![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: "Chr. von Stuckrad" <stucki (AT) mi (DOT) fu-berlin.de Date: 3 November 2009 04:03:23 PST (CA) To: mailman-users (AT) python (DOT) org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] regexp help (OT: Edit and Mail) On Mon, 02 Nov 2009, Savoy, Jim wrote: Depending on the options set in vi, it can do horrible things to indentation when you paste things in ![]() :-) seen that! Therefore modern vims have :set paste<enter and as long as you not 'set nopaste' *no* munging of pastes will be done! I'm needing/using that all the time, I might even put it into my '.vimrc' and make it default ... I just looked at your original posting (using Outlook) and line 3 is not indented, but rather continuous from line 2, and the other indents are in columns 5 and 9 (not 4 and 8). I shall try viewing it with other mail clients, just for kicks. 'outlook' is a <insert favorite expletive here> for programmers. By Default it *reformats* everything to 'Paragraphs' of the form: - everything NOT split by an empty line is 'supposed to be a useless linebreak for mailtransfer', then it collects all those lines and reformats the resulting words with single whitespaces to window-size. - an empty line means 'paragraph end', so itself may vanish anyway only the linebreak in a paragraph stays. It's like Microsoft(office)Word's view of Text and you are supposed to write html or rtf anyway :-) If hints(warnings, whatever) are on, you'll see a line above your munged mail, saying it removed useless newlines, and by clicking it you can get them back. Stucki |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |