![]() | |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. |

#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:43:40 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. Look at Luigi's page ![]() |
|
It was discussed several months ago. He believes he looks more serious thanks to that final s in protocol and trying to convince him that's not necesarilly a case is a waste of time. |
|
Best, Borek |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 03:21:35 GMT, "Luigi Donatello Asero" jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Nico Schuyt" Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: Do you know any website where it is possible to check up the keyword density for websites using a https protocoll? Try http://www.gorank.com/analyze.php By the way, why do you use ssl for your whole site?? For many reasons, for example to let users understand whether they are really on that site or another... (against phishing) http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/p/phishing.html for example because it is much simpler for me to build it this way rather than to use http for some pages and https for others, for example because as user I had rather visit websites which have all the pages sent over https. Very unusual. It might even be confusing for your visitors who expect a 'normal' url like 'http://' |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> skrev i meddelandet news:43b704db$0$99372$dbd41001 (AT) news (DOT) euronet.nl... Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: Do you know any website where it is possible to check up the keyword density for websites using a https protocoll? Try http://www.gorank.com/analyze.php It works Fine:-) But you really should have a look at the images. A lot of them are ver bad optimized, i.g. the https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/bi...sida/12-31.jpg (IIRC I mentioned it before :-) |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:43:40 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. Look at Luigi's page ![]() It was discussed several months ago. He believes he looks more serious thanks to that final s in protocol and trying to convince him that's not necesarilly a case is a waste of time. Best, Borek |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 12:38:22 +0100, Borek m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:43:40 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com wrote: As user I prefer to to visit websites which have all the pages sent over https Name some ? I've *never* seen a site that is totally https. Look at Luigi's page ![]() Ah - ONE site - and thats his own ........... hardly counts does it. It was discussed several months ago. He believes he looks more serious thanks to that final s in protocol and trying to convince him that's not necesarilly a case is a waste of time. |
|
Each to their own. But if it was really so good to have it that way, then there would be more sites like it. May be he will wake up one day and change it to http like everyone else. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Nico Schuyt" Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Nico Schuyt" Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com By the way, why do you use ssl for your whole site?? For many reasons, for example to let users understand whether they are really on that site or another... (against phishing) http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/p/phishing.html for example because it is much simpler for me to build it this way rather than to use http for some pages and https for others, for example because as user I had rather visit websites which have all the pages sent over https. Very unusual. It might even be confusing for your visitors who expect a 'normal' url like 'http://' I think that it is better this kind of confusion you are talking about. Perhaps there are less people in Holland who know about phishing. Here there are not so many but still perhaps more than down there. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Nico Schuyt" Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Nico Schuyt" Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com By the way, why do you use ssl for your whole site?? For many reasons, for example to let users understand whether they are really on that site or another... (against phishing) http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/p/phishing.html for example because it is much simpler for me to build it this way rather than to use http for some pages and https for others, for example because as user I had rather visit websites which have all the pages sent over https. Very unusual. It might even be confusing for your visitors who expect a 'normal' url like 'http://' I think that it is better this kind of confusion you are talking about. Perhaps there are less people in Holland who know about phishing. Here there are not so many but still perhaps more than down there. What's the risc of phishing on those static web pages? SSL on the pages where information is submitted by the visitor will do. |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
I think that it is better this kind of confusion you are talking about. Perhaps there are less people in Holland who know about phishing. Here there are not so many but still perhaps more than down there. What's the risc of phishing on those static web pages? SSL on the pages where information is submitted by the visitor will do. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |