AISE Stats: 30/01/2008-06/02/2008

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:32:49 +0000, Paul <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com>
wrote:

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:43:02 GMT, Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:46:13 +0000, Paul <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com
wrote:

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:11:29 -0500, "Chris F.A. Johnson"
cfajohnson (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On 2008-02-06, Paul wrote:


On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:26:36 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote in message
news:zq2dnSZ7v8XITDTaRVnyigA (AT) bt (DOT) com...

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1827709.OK7QyImkrv (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com...
[Paul, I removed that mover]


Please could you also remove posters that
post using multiple identities ;o)

LMAO!

Another reason is because I had to use another agent cos you are k/f
on the main one. I have 19 agents installed on this PC. Each for
different groups.

Why don't you just use one agent that can kill-file based on group
as well as name?

It is not possible to use just one agent.
I also use agent for email, and need them for other email addresses.
But, I use alibis for usenet, and they use east and west side servers.
[Recently they dropped west side]
And they way alibis is set up, you can only access certain groups via
certain servers.

For eg, mp3 groups will be one one server, text groups on another etc
etc.

plh
Paul

Your new sig doesn't wrap properly.

It looks okay here [wraps okay] and also gets removed on a reply.
It follows the same rules as before.
ie hyphen, hyphen, space bar, return.

plh
Paul

BB

Nah, it's about a word too long (top line) to wrap. For me, anyway. I
appreciate that structurally it's correct.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/

"Big Bill" <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:32:49 +0000, Paul <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com
wrote:

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:43:02 GMT, Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:46:13 +0000, Paul <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com
wrote:

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:11:29 -0500, "Chris F.A. Johnson"
cfajohnson (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On 2008-02-06, Paul wrote:


On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:26:36 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote in message
news:zq2dnSZ7v8XITDTaRVnyigA (AT) bt (DOT) com...

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1827709.OK7QyImkrv (AT) schestowitz (DOT) com...
[Paul, I removed that mover]


Please could you also remove posters that
post using multiple identities ;o)

LMAO!

Another reason is because I had to use another agent cos you are k/f
on the main one. I have 19 agents installed on this PC. Each for
different groups.

Why don't you just use one agent that can kill-file based on group
as well as name?

It is not possible to use just one agent.
I also use agent for email, and need them for other email addresses.
But, I use alibis for usenet, and they use east and west side servers.
[Recently they dropped west side]
And they way alibis is set up, you can only access certain groups via
certain servers.

For eg, mp3 groups will be one one server, text groups on another etc
etc.

plh
Paul

Your new sig doesn't wrap properly.

It looks okay here [wraps okay] and also gets removed on a reply.
It follows the same rules as before.
ie hyphen, hyphen, space bar, return.

plh
Paul

BB

Nah, it's about a word too long (top line) to wrap. For me, anyway. I
appreciate that structurally it's correct.

BB

I thought it was only supposed to be 4 lines?

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:37:44 GMT, Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Your new sig doesn't wrap properly.

It looks okay here [wraps okay] and also gets removed on a reply.
It follows the same rules as before.
ie hyphen, hyphen, space bar, return.

plh
Paul

BB

Nah, it's about a word too long (top line) to wrap. For me, anyway. I
appreciate that structurally it's correct.

Dunno why that is Bill.
It is an old sig of mine and I haven't altered it in any way.
plh
Paul

BB

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:40:14 -0000, "T.J." <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote:

Nah, it's about a word too long (top line) to wrap. For me, anyway. I
appreciate that structurally it's correct.

BB

I thought it was only supposed to be 4 lines?

On my PC it is 4 lines.

I wouldn't worry about it though <G>

plh
Paul

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On 2008-02-07, T.J. wrote:

"Big Bill" <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote
....
Your new sig doesn't wrap properly.

It looks okay here [wraps okay] and also gets removed on a reply.
It follows the same rules as before.
ie hyphen, hyphen, space bar, return.

Nah, it's about a word too long (top line) to wrap. For me, anyway. I
appreciate that structurally it's correct.

I thought it was only supposed to be 4 lines?

And less than 80 characters per line.


--
Chris F.A. Johnson, webmaster <http://Woodbine-Gerrard.com>
================================================== =================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)

"Paul" <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:37:44 GMT, Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:


Your new sig doesn't wrap properly.

It looks okay here [wraps okay] and also gets removed on a reply.
It follows the same rules as before.
ie hyphen, hyphen, space bar, return.

plh
Paul

BB

Nah, it's about a word too long (top line) to wrap. For me, anyway. I
appreciate that structurally it's correct.

Dunno why that is Bill.
It is an old sig of mine and I haven't altered it in any way.

Old sig? Really?:-)
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Re...LJ:en&filter=0

I would have thought it would have brought up more results. Yahoo only has a
few more and also MSN.

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:02:19 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"Paul" <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:jginq3l9a7d2999f97a2h0rh7k7bu5egf2 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:37:44 GMT, Big Bill <bill (AT) kruse (DOT) co.uk> wrote:


Your new sig doesn't wrap properly.

It looks okay here [wraps okay] and also gets removed on a reply.
It follows the same rules as before.
ie hyphen, hyphen, space bar, return.

plh
Paul

BB

Nah, it's about a word too long (top line) to wrap. For me, anyway. I
appreciate that structurally it's correct.

Dunno why that is Bill.
It is an old sig of mine and I haven't altered it in any way.

Old sig? Really?:-)
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Re...LJ:en&filter=0

Calling me a liar now are we ?

I have used it before - MONTHS ago.

I would have thought it would have brought up more results. Yahoo only has a
few more and also MSN.

So frigging what ?




--
http://www.crystalbuffalo.com/americ...external1.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-210.html
http://www.firstpeople.us/native-ame...-for-Sale.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:02:19 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

Old sig? Really?:-)

Yes.

Now I will write this very slowly as I know you cannot read very fast.

As I have mentioned before, I have 19 agents installed on my PC.
Only 3 were set up for this group. Lets call them A, B and C

A is the original one.
B and C are cloned from A

This was because A become unstable, and as I didn't want to lose
messages from other groups, I copied the whole lot to another folder.

Later on, I did it again as I needed an agent for a new email address.

On A, I k/f you because you were pissing me off with your constant
barrage of abuse and belittling.

Note : When I add a sig, I use it there and then. - Why would I add it
otherwise ?

Now, baring in mind that the cloned versions - B and C - have the SAME
sigs as A does, then it is a question of looking at B or C to see when
I started using them [Agents]

I have looked at version B and the first inbound email was :
19 July 2007

So, at the earliest, the cloned versions started in July.
That means the original agent had that sig in July 07 - or before.

So, yes, that sig is old.

Now I can get back to doing some graphics.

Laters.



--
http://www.crystalbuffalo.com/americ...external1.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-210.html
http://www.firstpeople.us/native-ame...-for-Sale.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----