banned in google

What does it mean? and how look in practise that penalty?

Regards

D.

Dany <jancosik (AT) poczta (DOT) fm> typed:

What does it mean? and how look in practise that penalty?

they put a small "this page has been banned from our database"-image next to
your page in the serps. or, that may be more plausible, they just don't show
your page because it has been banned....

do they ban all domain or webpage that mislead SERP?


U¿ytkownik "Jan Harders" <janh (AT) hitservice (DOT) net> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
news:2m250gFhq47nU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de...

Dany <jancosik (AT) poczta (DOT) fm> typed:
What does it mean? and how look in practise that penalty?

they put a small "this page has been banned from our database"-image next
to
your page in the serps. or, that may be more plausible, they just don't
show
your page because it has been banned....

do they ban all domain or webpage that mislead SERP?

No, because if they do it successfully then the engines don't know.
But they try to, or at least penalise the pages/sites by positioning
them low in the rankings where they'll receive little traffic.

What you mean by sayin no? They ban domain or singles webpages which uses
spam techniques?

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:48:01 +0200, "Dany" <jancosik (AT) poczta (DOT) fm> wrote:

do they ban all domain or webpage that mislead SERP?

No, because if they do it successfully then the engines don't know.
But they try to, or at least penalise the pages/sites by positioning
them low in the rankings where they'll receive little traffic.

BB

U¿ytkownik "Jan Harders" <janh (AT) hitservice (DOT) net> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
news:2m250gFhq47nU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de...
Dany <jancosik (AT) poczta (DOT) fm> typed:
What does it mean? and how look in practise that penalty?

they put a small "this page has been banned from our database"-image next
to
your page in the serps. or, that may be more plausible, they just don't
show
your page because it has been banned....

On 20/7/04 6:30 pm, Big Bill wrote:

I'm saying that if a site uses what's regarded as a spam technique but
does it very very well, the engines won't even notice it. Like
cloaking.

True, but unless you're really REALLY subtle about it, a disgruntled
competitor is eventually going to notice what you're doing and blow the
whistle :-)

BTW Bill, is there something wrong with your clock or are you posting
messages from the future? Perhaps I could borrow your time machine some day?

Phil
--
Philip Ronan
phil.ronanzzz (AT) virgin (DOT) net
(Please remove the "z"s if replying by email)

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:24:26 +0200, "Dany" <jancosik (AT) poczta (DOT) fm> wrote:

do they ban all domain or webpage that mislead SERP?

No, because if they do it successfully then the engines don't know.
But they try to, or at least penalise the pages/sites by positioning
them low in the rankings where they'll receive little traffic.


What you mean by sayin no? They ban domain or singles webpages which uses
spam techniques?

I'm saying that if a site uses what's regarded as a spam technique but
does it very very well, the engines won't even notice it. Like
cloaking.
Another problem the engines have is what do they do with a site which
is spammed all over the shop but also has very good content and
backlinks? Should they ban it for using spam? Or should they keep it
because it has good content?
It's not cut and dried you know. It's not all black and white. And the
vogue for today's particular shade of grey is always essentially
transcient.

BB

On 20/7/04 10:44 pm, Big Bill wrote:

Time at this precise moment is 21.43.30

BB

That would be BST. You're still on GMT, apparently.

--
Philip Ronan
phil.ronanzzz (AT) virgin (DOT) net
(Please remove the "z"s if replying by email)

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:12:17 +0100, Philip Ronan
<phil.ronanzzz (AT) virgin (DOT) net> wrote:

On 20/7/04 6:30 pm, Big Bill wrote:

I'm saying that if a site uses what's regarded as a spam technique but
does it very very well, the engines won't even notice it. Like
cloaking.

True, but unless you're really REALLY subtle about it, a disgruntled
competitor is eventually going to notice what you're doing and blow the
whistle :-)

BTW Bill, is there something wrong with your clock or are you posting
messages from the future? Perhaps I could borrow your time machine some day?

Phil

Time at this precise moment is 21.43.30

BB

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:24:43 +0100, Philip Ronan
<phil.ronanzzz (AT) virgin (DOT) net> wrote:

On 20/7/04 10:44 pm, Big Bill wrote:

Time at this precise moment is 21.43.30

BB

That would be BST. You're still on GMT, apparently.

And this is a bad thing?

BB