![]() | |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet news:7mhfr1l0t4hr206er717bdq7nsq2ehr7cp (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 12:38:22 +0100, Borek m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:43:40 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. Look at Luigi's page ![]() Ah - ONE site - and thats his own ........... hardly counts does it. It was discussed several months ago. He believes he looks more serious thanks to that final s in protocol and trying to convince him that's not necesarilly a case is a waste of time. So, why are you still discussing about that? Each to their own. But if it was really so good to have it that way, then there would be more sites like it. May be he will wake up one day and change it to http like everyone else. Or may-be that noone will use http any more.... |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> skrev i meddelandet news p.s2o6l80m26l578 (AT) borek (DOT) ..On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:43:40 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. Look at Luigi's page ![]() It was discussed several months ago. He believes he looks more serious thanks to that final s in protocol and trying to convince him that's not necesarilly a case is a waste of time. Best, Borek Perhaps phishing is not a problem in your country. Lucky you! |

#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 20:41:07 +0100, Nico Schuyt <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: I think that it is better this kind of confusion you are talking about. Perhaps there are less people in Holland who know about phishing. Here there are not so many but still perhaps more than down there. What's the risc of phishing on those static web pages? SSL on the pages where information is submitted by the visitor will do. It is hopeless. Best, Borek |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Nico Schuyt" Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: Do you know any website where it is possible to check up the keyword density for websites using a https protocoll? Try http://www.gorank.com/analyze.php By the way, why do you use ssl for your whole site?? For many reasons, for example to let users understand whether they are really on that site or another... (against phishing) http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/p/phishing.html for example because it is much simpler for me to build it this way rather than to use http for some pages and https for others, for example because as user I had rather visit websites which have all the pages sent over https. Very unusual. It might even be confusing for your visitors who expect a 'normal' url like 'http://' |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:23:33 GMT, "Luigi Donatello Asero" jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote: "Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> skrev i meddelandet news p.s2o6l80m26l578 (AT) borek (DOT) ..On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:43:40 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. Look at Luigi's page ![]() It was discussed several months ago. He believes he looks more serious thanks to that final s in protocol and trying to convince him that's not necesarilly a case is a waste of time. Best, Borek Perhaps phishing is not a problem in your country. Lucky you! I have just had a quick look at your site. You have no worries about anyone wanting to phish your site ![]() Why would they ? plh Paul |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
I think that it is better this kind of confusion you are talking about. Perhaps there are less people in Holland who know about phishing. |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 12:24:18 +0100, "Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Nico Schuyt" Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: Do you know any website where it is possible to check up the keyword density for websites using a https protocoll? Try http://www.gorank.com/analyze.php By the way, why do you use ssl for your whole site?? For many reasons, for example to let users understand whether they are really on that site or another... (against phishing) http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/p/phishing.html for example because it is much simpler for me to build it this way rather than to use http for some pages and https for others, for example because as user I had rather visit websites which have all the pages sent over https. Very unusual. It might even be confusing for your visitors who expect a 'normal' url like 'http://' I have declined a link exchange because the links page was a https address. I could understand if the worry of phishing if the site was a bank or something. But anyone stupid enough to fall for the email scams deserve to be ripped off. ............ reminds me of the old adage of a fool and his money....... plh paul |
#28
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote: I think that it is better this kind of confusion you are talking about. Perhaps there are less people in Holland who know about phishing. Someone who clicks on a link and goes to a site pretending to be yours probably doesn't notice this (that's the whole point of phishing) Hence, it doesn't matter if you use https, or put big graphics on your site "This is the real thing". Plenty of users have no clue what https is anyway, only that they have to click the fricking Yes button when a certificate is expired. -- John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/ |
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet news:Xns973E93877C020castleamber (AT) 130 (DOT) 133.1.4... "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote: I think that it is better this kind of confusion you are talking about. Perhaps there are less people in Holland who know about phishing. Someone who clicks on a link and goes to a site pretending to be yours probably doesn't notice this (that's the whole point of phishing) Hence, it doesn't matter if you use https, or put big graphics on your site "This is the real thing". Plenty of users have no clue what https is anyway, only that they have to click the fricking Yes button when a certificate is expired. -- John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/ How many phishing sites do you know which use https? |

#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet news:3begr1da6gsteper9qkqhcj4c7tniggmnn (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:23:33 GMT, "Luigi Donatello Asero" jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote: "Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> skrev i meddelandet news p.s2o6l80m26l578 (AT) borek (DOT) ..On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:43:40 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. Look at Luigi's page ![]() It was discussed several months ago. He believes he looks more serious thanks to that final s in protocol and trying to convince him that's not necesarilly a case is a waste of time. Best, Borek Perhaps phishing is not a problem in your country. Lucky you! I have just had a quick look at your site. You have no worries about anyone wanting to phish your site ![]() Why would they ? plh Paul Fine. In this case you might have not read about the problems with Google´s old cache I have already written about. Please, explain to me why this cache has not been updated. I have not had this domain www.italymap.dk for a long time. Please have a look here http://www.google.se/search?q=semest...&start=40&sa=N www.italymap.dk/sv/alghero.html which still has the title "Scaiecat Spa Gigi-Hyresförmedling av flera semesterbostäder som ..." on Google And this page has been redirected to another site. I am neither the owner of the former nor the latter.. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |