the funds to overbid them. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 6 May 2006 09:09:11 -0700, christian9997 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: Hi A company is using different domain names to monopolise the Adwords positions for given words. They've got the name of their company ending with .com the name of their company ending with .ch (Switzerland domain name) and an alias that's the name of the service they are offering. As they are taking up 3 slots instead of 1 they are preventing other companies from having a chance to appear. Is this permitted? If not how can I contact Google for them to take action. I find this behaviour pathetic. Thanks Hi Techinally, they could be seen as different sites, so I guess they are within the rules. But, are they duplicate sites ? Is so, report them for that instead. I guess only google knows the answers. plh Paul |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |