![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello experts! When submitting to web directories, keywords in the anchor usually help to improve ranking for these keywords. But being linked *exclusively* with keywords might be considered unnatural by google and thus have the opposite effect. I'd like to know about your experiences as to 'natural anchor text'. Let's suppose, you'd want to submit your site to 100 web directories. Which ratio of the following possibilities would you favour? - main keyword / keyphrase only - company name / official website title only - domain name only - domain name + main keyword/keyphrase - company name + main keyword/keyphrase |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
__/ [Michael Sattler] on Monday 28 November 2005 08:33 \__ Hello experts! When submitting to web directories, keywords in the anchor usually help to improve ranking for these keywords. But being linked *exclusively* with keywords might be considered unnatural by google and thus have the opposite effect. I'd like to know about your experiences as to 'natural anchor text'. Let's suppose, you'd want to submit your site to 100 web directories. Which ratio of the following possibilities would you favour? - main keyword / keyphrase only - company name / official website title only - domain name only - domain name + main keyword/keyphrase - company name + main keyword/keyphrase It depends. What you probably want in the anchor text are keywords that correspond to SEPR's you aim for. If you sell blue widgets, you probably want "blue widget(s)" in the anchor. If very few people ever look for /blue/ widgets, aim for just "widget" and see if you can fit in page 1 of the results pages. Domain names are probably unimportant. Very few people will search for domain names. Search is in fact a simplification which rids the user from the need to memorise or guess Web addresses. Don't forget to diversity the anchor texts, making slight variations that make it all appear less automated. Roy -- Roy S. Schestowitz | Y |-(1^2)|^(1/2)+1 K http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E 8:40am up 8:24, 3 users, load average: 0.19, 0.15, 0.05 http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
| "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote in message news:dmefvk$2l8c$1 (AT) godfrey (DOT) mcc.ac.uk... __/ [Michael Sattler] on Monday 28 November 2005 08:33 \__ SNIP Let's suppose, you'd want to submit your site to 100 web directories. Which ratio of the following possibilities would you favour? - main keyword / keyphrase only - company name / official website title only - domain name only - domain name + main keyword/keyphrase - company name + main keyword/keyphrase SNIP Don't forget to diversity the anchor texts, making slight variations that make it all appear less automated. what a load of pish, if my companies called xyz and all anchor links link to xyz then is this unnatural - i dont think so same applies for keywords, in fact i propose that if all anchor links are identical it should increase your relevancy |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello experts! When submitting to web directories, keywords in the anchor usually help to improve ranking for these keywords. But being linked *exclusively* with keywords might be considered unnatural by google and thus have the opposite effect. I'd like to know about your experiences as to 'natural anchor text'. Let's suppose, you'd want to submit your site to 100 web directories. Which ratio of the following possibilities would you favour? - main keyword / keyphrase only - company name / official website title only - domain name only - domain name + main keyword/keyphrase - company name + main keyword/keyphrase Thanks, Michael |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
what makes you think the directories would give you this choice? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Domain names are probably unimportant. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> schrieb: what makes you think the directories would give you this choice? There are directories, that are tolerant as to keywords in the title/link text. Michael |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:42:54 +0100, Michael Sattler misa4nospam (AT) gmx (DOT) de> wrote: Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> schrieb: what makes you think the directories would give you this choice? There are directories, that are tolerant as to keywords in the title/link text. Michael Do you have examples please? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
There are directories, that are tolerant as to keywords in the title/link text. Michael Do you have examples please? BB -- |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |