![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
64.233.187.104 reports for me new IBL and new PageRank. Below my expectations I must say. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:19:35 +0200, Borek borek (AT) parts (DOT) bpp.to.com.remove.pl> wrote: 64.233.187.104 reports for me new IBL and new PageRank. Below my expectations I must say. Hmmm, my dmoz link is not counted, even if it is at least month old... Best, Borek -- http://www.chembuddy.com - chemical calculators for labs and education BATE - program for pH calculations CASC - Concentration and Solution Calculator pH lectures - guide to hand pH calculation with examples |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hmmm, my dmoz link is not counted, even if it is at least month old... |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:19:35 +0200, Borek borek (AT) parts (DOT) bpp.to.com.remove.pl> wrote: 64.233.187.104 reports for me new IBL and new PageRank. Below my expectations I must say. Hmmm, my dmoz link is not counted, even if it is at least month old... |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hmmm, my dmoz link is not counted, even if it is at least month old... Use SearchStatus ( http://quirk.co.za/searchstatus/ ) to see if DMOZ listing is visible at API-level. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 05:53:51 +0200, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: Hmmm, my dmoz link is not counted, even if it is at least month old... Use SearchStatus ( http://quirk.co.za/searchstatus/ ) to see if DMOZ listing is visible at API-level. Do you know what it really does? I am using Opera, and the idea of installing Firefox just for one tool doesn't sound good. link:www.chembuddy.com doesn't show dmoz link, but it doesn't mean anything, as links presented are some subset of these known to G. So I have tried to be more specific and checked just dmoz site: link:www.chembuddy.com site:dmoz.org doesn't show anything, so perhaps dmoz was not indexed? chembuddy site:dmoz.org shows that dmoz _is_ indexed. Best, Borek |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
| http://www.schestowitz.com/temp/chembuddy.jpg Judging by the bottom-left corner, which from experience I can tell you is reliable, you are listed in the Google directory and DMOZ. That's what the red dots indicate. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:37:14 +0200, Roy Schestowitz newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote: http://www.schestowitz.com/temp/chembuddy.jpg Judging by the bottom-left corner, which from experience I can tell you is reliable, you are listed in the Google directory and DMOZ. That's what the red dots indicate. Thanks. I still don't like my PR4, as I hoped for PR5 - one of my competitors is listed just in dmoz in the same category I am listed, and he has PR5. From what I can tell he has no other valuable links. One of the first things I did as part of my SEO was to put my links in every place I could localize his url. I can't tell I am duplicating all his links, but almost. I have also many links from other places, mostly rubbish in terms of PR transferred, but not only. Has anyone seen any indications that PR can be sandboxed? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
No, you are misled. I am downed to PR4 in my front page at this very moment (used to be 5 with prospects of 6 according to a prediction tool) and _deeper_ levels still have PR5. Be patient as the update is in progress. There are many oddities I can spot. |

![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |