![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've got a choice of what links to make on my site One is like this: http://mysite.com/acmebrandname or this, http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/index.html Do the search engines care what I use ? It one better than the other ? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've got a choice of what links to make on my site One is like this: http://mysite.com/acmebrandname or this, http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/index.html Do the search engines care what I use ? It one better than the other ? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:50:05 GMT, meltedown <groups2 (AT) reenie (DOT) org wrote: I've got a choice of what links to make on my site One is like this: http://mysite.com/acmebrandname or this, http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/index.html Do the search engines care what I use ? It one better than the other ? Both lead to the same page, right? If so, then what is the difference? |
|
I've been told, by some folks, to use http://www.example.com/ for the main page menu/navigation bar link then, if repeating a link to the main page, share the full url http://www.example.com/index.html in hopes of duping some search engine spiders into thinking it is a different URL/link shared (for the same page though). |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Carol W <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:50:05 GMT, meltedown <groups2 (AT) reenie (DOT) org wrote: I've got a choice of what links to make on my site One is like this: http://mysite.com/acmebrandname or this, http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/index.html Do the search engines care what I use ? It one better than the other ? Both lead to the same page, right? If so, then what is the difference? Explained in my other post :-D. |
|
I've been told, by some folks, to use http://www.example.com/ for the main page menu/navigation bar link then, if repeating a link to the main page, share the full url http://www.example.com/index.html in hopes of duping some search engine spiders into thinking it is a different URL/link shared (for the same page though). Uhm, now that would be a stupid bot. |
|
two URLs, you have to worry about duplicated content. Ah, but they figure the bots would be smart enough to figure out "it |

#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
meltedown <groups2 (AT) reenie (DOT) org> wrote: I've got a choice of what links to make on my site One is like this: http://mysite.com/acmebrandname or this, http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/index.html Do the search engines care what I use ? It one better than the other ? Neither :-D. http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/ is the best. Yes, actually, that is what I meant. http://mysite.com/acmebrandname results in a 301 redirect to http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/, so is a waste of your server time, and the visitors time If people link to http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/ http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/index.html and http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/ might be seen as 2 different URLs for caching etc. So in short: add the / drop the index.html if / is the same as index.html (often the case) Yes they are essentially the same |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
John Bokma wrote: |
|
add the / drop the index.html if / is the same as index.html (often the case) Yes they are essentially the same the only difference being in how the data is drawn from the data base. For example http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/sale-300.html After the url modification, this becomes http://mysite.com/catalog/index.php?brandid=300 But if I do it like this: http://mysite.com/acmebrandname/ After the url modification, this becomes http://mysite.com/catalog/index.php?...=acmebrandname |
|
The first is preferable for avoiding confusion in the database, since it uses the integer to identify the brand instead of a string. However, if the first method will result in higher search engine placement, I'd rather use that. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 4 Dec 2005 03:03:46 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: |
|
main page menu/navigation bar link then, if repeating a link to the main page, share the full url http://www.example.com/index.html in hopes of duping some search engine spiders into thinking it is a different URL/link shared (for the same page though). Uhm, now that would be a stupid bot. Well I did say they did it "in hopes of duping" - but some folks think the bots can be that stupid. *shrug* |
|
Also, if index.html and / are seen as two URLs, you have to worry about duplicated content. Ah, but they figure the bots would be smart enough to figure out "it is the same page, not a different one" thereby avoiding penalty thoughts. ![]() |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Uhm, this is a different question :-D Now you want to know, which is better: http://example.com/acmebrandname/sale-300.html or http://example.com/acmebrandname/ ? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
John Bokma wrote: Uhm, this is a different question :-D Now you want to know, which is better: http://example.com/acmebrandname/sale-300.html or http://example.com/acmebrandname/ ? Yes, I would like to know which is better for the search engine. They both go to the same page. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |