![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Should one place meta tags on only the home page, or all pages?? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
meta tags, such as Keywords, are not as important to Search Engines as they used to be. But for those that do factor them into their rankings, you would want them to be on all your pages and not just the home page. The Description tag IS important, so whatever your ranking, when you ARE found in the Search Engine listing, a user can get an idea of what is on the page. -- E. Michael Brandt www.valleywebdesigns.com home of JustSo PictureWindows 3 "Jenna" <jennaw707 (AT) NOSPAMhotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:cc278o$32v$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com... Should one place meta tags on only the home page, or all pages?? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Should one place meta tags on only the home page, or all pages?? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jenna wrote: Should one place meta tags on only the home page, or all pages?? It's a variable, at least for me. If the interior pages are such that I want them to show up in a search engine or directory, yes, definitely. But there are interior pages I don't especially want to be "noticed" except in context from the outside shell of the site or subsite. I don't tag those. As an example, I have a university athletics site that I manage. Obviously the home page is tagged extensively. So is each section tag but some of the student-athlete information pages aren't. If they bookmark them once they get there, fine but I'd rather a newcomer entered through the front door. Likewise with all the team subsites. Their index are heavily tagged, described and they are functionally front pages. The inside pages aren't tagged at all. I know folks bookmark the stats and gallery pages - which is fine - but I don't have any need for those interior pages to appear in a search engine by themselves. Which doesn't mean they don't, only that I didn't go looking for it. I guess the bottom line is that you want to tag and describe the pages you want to be found via the search engines and directories. O. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
If the pages are linked they will be found and ranked whether you want them to be or not. The only way to prevent this would be to have a robots.txt file that directs the spiders not to scan the page. Indeed. But not necessarily. If I have pages in a directory where none |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've just done some research and come to the conclusion that, indeed if one wants higher search engine scores, one should use tags on interior pages. But not just copy and paste from the front page; each should reflect what's actually there. |
|
Murray *TMM* wrote: If the pages are linked they will be found and ranked whether you want them to be or not. The only way to prevent this would be to have a robots.txt file that directs the spiders not to scan the page. Indeed. But not necessarily. If I have pages in a directory where none of them is tagged, they seem to stay nice and anonymous. If they're linked from pages that are tagged (or in a directory where the index is tagged), you're right; they show up. I've just done some research and come to the conclusion that, indeed if one wants higher search engine scores, one should use tags on interior pages. But not just copy and paste from the front page; each should reflect what's actually there. So. For my public pages, I stand corrected. I won't promise to go back and add tags to the thousands of pages on my primary site but I will likely add them as new pages are created, especially if they're important information pages. Good topic and good thread. O. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |