Can some one give me a tip.... (re Google rank)

Hello.

I have now got my webpage www.ebitmanagement.se listed in all major
searchengines, listed in dmoz and variuos catalogues on the internet.
(so the number of inkoming links is building up)

But i still have parge-rank 0 on the site.

Can someone give "easy" and "understandable" tips of how to proceed to
start to increase the rank on goole ?

Thanks from sweden // Timo Söderlund

ts (AT) ebitmanagement (DOT) se wrote:

Hello.

I have now got my webpage www.ebitmanagement.se listed in all major
searchengines, listed in dmoz and variuos catalogues on the internet.
(so the number of inkoming links is building up)

But i still have parge-rank 0 on the site.

Can someone give "easy" and "understandable" tips of how to proceed to
start to increase the rank on goole ?

Thanks from sweden // Timo Söderlund

Did you try going door-to-door to all the local merchants to see if
they have a web site that can provide a link to your web page.
Door-to-door PR begging is a popular green bar boosting technique in
some other countries.

That was a joke. Pardon me. Actually, don't waste your swede self on
such nonsense as PR. PR has little to do with web page rankings in the
natural results pages. PR0 can be just as strong a competitor as a PR10
for the same keyphrase search, I think.

--
ethical SEO expert
http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/

<ts (AT) ebitmanagement (DOT) se> wrote


Hi Timo,

I have now got my webpage www.ebitmanagement.se listed in all major
searchengines, listed in dmoz and various catalogues on the internet.
(so the number of inkoming links is building up)

Which is good as you need links to make it in the internet. This is why the
internet is built on links. The bots love to bounce around from site to site
link to link. Without a link you can not be found. Without links your site
will be doomed to fail as you won't make the higher rankings. You will end
up having a couple of links from this group and mirrors so it will help
slightly but not as good as related trustworthy sites.

But i still have parge-rank 0 on the site.

Well your site seems to be relatively new.so it will take awhile for it to
show on the Google toolbar. Even Yahoo is only showing 17 links so that
isn't many. And 10 of them are from your own site stating the same title.
Which is never good. You need a different title on those. Yeah, mix them up
with what the page is about. the About Page's title can be About EBIT
Management. But change them. Try to put a different description in them. And
pop about 6 different keywords on this page(I say this for just because it
don't hurt and you never know)

Can someone give "easy" and "understandable" tips of how to proceed to
start to increase the rank on goole ?

Try these things and just wait, Remember Rome wasn't built in a day. While
waiting keep adding some content enticing the bots to keep coming back, and
try to gain some trustworthy related links. Your site is new and it takes
time to get your site really known with your footprints.

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

On 6 Aug 2006 12:54:52 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

PR0 can be just as strong a competitor as a PR10
for the same keyphrase search, I think.

Disagree here. Your statement is too general.
Yes,I have had PR2 pages outrank PR5 and PR6 but a PR0 outranking PR10
for the same terms ? Doubtful.

Yes, a PR10 site could mention the word Bollocks somewhere in the text
and you could have a PR0 optimized for that and outrank it, but that
is not the same as a PR10 optimized for Bollocks and a PR0 optimized
for Bollocks. PR10 will win hands down IMO.

And you can only go by looking at the toolbar PR which is out of date
the moment it is released.

plh
Paul

--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Paul wrote:

On 6 Aug 2006 12:54:52 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com
wrote:

PR0 can be just as strong a competitor as a PR10
for the same keyphrase search, I think.

Disagree here. Your statement is too general.
Yes,I have had PR2 pages outrank PR5 and PR6 but a PR0 outranking PR10
for the same terms ? Doubtful.

Yes, a PR10 site could mention the word Bollocks somewhere in the text
and you could have a PR0 optimized for that and outrank it, but that
is not the same as a PR10 optimized for Bollocks and a PR0 optimized
for Bollocks. PR10 will win hands down IMO.

And you can only go by looking at the toolbar PR which is out of date
the moment it is released.

I think what I am saying is exactly what you are saying, PR is
basically meaningless. Can a PR0 beat a PR10, theoretically I think
yes, you think no. Who really cares? It would have to be in some type
of extreme keyphrase market condiditons. A one man show page beyond the
likes the search engines have yet to review.

Not too many PR10s to play against though. Google sometimes shows a 10.
I am already after it for one two-word keyphrase. Google's contender in
this keyphrase contest indicates a PR4 mine's a PR0. That don't mean
nothing to me. I can take it down, not easily though.

good to see you around

-- http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/

On 7 Aug 2006 13:49:54 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Paul wrote:
On 6 Aug 2006 12:54:52 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com
wrote:

PR0 can be just as strong a competitor as a PR10
for the same keyphrase search, I think.

Disagree here. Your statement is too general.
Yes,I have had PR2 pages outrank PR5 and PR6 but a PR0 outranking PR10
for the same terms ? Doubtful.

Yes, a PR10 site could mention the word Bollocks somewhere in the text
and you could have a PR0 optimized for that and outrank it, but that
is not the same as a PR10 optimized for Bollocks and a PR0 optimized
for Bollocks. PR10 will win hands down IMO.

And you can only go by looking at the toolbar PR which is out of date
the moment it is released.

I think what I am saying is exactly what you are saying, PR is
basically meaningless. Can a PR0 beat a PR10, theoretically I think
yes, you think no.

A PR10 optimized for the same keyword will no way be outranked by a
PR0

I have had PR0 [toolbar] that has outranked PR4
I have had PR2 [toolbar] outrank PR5 and 6.

May be my site was better optimized ?

Who really cares?

The person who you are giving advice to. Or others that are learning.

It would have to be in some type of extreme keyphrase market condiditons. A one man show page beyond the
likes the search engines have yet to review.

Not too many PR10s to play against though. Google sometimes shows a 10.

I am already after it for one two-word keyphrase.

Which is ?

Google's contender in this keyphrase contest indicates a PR4 mine's a PR0. That don't mean
nothing to me.

We both know how accurate the toolbar is, so no point answering that.
<G>

I can take it down, not easily though.

With or without IBLs ?

good to see you around

Thanks. Been away and busy.

Good to be back.

plh
Paul


--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Paul wrote:

<snip>

et tu brute

I have spent three days sifting through various twists of my words on
three Internet fronts simultaneously including here.

I understand people want me to just go away.

My views regarding PR and its place in the search engine ranking
procedures have changed radically in the last two or three months. It
is a broken system that I no longer support manipulating because I see
the damage that it is doing to my neighbours and their web sites.

As a result of living in reality that the SERPs are a manipulated joke,
I no longer am a follower of the standard SEO trends. I create
resistance every time I write now. I don't even do it intentionally
sometimes either.


canadafred out

On 7 Aug 2006 15:31:24 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Paul wrote:

snip

et tu brute

eh ?

I have spent three days sifting through various twists of my words on
three Internet fronts simultaneously including here.

I understand people want me to just go away.

No idea Fred. Just got back. Still catching up.
Lay off smoking pike-hash and be less paranoid.

My views regarding PR and its place in the search engine ranking
procedures have changed radically in the last two or three months. It
is a broken system that I no longer support manipulating because I see
the damage that it is doing to my neighbours and their web sites.

Its not just you. There are many sites affected recently. You don't
have to manipulate anything, just make a good website and get links to
it.

As a result of living in reality that the SERPs are a manipulated joke,

Only manipulated by spammers and blackhatters.

I no longer am a follower of the standard SEO trends.

You're not going over to the Dark Side are you Fred ?
Feel The Force Fred. May the Force be with you <G>

I create resistance every time I write now. I don't even do it intentionally
sometimes either.

Its the drugs fred.
Either that or you're sniffing too many dead fish.

canadafred out

plh
Paul

--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:14:34 +0100, Paul
<lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 7 Aug 2006 15:31:24 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com
wrote:


Paul wrote:

snip

et tu brute

eh ?

I have spent three days sifting through various twists of my words on
three Internet fronts simultaneously including here.

I understand people want me to just go away.

No idea Fred. Just got back. Still catching up.
Lay off smoking pike-hash and be less paranoid.

My views regarding PR and its place in the search engine ranking
procedures have changed radically in the last two or three months. It
is a broken system that I no longer support manipulating because I see
the damage that it is doing to my neighbours and their web sites.

Its not just you. There are many sites affected recently. You don't
have to manipulate anything, just make a good website and get links to
it.

As a result of living in reality that the SERPs are a manipulated joke,

Only manipulated by spammers and blackhatters.

I no longer am a follower of the standard SEO trends.

You're not going over to the Dark Side are you Fred ?
Feel The Force Fred. May the Force be with you <G

I create resistance every time I write now. I don't even do it intentionally
sometimes either.

Its the drugs fred.
Either that or you're sniffing too many dead fish.

Mmmmm... I'd go for the drugs, myself!

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

"Paul" <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote

On 7 Aug 2006 15:31:24 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com
wrote:
snip

I create resistance every time I write now. I don't even do it
intentionally
sometimes either.

Its the drugs fred.
Either that or you're sniffing too many dead fish.

Paul he thought I was trying to ruin his credibility or I was afraid of him
or something just a couple of days ago. If you disagree with him he gets
like this. It is called resistance or attacks. :-) He is totally paranoid
and if he wants to have a discussion then have one. Don't think it is an
attack because someone disagrees.

Stacey